Skip to content

Doxapram Therapy in Preterm Infants (DOXA Trial)

Doxapram Versus Placebo in Preterm Newborns: An International Double Blinded Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04430790
Enrollment
396
Registered
2020-06-12
Start date
2020-06-15
Completion date
2034-05-01
Last updated
2024-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Apnea of Prematurity, Respiratory Insufficiency

Keywords

Preterm infants, Hypoxia, Doxapram

Brief summary

Preterm infants often suffer from apnea of prematurity (AOP; a cessation of breathing) due to immaturity of the respiratory system. AOP can lead to oxygen shortage and a low heart rate which might harm the development of the newborn, especially the central nervous system. In order to prevent oxygen shortage, infants are treated with non-invasive respiratory support and caffeine. Despite these treatments, many preterm newborns still suffer from AOP and need invasive mechanical ventilation. Although this will result in complete resolution of AOP, invasive mechanical ventilation has the disadvantage of being a major risk of chronic lung disease and impaired neurodevelopmental outcome. Restrictive invasive ventilation is therefore advocated nowadays in preterm infants. Doxapram is a respiratory stimulant that has been administered off-label to treat AOP. Doxapram, as add-on treatment, seems to be effective in treating AOP and to prevent invasive mechanical ventilation. It is unclear if a preterm infant benefit from doxapram treatment on the longer term. This study compares doxapram to placebo and hypothesizes that doxapram will protect preterm infants from both invasive ventilation (and related lung disease) and AOP related oxygen shortage (and related impaired brain development).

Detailed description

The main objective of the trial is to investigate if doxapram is safe and effective in reducing the composite outcome of death and neurodevelopmental impairment/severe disability at 2 years corrected age as compared to placebo. This multicenter double blinded randomized placebo-controlled superiority trial will be conducted in multiple neonatal intensive care units in the Netherlands and Belgium, including 8 years follow-up. After written informed-consent the patients will be randomized into the doxapram treatment group or the placebo treatment group. Randomization will be stratified based on center and gestational age \< or \>= 26 weeks. The participating departments include Dutch and Belgian Neonatal Intensive care units. The units include both academic and non-academic level III and IV units that are specialized in the care for critically ill and preterm born infants. Postnatal ages of patients at doxapram start vary from directly after birth up to months for the most-preterm born infants. Blinded continuous doxapram or placebo (glucose 5%) will be infused as long as needed. Therapy is down titrated or stopped based on the patients' condition. If endotracheal intubation is needed study drug is stopped. After extubation study drug may be restarted. Switch to gastro-enteral administration is allowed if no iv-access is needed for other reasons. Next to study drug infusion, there will be no other study-related interventions. All outcome variables are already collected as standard of care. In a subset of patients doxapram plasma levels will be determined to validate the doxapram pharmacokinetic (PK) model. Blood will only be collected during routine blood sampling, with a maximum amount of 0.6 ml. Economic and cost-effectiveness evaluation will be performed. The national protocol for preterm birth advices follow-up at 2, 5.5 and 8 years respectively, as in the current study. Additional questionnaires will be used to collect data on the quality of life of patients and their parents.

Interventions

Loading dose and continuous doxapram infusion.

DRUGPlacebo

Loading dose and continuous placebo infusion.

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
CollaboratorOTHER
Nederlands Neonataal Netwerk (N3), the Netherlands
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
CollaboratorOTHER
Maternal, Infant, Child and Youth Research Network (MICYRN)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Erasmus Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Doxapram versus placebo

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
23 Weeks to 29 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Admitted to the neonatal intensvie care unit (NICU) of one of the participating centres * Written informed consent of both parents or legal representatives * Gestational age at birth \< 29 weeks * Caffeine therapy, adequately dosed (see also under co-medication) * Optimal Non-invasively supported with nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) or ventilation ((S)NIPPV, NIV-NAVA, BIPAP/Duopap, SIPAP) * Apnea that require a medical intervention as judged by the attending physician

Exclusion criteria

* Previous use of open label doxapram * Use of theophylline (to replace doxapram) * Chromosomal defects (e.g. trisomy 13, 18, or 21) * Major congenital malformations that: compromise lung function (e.g. surfactant protein deficiencies, congenital diaphragmatic hernia); result in chronic ventilation (e.g. Pierre Robin sequence); increase the risk of death or adverse neurodevelopmental outcome (congenital cerebral malformations, chromosomal abnormalities); * Palliative care or treatment limitations because of high risk of impaired outcome.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Death or severe disability2 years corrected ageDisability will be defined as cognitive delay, cerebral palsy, severe hearing loss, or bilateral blindness. Cognitive delay will be defined as a Mental Development Index score of less than 85 on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Bayley Score of Infant Development (BSID) III scores. Cerebral palsy will be diagnosed if the child had a non-progressive motor impairment characterized by abnormal muscle tone and decreased range or control of movements. The level of gross motor function will be determined with the use of the Gross Motor Function Classification System. Audiometry will be performed to determine the presence or absence of hearing loss. Blindness will be defined as a corrected visual acuity less than 20/200

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Deathuntil 36 weeks post menstrual age and until hospital dischargeDeath at 36 weeks post menstrual age and hospital mortality
Admission periodthrough study completion and until discharge home, average 3 monthsLength of stay at the intensive care, length of stay in hospital
Endotracheal intubationsDay 3, 7, 14, and 21 after start of study medicationIncidence of endotracheal intubations
Oxygenation days and complicationsDuring first hospital admittance and through study completion, average of 3 monthsNumber of days on invasive ventilation, number of days on ventilatory support (non-invasive ventilation, CPAP, humidified high flow, low flow), number of days with supplemental oxygen, respiratory complications (airleak, pneumonia, etc), use of (rescue) corticosteroids for respiratory reasons.
Gastro-intestinal outcome measuresDuring first hospital admittance and until 36 weeks post menstrual agesolitary intestinal perforation, necrotizing enterocolitis \> stage 2 according to Bell, feeding problems with need for parental feeding (days with parental feeding after inclusion), body weight (gain, length), head circumference
Broncho pulmonary dysplasia36 weeks post menstrual ageDiagnosed according to the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) criteria
Complications during neonatal periodDuring first hospital admittance or at term equivalent age (37-42 weeks postmenstrual age), average 3 monthsIncidence of late onset sepsis (culture proven or clinical suspected) and meningitis after inclusion, need for inotropes/circulatory support
Retinopathy of prematurityDuring first hospital admittance or at term equivalent age (37-42 weeks postmenstrual age), average 3 monthsGrade of retinopathy (including plus disease and need for therapy)
HearingAt term equivalent age, 37-42 weeks postmenstrual age, average 3 monthsHearing test
Additional long term outcomes2 years corrected ageReadmissions since first discharge home, weight/length/head circumference, behavioral problems (Child Behavior Checklist)
Parent reported outcome2 years corrected ageParent reported outcome with the PARCA-R (Parent Report of Children's Abilities-Revised) questionnaire (expected mean standardised scores 100 (SD 15), higher score is better outcome)
Neurological outcome measuresDuring first hospital admittance or at term equivalent age (37-42 weeks postmenstrual age), average 3 monthsIntraventricular hemorhage(IVH) (all grades, grade III-IV, venous infarction), clinical seizures, periventricular leucomalacia (PVL) \> gr 1)

Countries

Belgium, Canada, Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactSinno HP Simons, MD, PhD
s.simons@erasmusmc.nl+31641376695
Backup ContactJeroen J Hutten, MD, PhD
g.j.hutten@amsterdamumc.nl

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026