Skip to content

Robotic-assisted Percutaneous Access

Robotic-assisted Percutaneous Access: Interventional, Non-randomized, Open-label, Non-comparative and First-in-Man Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04435132
Enrollment
5
Registered
2020-06-17
Start date
2018-08-07
Completion date
2018-11-01
Last updated
2020-06-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Stone

Keywords

PCNL, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Brief summary

This is a first-in-man (FIM) study to show feasibility and safety profile of the newly developed robotic device for percutaneous access in PCNL surgery. Patients with renal stone disease who had standard indications for prone PCNL were included in the study. PCNL was conducted with percutaneous puncture with the aid of robotic device with the use of intra-operative fluoroscopy. 5 patients were recruited in this pilot study over a period of 3 months. Punctures were performed by the board-qualified urologist.

Detailed description

All patients underwent preoperative investigations and imaging study (CT Urogram/Intravenous Pyelography) done prior to the operation as per standard operation preparation. Intraoperatively fluoroscopic imaging was done for the patients and the images were synchronized to the software. Robotic arm was placed on the site of surgery as for prone PCNL and diaphragm of the arm was centred over the site of desire calyx of entry. A needle was engaged into the centre of the diaphragm and using the software the need was aligned in the line of puncture automatically based on the fluoroscopic images. After the alignment was done the needle was advanced manually by the surgeon until the entry was confirmed by efflux of urine from the puncture needle. After the entry was confirmed a standard PCNL using 24 F or 30 F Balloon dilator was performed and stone cleared using Cyberwand/ Shockpulse etc. All the intraoperative and perioperative parameters as mentioned in the data collection form was measured. Results was analysed with the main focus on time of obtaining the puncture, accuracy of puncture, radiation exposure time till calyceal entry which was confirmed by free flow of urine and for any complications. Patients aged between 21 to 75 years old who were diagnosed with kidney stone diseas and planned for prone PCNL with indication for surgery as per standard of care were recruited. They understood the purpose of testing and offered their voluntary and informed consent. The robotic device i.e. ANT lesses the learning curve of percutaneous access as it reduces the need for surgeon's visualization of the calyceal system and the needle alignment. It also improved efficiency as there is less dependence on human skills during the procedure. As a whole, the FIM trial was a success. The performance of the ANT system during the trial was satisfactory. The robot alignment time is less than 30 seconds. Total puncture time was around 6 minutes and no AEs were reported.

Interventions

DEVICEPCL under fluoroscopy with the aid of the robotic device

During the surgery, the robot was positioned over the estimated insertion point. It was aligned to be parallel to the fluoroscope imaging plane as much as possible. The needle is to be placed through the holder, and slightly penetrate the surface of the skin. An x-ray image is then taken to ensure that the whole device can be seen on the screen. Image calibration is then performed through the software GUI. After which, the clinician is also to perform needle tip selection. After which, needle alignment will then be performed. Once needle alignment is complete, the clinician will then advance the trocar needle into the patient's body, using the fluoroscopy to judge the penetration depth. Once the target has been reached, the needle style is to be extracted. The indication of leakage of fluid through the outer needle confirms the success of the procedure.

Sponsors

University of Malaya
CollaboratorOTHER
NDR Medical Technology Pte Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Patients will undergo prone PCNL under fluoroscopic guidance and with the aid of the robotic device. They will then be admitted to inpatient ward as per standard of care for PCNL.

Intervention model description

Recruitment was carried out in University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) Hospital clinics and impatient wards. 5 patients were recruited with no preferred selection for gender or race. Patients recruited were set to be between 21 to 75 years of age. Patients presenting to to clinic or admitted to ward for renal stone disease were assessed for indications of PCNL. Patients were assessed for renal stone disease as per standard of care - imaging study with CT scan, renal function, clinical assessment of fitness and suitability for prone PCNL. Once patients were planned for prone PCNL, they will be informed about this study, the use of robotic device, potential benefits and complications by study investigators. If they are agreeable to informed consent, they will be recruited into the study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 21 to 75 years * Diagnosed with kidney stone disease and planned for prone PCNL with indication for surgery as per standard of care * Subject who understand the purpose of testing, voluntary and informed consent, patients undergoing invasive imaging follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

* Bleeding disorders * Patient on anticoagulation/antiplatelets drugs * Pyonephrosis * Pregnant women * Not able to have prone position for the procedure due to comorbidities * Moderate to severe renal failure * The patient's life expectancy is less than 12 months * Poor compliance and patients unable to complete the study in accordance with the requirements.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of needle insertion attempts to obtain accessDuring procedureNumber of attempts before successfully reaching the calyx
Needle insertion timeDuring procedureTime taken for PCNL procedure
Needle alignment timeDuring procedureTime taken for needle alignment
Time to targetDuring procedureTime taken for the needle to reach the calyx, from on the skin to successful needle targeting
Radiation dosage from placement of robot to efflux of urineDuring procedureA measure of the radiation exposed during the surgical procedure
Radiation dosage from placement of robot to successful needle target via image confirmationDuring procedureA measure of the radiation exposed during the surgical procedure

Countries

Malaysia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026