Aphasia, Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
Stroke, Aphasia, brain stimulation, communication problems, speech and language therapy
Brief summary
62 patients who are one year post stroke and have Aphasia as a result of that stroke will be recruited. Participants will have 4 assessment sessions and 15 treatment sessions. The TDCS will be to right Inferior Frontal Gyrus (IFG) (25 active, 25 sham) for 15 days. A combined semantic feature analysis/phonological components analysis treatment will be paired with the stimulation. Two assessment sessions will be pretreatment, 1 session immediately post-treatment, and 1 session at 3 months follow-up.
Detailed description
Our long-term goal is to develop safe and effective treatments for the communication problems of Aphasia due to stroke that restore patients to higher levels of functioning, decrease disability, and promote higher quality of life. While language therapy for aphasia is effective, improvements are typically slow, and gains may be small. Noninvasive brain stimulation has been suggested as a method to enhance outcomes from language therapy. This study will examine whether outcomes for language therapy with brain stimulation are different from outcomes for language therapy without brain stimulation in people with aphasia. Our central hypotheses are (1) targeted right hemisphere HDtDCS (RH-HD-tDCS) administered in combination with language treatment will result in greater changes in naming accuracy than language treatment with the sham RH-HD-tDCS (2) RH-HD-tDCS plus language treatment will result in greater increases in communication within the affected hemisphere compared to language treatment plus sham RH-HD-tDCS (3) RH-HD-tDCS plus language treatment will result in greater increases in perilesional areas working together immediately post-treatment compared to language treatment plus sham RH-HD-tDCS
Interventions
DEVICEActive Comparator: Experimental: Active cathodal tDCS + language training
Cathodal tDCS raises neuronal membrane potentials, leading to decreased probability of depolarization from incoming stimuli. Speech and Language training involves a combined semantic feature analysis and phonological components analysis treatment.
BEHAVIORALSham Comparator: Placebo cathodal tDCS + Speech and language
Speech and Language training involves a combined semantic feature analysis and phonological components analysis treatment. .
Sponsors
University of New Mexico
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. aged 25-85 2. must be greater than 6 months post-stroke 3. must have a diagnosis of aphasia based on impaired performance on the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised, Boston Naming Test, or during discourse production 4. must be left-hemisphere dominant as demonstrated by aphasia onset subsequent to left hemisphere damage 5. must be stimulable for naming
Exclusion criteria
1. comorbid neurological disease. 2. damage to the anterior right hemisphere. 3. significant mood disorder. 4. substance/alcohol dependence or abuse within the past year 5. presence of any implanted electrical device or contraindications to tDCS or MRI 6. recent medical instability (within 4 weeks) 7. pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Picture Naming of trained items | 3 months | Change in naming of pictures of trained items; 60 pictured items; higher score indicates improvement |
| Naming Response Time of trained items Scales - IV (WAIS-IV; Wechsler, Coalson, & Railford, 2008) | 3 months | Change in response time of naming of pictures of trained items; 0-20 seconds, decreased response time indicates improvement Scales - IV (WAIS-IV; Wechsler, Coalson, \& Railford, 2008) |
| Naming Efficiency of trained items | 3 months | Change in efficiency of naming of pictures of trained items; median response time divided by proportion correct naming; smaller numbers indicate greater efficiency |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Discourse informativeness - Main Concept Production | 3 months | Change in discourse informativeness as measured by main concept scores; increased values indicate improvement |
| Efficiency of discourse informativeness - Main Concept Production | 3 months | Change in efficiency of discourse informativeness; accurate and complete main concepts produced over the time of discourse elicitation (ACs/min); larger numbers indicate greater efficiency |
| Picture Naming of untrained items - Boston Naming Test | 3 months | Change in naming of pictures of untrained items; 60 pictured items; higher score indicates improvement |
| Naming Response Time of untrained items - Boston Naming Test | 3 months | Change in response time of naming of pictures of untrained items; 0-20 seconds, decreased response time indicates improvement |
| Naming Efficiency of untrained items - Boston Naming Test | 3 months | Change in efficiency of naming of pictures of untrained items; median response time divided by proportion correct naming; smaller numbers indicate greater efficiency |
Countries
United States
Contacts
CONTACTJessica Richardson, Ph.D.
CONTACTHoney Hubbard
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJessica Richardson, Ph.D.
University of New Mexico
Outcome results
None listed