Skip to content

Effects of tDCS in M1 and DLPFC on Pain Processing in Healthy Volunteers

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Primary Cortex and Prefrontal Dorsolateral Cortex in Pain Processing on Healthy Volunteers: A Triple Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04432363
Enrollment
30
Registered
2020-06-16
Start date
2020-06-06
Completion date
2020-07-25
Last updated
2020-10-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain Processing in Healthy Volunteers

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of a direct current applied transcranial over two cortical areas on healthy volunteers' pain processing.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial direct current stimulation

Direct current application over the scalp to stimulate and change the excitability of the cortical areas underneath the electrodes (in this case left primary motor cortex and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex).

Sponsors

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Three groups cross over study with two intervention groups and one sham group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 40 years * Comprehension of the study tasks

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of pain in the previous 6 months * Altered sensitivity in the tested regions * Intolerance to electrotherapy * Presence of pacemakers or any other implanted device * Ulcers or scars in the skin at the location of the electrodes * Treatment with direct current stimulation within one week * Pregnancy * Frequent headaches * Epilepsy * History of neuromuscular disease * Previous clinical history of cervical surgery * Injuries or surgery affecting the upper limb * diabetes mellitus * Cardiovascular diseases * Oncological diseases * Consumption of analgesic drugs 7 days before the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Conditioned Pain ModulationPre-intervention and immediately after treatmentPain pressure threshold change after a painful ischemic stimulus
Pain pressure algometer temporal summationPre-intervention and immediately after treatmentChange in pain perceived between the first and tenth painful pressure stimulus

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neural mechanosensitivityPre-intervention and immediately after treatmentMeasurement of range of motion achieved until the perception of tension
Pain pressure thresholdPre-intervention and immediately after treatmentMeasurement of pressure applied until the perception of pain
Isometric grip strengthPre-intervention and immediately after treatmentMaximal pressure achieved in a isometric gripping task
Cold hyperalgesia with a cold packPre-intervention and immediately after treatmentPain rated in a visual analogue scale after 10 seconds of a cold stimulus
Pain pressure tolerancePre-intervention and immediately after treatmentMeasurement of maximal painful pressure tolerate using a pressure algometer

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026