Skip to content

Phaco-UCP Versus Phaco Alone for OAG and Cataract

Phaco-UCP; Combined Phacoemulsification and Ultrasound Ciliary Plasty Versus Phacoemulsification Alone for Management of Coexisting Cataract and Open Angle Glaucoma

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04430647
Enrollment
61
Registered
2020-06-12
Start date
2018-03-01
Completion date
2020-01-30
Last updated
2020-06-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract, Glaucoma, Open-Angle

Brief summary

This study was carried out to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined phacoemulsification and Ultrasound ciliary plasty (Phaco-UCP) as a first-line surgical treatment of coexisting cataract and op /en angle glaucoma compared to phacoemulsification alone. To our knowledge, this is the first report of results of combined Phaco-UCP

Detailed description

the study involved 61 eyes of 61 patients with coexisting cataract and open angle glaucoma, 31 eyes were managed with Phaco-UCP and 30 eyes of age and sex matched patients were managed with phacoemulsification alone. Patients were randomized for either combined phacoemulsification and ultrasound ciliary plasty (Phaco-UCP) (the study group) or phacoemulsification alone (the control group). All surgeries were performed by one experienced surgeon (Y EZ). Preoperative evaluation included manifest refraction, BCVA measurement, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, gonioscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, measurement of IOP with Goldmann applanation tonometry (average of 3 readings taken). Corneal diameter (White-to-white) and axial length measurement were done using IOL Master 500 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG., Germany). Ultrasound pachymetry with Tomey SP-100 (Tomey Corp. Nagoya, Japan) and visual fields using Humphrey Field Analyzer (24-2, SITA, standard program Carl Zeiss Meditec AG., Germany) were also performed.

Interventions

PROCEDUREcombined phacoemulsification and ultrasound ciliary plasty (Phaco-UCP)

performing ultrasound ciliary plasty then performing standard phacoemulsification

standard phacoemulsification for catarct extraction

Sponsors

Dar Alshifa hospital Kuwait
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Ameera Gamal Abdelhameed
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients diagnosed with POAG or pseudoexfoliation glaucoma with coexisting visually significant cataract that required phacoemulsification

Exclusion criteria

* patients with any other type of glaucoma, including narrow angle glaucoma, neovascular, uveitic or angle recession glaucoma, patients with advanced glaucoma characterized by advanced optic disc cupping or visual field damage, history of glaucoma or intraocular surgery and other ocular diseases that would affect safety or interfere with the procedure. We also excluded patients with incomplete follow-up or missing data

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
reduction in intraocular pressure18 months postoperativeQualified Success was defined as an IOP reduction of at least 20 % from baseline value, with an IOP that is between 6 - 21 mm Hg, without the need for additional antiglaucoma medications or glaucoma surgery
reduction in r the number of antiglaucoma medications.18 months postoperativereduction of the number of antiglaucoma medication or at least no increase in the number

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
BCVA improvement18 months postoperativeimprovement of best corrected visual acuity
intraoperative and postoperative complications.intraoperative and 18 months postoperativehyphema or vitreous hemorrhage necessitating surgical intervention, choroidal hemorrhage, chronic uveitis, endophthalmitis, hypotony (IOP ≤ 5 mm Hg), phthisis, IOL dislocation, and retinal detachment.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026