Skip to content

Partially Covered Metal Stents Efficacy in Biliary Drainage of Malignant Extra-hepatic Biliary Obstruction

Partially Covered Metal Stents Efficacy in the Biliary Drainage of Malignant Extra-hepatic Biliary Obstruction, a Multicentric Randomized Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04431427
Acronym
METARSI
Enrollment
300
Registered
2020-06-16
Start date
2021-02-28
Completion date
2022-08-31
Last updated
2021-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Biliary Obstruction

Keywords

Malignant biliary obstruction

Brief summary

Malignant obstructions of the bile duct are not rare. The most common and accepted method for biliary drainage is endoscopic stent placement. There are three types of metal stents: fully covered (FC), partially covered (PC) and uncovered (U). PC-SEMS have been recently introduced and compared to FC-SEMS they seem to have a lower risk of migration, although data in the literature are discordant. Therefore the investigators will randomize the participants with biliary obstruction in 2 groups according to the type of stent used: PC-SEMS or U-SEMS. After metallic biliary stent insertion, enrolled patients will be followed for 12 months.

Detailed description

Malignant obstructions of the bile duct are generally caused by: adenocarcinoma of the Vater ampulla, pancreas head cancer, cholangiocarcinoma and external compression secondary to lymph node (LN) metastasis. The management of jaundice and cholangitis, as a result of bile stenosis, is crucial in this group of patients. The most common and accepted method for biliary drainage is endoscopic stent placement with plastic stents or self-expandable metal stents (SEMS). In recent times, the use of SEMS has become more common as it provides longer times of patency and a reduced risk of adverse events such as cholangitic episodes. There are three types of metal stents: fully covered (FC), partially covered (PC) and uncovered (U). PC-SEMS have been recently introduced and compared to FC-SEMS they seem to have a lower risk of migration, however different randomized and non-randomized studies have compared the outcome of U-SEMS vs FC-SEMS with between uncovered and covered stents have produced different results regarding the cumulative patency of stents and endoscopic re-intervention rates. To date, there are few and discordant prospective data on the outcomes of PC-SEMS use in malignant biliary obstructions. Therefore, the investigators will randomize the participants with biliary obstruction in 2 groups according to the type of stent used: PC-SEMS or U-SEMS (T0 timing). Then the participants will be followed for total period of 12 months. 2 different timings of follow-up will be considered: \- T1: it will start after stent insertion. The biliary drainage will be considered effective, according to the European guidelines, when the bilirubin values will be \< or = 2 mg/dl for a period of at least 6 weeks if the initial bilirubin values were higher than 10 mg/dl or 3 weeks if at the beginning were lower than 10 mg/dl; After this first phase, all the enrolled patients will be divided in 2 groups according to their fitness for chemiotherapy: FIT and UNFIT Group. FIT group: blood test (including total bilirubin, gamma-GT) will be done for follow-up study once every three months. UNFIT Group: blood test (including total bilirubin, gamma-GT) will be done for follow-up study after 3, 9 and 12 months.

Interventions

DEVICEBiliary drainage with PC-SEMS

partially covered metallic biliary stent insertion during ERCP

DEVICEBiliary drainage with U-SEMS

Uncovered metallic biliary stent insertion during ERCP

Sponsors

Santi Mangiafico
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

•The patients who had malignant biliary obstruction with a estimated survival \>4 months

Exclusion criteria

* The patients who had resectable biliary malignancy * The patients who had hilar obstruction * The patients who had duodenal obstruction * The patients who had International Normalized Ratio (INR)\>1.5 * The patients who did not give informed consent * The patients who had technically difficult structure for Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Re-intervention rate12 monthsEvaluation in both arms of the re-intervention rate considered as any procedure needed for a new drainage of the biliary tree, endoscopic or percutaneous, to replace a dysfunctional stent.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of patency, migration and adverse events rate12 monthsevaluation of patency, migration and adverse events rate for each arm

Contacts

Primary ContactSILVIA COCCA, MD
cocca.silvia@aou.mo.it00393756213301
Backup ContactSanti Mangiafico, MD
mangiafico.santi@aou.mo.it

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026