Skip to content

Economic Assessment of STarting Endoscopic Robotic Groin Hernia Repair

Retrospective Comparative Study on Costs of Conventional Versus Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Repair

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04431271
Acronym
EASTER
Enrollment
677
Registered
2020-06-16
Start date
2020-06-01
Completion date
2020-07-31
Last updated
2020-08-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inguinal Hernia

Brief summary

The material cost for robotic groin hernia repair is higher than for conventional laparoscopic surgery. In this study, this amount will be quantified and possible differences in early postoperative course, hospital stay and readmission rate that could influence the cost/benefit ratio for robotic groin hernia surgery will be analyzed.

Detailed description

Robot-assisted groin hernia repair has been introduced in AZ Maria Middelares hospital since September 2016. In these procedures, the daVinci robot is being used to perform minimal invasive repair of these hernias. At the moment, this technique is frequently being used for groin hernia repair. Literature shows a clear benefit of robot-assisted versus open repair. Hospital stay decreases and complications are less frequently observed in patients who underwent minimal invasive repair (Henriksen NA et al., 2018). On the other hand, the benefits of robot-assisted repair are less obvious compared to conventional laparoscopy. Many robot-trained surgeons are in favor of robot-assisted repair, but current literature is still inconclusive about the economic feasibility of robot-assisted groin hernia repair as standard of care. This retrospective observational study is primarily designed to analyze the additional cost of robot-assisted groin hernia repair compared to conventional laparoscopic repair. A cost-benefit analysis will be carried out for groin hernia repairs performed by the same surgeon (Dr. Filip Muysoms) in the period 2016-2019. As primary endpoint, direct costs related to the introduction of robot-assisted groin hernia repair will be analyzed. These are: material costs, costs related to hospital stay, honoraria and costs related to intrahospital complications. A comparison will be made between conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted groin hernia repair. As secondary endpoint, indirect costs will be compared between both groups. These include costs related to late complications and readmissions related to the index operation.

Interventions

PROCEDURERobot-assisted hernia repair

Inguinal hernia repair was performed using the DaVinci Xi robotic system

Sponsors

Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria Middelares
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients * underwent uni-or bilateral groin hernia repair in the period 2015- 2019 * surgery through minimal invasive repair

Exclusion criteria

* open surgery or conversion from minimal-invasive to open surgery * combined procedures * age below 18 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Direct costsImmediately post hospital dischargeMaterial costs, hospitalization costs, specialist fees and costs related to early complications

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Indirect costs0- 42 days postoperativelyLate complication costs, readmission costs

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026