Skip to content

Comparison of the Effects of Home Exercise and Isokinetic Exercise Program in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome Patients

Comparison of the Effects of Home Exercise Program and Isokinetic Exercise Program on Pain, Muscle Strength, Functionality, Sense of Proprioception and Quality of Life in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04434183
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-06-16
Start date
2018-05-30
Completion date
2018-11-30
Last updated
2020-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Home Exercise, Quality of Life

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects of home exercise program and isokinetic exercise program on pain, muscle strength, functionality, proprioception sensation and quality of life in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome.

Detailed description

The study was designed prospectively. A total of 50 patients with subacromial impingement syndrome according to clinical and MRI findings with shoulder pain for at least 3 months were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. The first group (isokinetic exercise group, n = 25) was given isokinetic exercise. The second group(home exercise group, n=25) was given home exercise program. Patients were evaluated before and after treatment and 3 months after the end of treatment. In the evaluation, VAS, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Constant Murley Scoring, Shoulder Disability Questionnaire, Health Assessment Questionnaire, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Humic Norm II isokinetic device were used. At statistically evaluation of data Student T Test and Mann Whitney U tests were used. In qualitative datas comparison Ki-Kare Test was used. Significance was evaluated at the level of p< 0.05.

Interventions

DEVICEExercises of rehabilitation

Compare and evaluate of the effects of the routin physical medicine and rehabilitation programs in impingement patients

Sponsors

Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Shoulder pain and functional disability at least 6 months

Exclusion criteria

* Instability of shoulder, Stage 2-3 adhesive capsulitis, tendinitis or bursitis, cervical radiculopathy, underwent surgery, norological diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of shoulder examination findings3 monthsThe investigators evaluated to pre-treatment, intermediate post-treatment, and late post-treatment shoulder examination findings. The investigators used to painful arc test consisting of 13 questions that scored from zero to ten.
Assessment of shoulder functions3 monthsThe investigators evaluated to pre-treatment, intermediate post-treatment, and late post-treatment shoulder functions and muscle strenght. The investigators used to Constant-Murley functional evaluate scale consisting of four parameters that scored from zero to one hundered.
Assessment of muscle strenght3 monthsThe investigators evaluated it with isokinetic cybex dynamometer. The isokinetic cybex dynamometer assessments using newton-meter for muscle strenght and angle degree for velocity measurements.
Assessment of quality of life3 monthsThe investigators evaluated to pre-treatment, intermediate post-treatment, and late post-treatment quality of life values with Pittsburg sleep quality index. The Pittsburg sleep quality index consisting of 23 questions that scored from zero to three.
Assessment of sense of proprioseption3 monthsThe investigators evaluated it with isokinetic cybex dynamometer. The isokinetic cybex dynamometer assessments using angle degree for sense of position.
Assessment of shoulder pain3 monthsThe investigators evaluated to pre-treatment, intermediate post-treatment, and late post-treatment for shoulder pain. The investigators used to visual analog score for pain that scored from zero to ten.
Assessment of shoulder disability3 monthsThe investigators evaluated to pre-treatment, intermediate post-treatment, and late post-treatment for shoulder disability. The investigators used to shoulder disability questionnare consisting of 16 questions that scored yes or no. Calculation; score = \[Yes counts / (Yes counts + No counts)\]x100. The score seems, zero point is maximal fine health and 100 points (maximal point) is poor health.
Assessment of physical health situation3 monthsThe investigators evaluated to pre-treatment, intermediate post-treatment, and late post-treatment for physical health situation. The investigators used to health evaluated inventory. The inventroy consisting of 20 questions that scored from zero to three per question. Zero point is maximal fine health and 60 points are maximal poor health.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026