Skip to content

Retrospective Study of Patients With Severe Aplastic Anemia Who Relapsed After Immunosuppressive Therapy

Retrospective Study of Patients With Severe Aplastic Anemia Who Relapsed After Immunosuppressive Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04436380
Enrollment
173
Registered
2020-06-18
Start date
2020-06-15
Completion date
2023-03-15
Last updated
2023-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Severe Aplastic Anemia

Keywords

Alemtuzumab, rATG, Natural History

Brief summary

Background: Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a form of bone marrow failure. It usually results from a cytotoxic T cell attack on the marrow stem cell. Two treatments can be used for most people with SAA. One is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). The other is immunosuppressive treatment (IST). For people who are treated with IST, relapse can occur. If this happens, they can have HSCT or be re-treated with IST. The two most common IST regimes used for relapsed SAA are rabbit ATG (rATG) and alemtuzumab. Both rATG and alemtuzumab have similar response rates and survival rates. There is not much long-term data on people who need repeat IST treatment due to relapse. Researchers want to look at data from past studies to learn more. Objective: To compare the data of relapsed SAA patients between those who received alemtuzumab versus rATG for repeat IST treatment. Eligibility: Adults and children with SAA who were enrolled on NHLBI protocol 12-H-0150, 06-H-0034, 05-H-0242, 03-H-0249, 03-H-0193, 00-H-0032, or 90-H-0146 Design: This study uses data from past studies. The participants in those studies have allowed their data to be used in future research. Researchers will review participants medical records. They will collect clinical data, such as notes, test results, and imaging scans. They will also collect the research data gathered as part of the original study. Researchers will enter the data into an in-house database. It is password protected. All data will be kept in secure network drives or in secure sites. Other studies may be added in the future....

Detailed description

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a form of bone marrow failure and in most cases is the result of a cytotoxic T cell attack on the marrow stem cell. It is effectively treated in most patients with either immunosuppressive treatment (IST) or upfront allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). However, in patients who are treated with IST, relapse remains an issue with a rate of 30-40%. Once relapsed, patients can be either re-treated with IST or undergo HSCT. The two most common IST regimes used for relapsed SAA are rabbit ATG (rATG) and alemtuzumab. Both rATG and alemtuzumab have been shown to have a response rate of approximately 60% in relapsed patients with similar overall survival rates of 83-85%. Previous predictors of relapse include time from diagnosis to IST, and early response to IST. Few long-term data exist on patients requiring repeat IST treatment due to relapse.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* This is a retrospective chart review. The investigators will review the medical records of adults and children with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) enrolled on immunosuppressive therapy (IST) treatment protocols in the NHLBI. Patients who opted out of future use of data on their prior studies will be excluded from this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of long-term outcomes of relapsed patients who received repeat ISTBetween the Period of 1990 to 2020Characteristics and outcomes of relapsed SAA patients between those who received alemtuzumab versus rATG for repeat IST

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical predictors for the development of relapseBetween the Period of 1990 to 2020Clinical predictors for the development of relapse such as age, gender, baseline laboratory values, time from diagnosis to initial treatment, and initial treatment received.
Rates of clonal evolution between relapsed patients depending on type of IST received and number of IST rounds requiredBetween the Period of 1990 to 2020Compare rates of clonal evolution between relapsed patients depending on type of IST received and number of IST rounds required.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026