Skip to content

Effects of Trunk Exercise on Trunk Control and Balance in Persons With Stroke

Effects of Trunk Exercise on Unstable Surface on Trunk Control and Balance in Persons With Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04434443
Enrollment
35
Registered
2020-06-16
Start date
2018-08-09
Completion date
2019-10-06
Last updated
2020-06-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Balance Impairment, Cerebrovascular Accident

Keywords

stroke, balance, Trunk exercise, Trunk control, standing

Brief summary

This study examined the effects of trunk exercise on unstable surfaces on trunk control and balance for persons in the sub-acute stage of stroke. The hypothesis was that, compared to upper limb exercises in well supported sitting position, this exercise would lead to better trunk control and sitting and standing balance. The results supported the hypothesis.

Detailed description

Inpatients in the sub-acute stage of stroke were randomly assigned to receive upper limb range of motion exercises in well supported sitting position or trunk exercises on unstable surfaces in supine and sitting, 30 min per session, 2 sessions per week for 6 weeks, in addition to their daily conventional stroke rehabilitation. Sensorimotor functions, including hand grip strength, plantar sensitivity, stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement and Fugl-Meyer lower extremity motor scale, and clinical outcome assessments, including Trunk Impairment Scale and 6-meter walk test, were conducted by a blinded assessor. Biomechanical outcome measures included center of pressure area while maintaining static posture and peak displacement while leaning forward, and the average speed of the unaffected arm raising (to represent the ability to provide a stable foundation for focal movement). These measures were taken in sitting without foot support, sitting with foot support and standing to reflect trunk control, sitting balance and standing balance, respectively.

Interventions

OTHERtrunk exercise on unstable exercise

Participants would receive exercises on unstable surface. Started from supine position, participants had abdominal drawer-in maneuver with soft foam under the pelvic. Lower trunk rotation, bridging and abdominal muscles isometric contraction exercises were also used in this exercise during supine position, with different unstable surfaces used. Including soft foam under the feet, then progressed to BOSU ball under the feet, then progressed to the a BOSU ball under the feet combined with pelvic on soft foam. During sitting, BOSU ball and Swiss ball were used as unstable surface. Pelvic anterior-posterior tilt, lateral tilting, rotation, lifting, and stepping with arm swing were used in this position.

OTHERUpper limb range of motion exercise

Upper limb range of motion exercise with trunk fully supported

Sponsors

Tainan Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare
CollaboratorOTHER
National Cheng Kung University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome assessor not aware of group assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age: between 20-80 years old * first time stroke * could sit without back support at least 20 seconds * could understand and follow experimental instructions

Exclusion criteria

* medically unstable * other neuromuscular/musculoskeletal problems that would affect balance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Center of pressure6 weeksrange of displacement (cm)
Angular velocity of the non-affected arm raising6 weeksmean velocity

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Trunk Impairment Scale6 weekstotal score (0-23); higher scores mean better outcome
6-meter walking tests6 weekstime (sec) to walk 6 meters

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026