Skip to content

Home Link: Post Hospital Care to Reduce HIV Mortality in South Africa

Home Link: Post Hospital Care to Reduce HIV Mortality in South Africa

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04436289
Acronym
HomeLink
Enrollment
195
Registered
2020-06-18
Start date
2020-07-01
Completion date
2023-02-28
Last updated
2024-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV/AIDS

Keywords

home-based, post-hospital care

Brief summary

Background: This is a pilot randomized clinical trial (RCT) to demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of a structural and behavioral intervention to reduce mortality following hospital discharge for people with HIV (PWH) in South Africa. Investigators' prior study showed that among 121 PWH discharged, 54% were readmitted and 26% had died by six months following discharge. In the prior study, investigators identified that missing clinic visits after discharge was associated with death. Here investigators are seeking to overcome key barriers in piloting a home-based post-hospital care intervention. Investigators' approach is informed by a conceptual model of key barriers to the care transition along with a behavioral explanatory model, the Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations. The overarching goal of this study is to tailor and pilot the intervention that shifts initial post-discharge care from the out-patient clinic to the home and provides patient-centered counseling (Home Link intervention). For the intervention to prove effective it will need to substantially reduce post-discharge mortality. Specifically, in the Home Link intervention, a team will conduct home visits to (1) provide a structured clinical assessment; (2) reconcile medications, (3) provide psychosocial support through patient-centered counseling, and (4) assess home needs (food security). These visits will start one week after discharge and be repeated every two weeks until the participant is stabilized and ready to initiate lower intensity clinic-based services or three months have elapsed. Aims: The aims of the study are to pilot a randomized clinical trial of home delivery of health services during the post-hospital period for PWH. Methods: This project is a pilot randomized clinical trial (RCT) to refine and test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of the HomeLink intervention. At the conclusion of the R34 grant period investigators will have a protocol and procedural manual ready for a full RCT powered for effectiveness. Significance: The proposed study is consistent with NIH HIV/AIDS highest priority research and the South African National Strategic Plan on HIV, tuberculosis (TB), and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) 2017-2022. The research addresses the HIV/AIDS Research Priority of retention and engagement in these services, and achievement and maintenance of optimal prevention and treatment responses.

Detailed description

BACKGROUND Sub-Saharan Africa HIV mortality: In 2016 in South Africa approximately 154,000 PWH died. Of these deaths, 110,000 have been characterized as excess mortality due to HIV (HIV associated deaths). Overall, HIV-associated deaths are associated advanced disease defined by a low cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count. In-Hospital and Post-Hospital Mortality in Africa: Inpatient mortality among people with HIV (PWH) in Africa is uniformly high ranging from 17.2 to 29.6% across the continent, including in South Africa. Following discharge from an index hospitalization the mortality is also high. In investigators' preliminary work investigators have observed a 26% mortality in the 6 months after hospital discharge. This observation is consistent with mortality from other reports: 50% mortality at twelve months and 30% and 31% at six months reported from Tanzania, Kenya, and South Africa, respectively. Contribution of Post-Hospital Mortality to Overall Death among People with HIV: In South Africa there are approximately 84,633 public sector acute care hospital beds of which approximately 25% are adult medicine beds. By extrapolating the post-discharge mortality investigators observed to all discharges among PWH in South Africa investigators can estimate the annual mortality among PWH with a hospital discharge in the past six months. Considering the national proportion of all admissions that are for PWH, the average length of stay, and the annual readmission rate an estimated 240,000 PWH are admitted to medicine wards in South Africa annually. A six-month post-hospital mortality of 26% suggests a total of 62,374 post-hospital deaths among PWH. This number of deaths represents 40% of the approximately 154,000 total annual deaths among PWH in South Africa. A modest reduction in post-hospital deaths could substantially reduce overall HIV mortality in South Africa. Causes of Post-Hospital Death: Some post-hospital deaths may be unavoidable due to advanced or incurable disease. Other post-hospital deaths may be avoidable with improved retention in care. A study from Johannesburg, South Africa assessed loss from care for HIV-TB co-infected patients; only 42% of patients discharged were known to have been to an HIV clinic within 30 days of hospital discharge \[the time needed to obtain or refill antiretroviral therapy (ART) prescriptions at the time of the study\]. Similarly in Investigators' preliminary study, only 19% of participants attended a scheduled follow-up visit. Failure to attend a scheduled visit was associated with subsequent mortality in Investigators' preliminary study and in a report from Tanzania. At present, there is limited research regarding approaches to retaining PWH in care during the post-hospital transition. STUDY OBJECTIVES The overarching goal of this proposal is to demonstrate clinical trial feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of structured post-discharge medical home visits to reduce mortality following the transition from the hospital to home. Investigators are proposing a pilot randomized clinical trial (RCT) to determine preliminary efficacy, feasibility of trial implementation and intervention delivery, acceptability of the intervention, the effect of the intervention on barriers to care, and to obtain detailed baseline psychosocial and medical needs to inform intervention refinement and explain outcomes. The primary objectives of this study are: 1. To estimate 6 month mortality rates and assess for evidence of efficacy of the Home Link intervention compared to care as usual. 2. To determine the feasibility, acceptability, and effect of the Home Link intervention on identified barriers to care. 3. To characterize medical and behavioral needs among participants in the study. The secondary objectives of this study are: 1. Determine post-hospital health care out-of-pocket costs for participants 2. Assess re-admission 3. Estimate 12 month mortality by study arm SIGNIFICANCE This study fits with the South African National Strategic Plan to increase effective HIV treatment. The study is also consistent with NIH HIV/AIDS highest priority research and the South African National Strategic Plan on HIV, TB, and STIs 2017-2022. Given the high post-discharge mortality findings from this study could contribute to approaches to reduce mortality for PWH. METHODS Study design: This is a pilot randomized clinical trial (RCT) to refine and test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of Home Link. Study setting: This pilot operational research study will be conducted in Matlosana. All participants will be recruited from Tshepong Hospital. Eligibility will include residing within Matlosana sub-district. Tshepong Hospital: Tshepong Hospital is a tertiary care hospital in Matlosana. An average of 30 patients are admitted to medicine wards daily. Nearly 50% are PWH. Description of the geographical areas of study implementation: The proposed study will be conducted at the 500 bed Tshepong Hospital in the Northwest Province. Tshepong Hospital is one of 5 hospitals in Kenneth Kaunda District and the single tertiary care public hospital serving the population of 400,000 in Matlosana. This hospital was selected due to its size, heterogeneous catchment area (rural to urban), and long-standing working relationships with the research team. Tshepong Hospital currently provides discharge services that include (1) discharge counseling and education provided by counselors and (2) a medical record notebook with a discharge summary for the patient to take to his or her clinic visits. Rationale for selecting geographical areas of study implementation: Investigators selected Tshepong Hospital based on a long-standing working relationship between the PI, the Perinatal HIV Research Unit (PHRU), and the Tshepong Hospital. This has included a prior study of post-hospital outcomes. Study Population: The study population is comprised of adults (≥18 years old), either male or female, spending at least two nights in a medical ward of Tshepong Hospital. Investigators will only include individuals with known HIV status, either HIV-positive or HIV-negative. Investigators propose to recruit up to 180 HIV-positive and 60 HIV-uninfected participants. Randomization to the intervention vs control arms will be stratified by HIV status. Pre-discharge study procedures: All participants will have a baseline demographic health and psychosocial questionnaire (E001, E002). Care-as-usual (CAU) study arm: Participants will receive standard discharge care as provided at Tshepong Hospital during the study. This currently includes discharge counseling from a trained discharge counselor and will be provided with a follow-up return date (usually two weeks post-hospital). Discharge counseling will include a review of discharge medications and instructions regarding follow-up care visits. Home Link study arm: The Home Link intervention will be delivered by a home visit team including a primary care nurse and counselor trained in patient-centered. A rotating hospital-based doctor will be available for pre-home visit clinical file review and post-visit discussion, via cell phone, for decision making and input on patient care during a household visit. Investigators have termed this individual a discharge officer. The discharge officer will be a Tshepong clinician who is working in the hospital. Supporting Home Link is expected to take \<30 minutes of the physician's time during the day. For study-specific concerns, the team will consult with a Good Clinical Practice (GCP)-trained, PHRU research doctor based at the Tshepong Hospital. Post-discharge follow-up: The primary outcome is mortality six months after hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes include mortality 12 months after hospital discharge, number of nights spent in a hospital, number of ambulatory clinical encounters after the index hospitalization, and patient out-of-pocket costs for medical care. Outcomes will be assessed through scheduled contact and completion of a structured questionnaire with the participant or designated next of kin (either telephonic or in person if telephonic fails) at 8, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. Mortality will be further ascertained through a 26 and 52 week review of the Tshepong Hospital file (including the affiliated Klerksdorp hospital files) and matching of participant national identification numbers to the vital statistics register through consultation with the Department of Home Affairs. Repeat hospitalization will be ascertained using self-report / next of kin report and hospital records. Most subsequent hospitalizations can be expected to be at Tshepong Hospital due to the substantial distance to reach the next nearest hospital (\>50 km to a lower level facility). In Investigators' prior experience investigators have observed rare use of alternative hospitals. Clinic visit data will be ascertained by self-report followed by verification through review of clinic paper or electronic (tier.net) records and National Health Laboratory Service electronic records (TrackCare).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHome Link

In the Home Link intervention, a team will conduct home visits to (1) provide a structured clinical assessment; (2) reconcile medications, (3) provide psychosocial support through patient-centered counseling, and (4) assess home needs (food security). These visits will start one week after discharge and be repeated every two weeks until the participant is stabilized and ready to initiate lower intensity clinic-based services or three months have elapsed.

Sponsors

University of Witwatersrand, South Africa
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

Participants and members of the research team recruiting and implementing the strategy will be unmasked to randomization assignment due to the behavioral nature of the strategy and need for team members to explain the study arm procedures to participants. Study assignments will be masked to the investigators until all outcome data have been collected.

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomized 1:1 to care as usual or Home Link arm. We will perform individual randomization blocked by HIV-status to enroll 30 HIV-uninfected per arm and 90 PWH per arm.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Tested for HIV (can be living with HIV or HIV-uninfected) * Residing within Matlosana sub-district * Agree to post-discharge follow-up including home visit * Able to provide informed consent or, if lacking capacity at the time of recruitment (if unable to answer basic orientation questions including name, month/year, and residence location), as determined by the study team, having a next of kin able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* \<18 years of age * Length of stay \<2 nights * Unknown HIV status at the point of study screening and enrollment * Failure by the patient or next of kin to provide informed consent to be followed up by study staff after discharge * Residing outside of Matlosana sub-district * Not speaking any of the languages spoken by the study team Late exclusions occurring after enrollment: * Death prior to hospital discharge * Discharged too late for the study team to deliver the intervention * Transfer to another hospital * Relocation outside of Matlosana sub-district at the point of discharge or within 7 days of discharge

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mortality at 6 Months6 months after hospital dischargeNumber of deaths from any cause.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time (Days) to Any Non-acute Follow-upUp to 52 weeks post-hospital dischargeTime to first clinic or home visit post-hospital discharge.
Number of Outpatient Follow-up Care EncountersUp to 52 weeks post-hospital dischargeNumber of outpatient follow-up care (clinic or home visit) encounters
Number of Nights of Hospital ReadmissionUp to 52 weeks post-hospital dischargeNumber of nights spent in hospital post-initial discharge (among those with at least one readmission)
Cost of CareUp to 52 weeks post-hospital dischargeParticipant-reported out-of-pocket costs for medical care
Mortality at 12 Months12 months after hospital dischargeNumber of deaths from any cause.
Feasibility of Clinical Trial as Assessed by Enrollment PercentageUp to 52 weeksPercentage of approached and eligible individuals who enroll.
Feasibility of Clinical Trial as Assessed by Percentage of Participants With Complete Follow-upUp to 52 weeksFeasibility of clinical trial will be determined by the percentage of participants with complete follow-up.
Feasibility of Intervention as Assessed by Participant Program CompletionUp to 6 monthsThe number of intervention arm participants with home visit #1 completed, completion of the 12 week follow-up, and vital status ascertainment at 6 months.
Number of Participants Completing In-depth Interviews to Assess Acceptability of the InterventionUp to 52 weeks post-hospital dischargeAcceptability questionnaire and in-depth interviews with 7 acceptability domains for healthcare workers (HCWs) and participants and in-depth interviews for HCWs and participants. An a priori code book will be developed that reflects key analytic concepts of predisposing, enabling, and need characteristics from the Andersen Behavioral Model. During the process of reading and coding of transcripts using this initial coding scheme, additional codes may be added to document emerging themes of interest.

Countries

South Africa

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PLWH Home Link Study Arm
The Home Link intervention will be delivered by a home visit team including a primary care nurse and counselor trained in patient-centered counseling. A rotating hospital-based doctor will be available for pre-home visit clinical file review and post-visit discussion, via cell phone, for decision making and input on patient care during a household visit. We have termed this individual a discharge officer. The discharge officer will be a Tshepong clinician who is working in the hospital. Supporting Home Link is expected to take \<30 minutes of the physician's time during the day. For study-specific concerns, the team will consult with a GCP-trained, PHRU research doctor based at Tshepong Hospital. Home Link: In the Home Link intervention, a team will conduct home visits to (1) provide a structured clinical assessment; (2) reconcile medications, (3) provide psychosocial support through patient-centered counseling, and (4) assess home needs (food security). These visits will start one week after discharge and be repeated every two weeks until the participant is stabilized and ready to initiate lower intensity clinic-based services or three months have elapsed.
55
PLWH Care-as-usual (CAU) Study Arm
Participants will receive standard discharge care as provided at Tshepong Hospital during the study. This currently includes discharge counseling from a trained discharge counselor and will be provided with a follow-up return date (usually two weeks post-hospital). Discharge counseling will include a review of discharge medications and instructions regarding follow-up care visits.
56
PLWOH Home Link Study Arm
The Home Link intervention will be delivered by a home visit team including a primary care nurse and counselor trained in patient-centered counseling. A rotating hospital-based doctor will be available for pre-home visit clinical file review and post-visit discussion, via cell phone, for decision making and input on patient care during a household visit. We have termed this individual a discharge officer. The discharge officer will be a Tshepong clinician who is working in the hospital. Supporting Home Link is expected to take \<30 minutes of the physician's time during the day. For study-specific concerns, the team will consult with a GCP-trained, PHRU research doctor based at Tshepong Hospital. Home Link: In the Home Link intervention, a team will conduct home visits to (1) provide a structured clinical assessment; (2) reconcile medications, (3) provide psychosocial support through patient-centered counseling, and (4) assess home needs (food security). These visits will start one week after discharge and be repeated every two weeks until the participant is stabilized and ready to initiate lower intensity clinic-based services or three months have elapsed.
35
PLWOH Care-as-usual (CAU) Study Arm
Participants will receive standard discharge care as provided at Tshepong Hospital during the study. This currently includes discharge counseling from a trained discharge counselor and will be provided with a follow-up return date (usually two weeks post-hospital). Discharge counseling will include a review of discharge medications and instructions regarding follow-up care visits.
34
Total180

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyDeath prior to hospital discharge8501
Overall StudyExtended hospital stay0100
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0413
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0140

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPLWOH Care-as-usual (CAU) Study ArmTotalPLWH Home Link Study ArmPLWH Care-as-usual (CAU) Study ArmPLWOH Home Link Study Arm
Advanced HIV at admission
Missing
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Advanced HIV at admission
N/A - HIV negative
34 Participants69 Participants0 Participants0 Participants35 Participants
Advanced HIV at admission
No
0 Participants32 Participants13 Participants19 Participants0 Participants
Advanced HIV at admission
Yes
0 Participants78 Participants41 Participants37 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
5 Participants15 Participants2 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
29 Participants165 Participants53 Participants54 Participants29 Participants
Alcohol use
2-3 per week
0 Participants3 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Alcohol use
2-4 per month
3 Participants9 Participants4 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Alcohol use
4 or more per week
0 Participants11 Participants7 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
Alcohol use
Monthly or less
9 Participants39 Participants12 Participants9 Participants9 Participants
Alcohol use
Never
22 Participants118 Participants30 Participants42 Participants24 Participants
CES-D 105 units on a scale6 units on a scale5 units on a scale6 units on a scale6 units on a scale
Duration of hospitalization6 days6 days7 days6 days4 days
Food security
Food insecure
3 Participants60 Participants33 Participants9 Participants15 Participants
Food security
Food secure
31 Participants120 Participants22 Participants47 Participants20 Participants
HIV status at admission
HIV-negative
34 Participants69 Participants0 Participants0 Participants35 Participants
HIV status at admission
HIV-positive without reported prior knowledge
0 Participants5 Participants3 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
HIV status at admission
Known HIV-positive on admission
0 Participants106 Participants52 Participants54 Participants0 Participants
HIV stigma scale21 units on a scale22 units on a scale21 units on a scale
Modified social support (scaled score)100 scaled score100 scaled score100 scaled score100 scaled score100 scaled score
Most recent CD4 count (result within the last 6 months)
200-349
0 Participants13 Participants6 Participants7 Participants0 Participants
Most recent CD4 count (result within the last 6 months)
350-499
0 Participants22 Participants9 Participants13 Participants0 Participants
Most recent CD4 count (result within the last 6 months)
<50
0 Participants27 Participants14 Participants13 Participants0 Participants
Most recent CD4 count (result within the last 6 months)
50-199
0 Participants28 Participants16 Participants12 Participants0 Participants
Most recent CD4 count (result within the last 6 months)
Missing
0 Participants21 Participants10 Participants11 Participants0 Participants
Most recent CD4 count (result within the last 6 months)
N/A - HIV negative
34 Participants69 Participants0 Participants0 Participants35 Participants
On ART at admission
Missing
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
On ART at admission
N/A - HIV negative
34 Participants69 Participants0 Participants0 Participants35 Participants
On ART at admission
No
0 Participants41 Participants26 Participants15 Participants0 Participants
On ART at admission
Yes
0 Participants69 Participants28 Participants41 Participants0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
34 Participants180 Participants55 Participants56 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants116 Participants40 Participants37 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants64 Participants15 Participants19 Participants16 Participants
Viral load result
050-999
0 Participants26 Participants13 Participants13 Participants0 Participants
Viral load result
1000+
0 Participants58 Participants35 Participants23 Participants0 Participants
Viral load result
<50
0 Participants26 Participants7 Participants19 Participants0 Participants
Viral load result
Missing
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Viral load result
N/A - HIV negative
34 Participants69 Participants0 Participants0 Participants35 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
15 / 6317 / 628 / 358 / 35
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 550 / 560 / 350 / 34
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 550 / 560 / 350 / 34

Outcome results

Primary

Mortality at 6 Months

Number of deaths from any cause.

Time frame: 6 months after hospital discharge

Population: Analysis population excludes those who were late exclusions from the primary trial due to death prior to discharge or an extended hospital stay

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PLWH Home Link Study ArmMortality at 6 Months4 Participants
PLWH Care-as-usual (CAU) Study ArmMortality at 6 Months10 Participants
PLWOH Home Link Study ArmMortality at 6 Months3 Participants
PLWOH Care-as-usual (CAU) Study ArmMortality at 6 Months4 Participants
Secondary

Cost of Care

Participant-reported out-of-pocket costs for medical care

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks post-hospital discharge

Population: Data not collected for specific study outcome

Secondary

Feasibility of Clinical Trial as Assessed by Enrollment Percentage

Percentage of approached and eligible individuals who enroll.

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks

Population: Among all screened participants who met eligibility criteria (pre-randomization).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PLWH Home Link Study ArmFeasibility of Clinical Trial as Assessed by Enrollment Percentage195 Participants
Secondary

Feasibility of Clinical Trial as Assessed by Percentage of Participants With Complete Follow-up

Feasibility of clinical trial will be determined by the percentage of participants with complete follow-up.

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks

Population: Analysis population excludes those who were late exclusions from the primary trial due to death prior to discharge or an extended hospital stay

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PLWH Home Link Study ArmFeasibility of Clinical Trial as Assessed by Percentage of Participants With Complete Follow-up55 Participants
PLWH Care-as-usual (CAU) Study ArmFeasibility of Clinical Trial as Assessed by Percentage of Participants With Complete Follow-up51 Participants
PLWOH Home Link Study ArmFeasibility of Clinical Trial as Assessed by Percentage of Participants With Complete Follow-up30 Participants
PLWOH Care-as-usual (CAU) Study ArmFeasibility of Clinical Trial as Assessed by Percentage of Participants With Complete Follow-up31 Participants
Secondary

Feasibility of Intervention as Assessed by Participant Program Completion

The number of intervention arm participants with home visit #1 completed, completion of the 12 week follow-up, and vital status ascertainment at 6 months.

Time frame: Up to 6 months

Population: Feasibility of the intervention assessed among intervention arm participants only. This outcome not assessed among CAU participants.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PLWH Home Link Study ArmFeasibility of Intervention as Assessed by Participant Program Completion50 Participants
PLWOH Home Link Study ArmFeasibility of Intervention as Assessed by Participant Program Completion27 Participants
Secondary

Mortality at 12 Months

Number of deaths from any cause.

Time frame: 12 months after hospital discharge

Population: Analysis population excludes those who were late exclusions from the primary trial due to death prior to discharge or an extended hospital stay

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PLWH Home Link Study ArmMortality at 12 Months7 Participants
PLWH Care-as-usual (CAU) Study ArmMortality at 12 Months12 Participants
PLWOH Home Link Study ArmMortality at 12 Months8 Participants
PLWOH Care-as-usual (CAU) Study ArmMortality at 12 Months7 Participants
Secondary

Number of Nights of Hospital Readmission

Number of nights spent in hospital post-initial discharge (among those with at least one readmission)

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks post-hospital discharge

Population: Among those with at least one readmission

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PLWH Home Link Study ArmNumber of Nights of Hospital Readmission9 nights
PLWH Care-as-usual (CAU) Study ArmNumber of Nights of Hospital Readmission11.5 nights
PLWOH Home Link Study ArmNumber of Nights of Hospital Readmission10 nights
PLWOH Care-as-usual (CAU) Study ArmNumber of Nights of Hospital Readmission11.5 nights
Secondary

Number of Outpatient Follow-up Care Encounters

Number of outpatient follow-up care (clinic or home visit) encounters

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks post-hospital discharge

Population: Analysis population excludes those who were late exclusions from the primary trial due to death prior to discharge or an extended hospital stay

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PLWH Home Link Study ArmNumber of Outpatient Follow-up Care Encounters11 visits
PLWH Care-as-usual (CAU) Study ArmNumber of Outpatient Follow-up Care Encounters3.5 visits
PLWOH Home Link Study ArmNumber of Outpatient Follow-up Care Encounters7 visits
PLWOH Care-as-usual (CAU) Study ArmNumber of Outpatient Follow-up Care Encounters4 visits
Secondary

Number of Participants Completing In-depth Interviews to Assess Acceptability of the Intervention

Acceptability questionnaire and in-depth interviews with 7 acceptability domains for healthcare workers (HCWs) and participants and in-depth interviews for HCWs and participants. An a priori code book will be developed that reflects key analytic concepts of predisposing, enabling, and need characteristics from the Andersen Behavioral Model. During the process of reading and coding of transcripts using this initial coding scheme, additional codes may be added to document emerging themes of interest.

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks post-hospital discharge

Population: Intervention arm participants who completed in-depth interviews. Care-as-usual (CAU) arm participants were not interviewed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PLWH Home Link Study ArmNumber of Participants Completing In-depth Interviews to Assess Acceptability of the Intervention33 participants
PLWOH Home Link Study ArmNumber of Participants Completing In-depth Interviews to Assess Acceptability of the Intervention8 participants
Secondary

Time (Days) to Any Non-acute Follow-up

Time to first clinic or home visit post-hospital discharge.

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks post-hospital discharge

Population: Among participants with at least one clinic or home visit

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PLWH Home Link Study ArmTime (Days) to Any Non-acute Follow-up13 days
PLWH Care-as-usual (CAU) Study ArmTime (Days) to Any Non-acute Follow-up28 days
PLWOH Home Link Study ArmTime (Days) to Any Non-acute Follow-up13 days
PLWOH Care-as-usual (CAU) Study ArmTime (Days) to Any Non-acute Follow-up31 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026