Lisfranc Injury, Sprain of Foot
Conditions
Keywords
Lisfranc injury, Weightbearing radiographs, Stress fluoroscopy, Homerun screw
Brief summary
In this multicenter cohort study, the stability of non-displaced Lisfranc injuries as well as their outcomes will be evaluated.
Detailed description
Injuries to the tarsometatarsal joints (Lisfranc injuries) that are non-displaced on non-weightbearing radiographs and CT are common injuries. To refer these injuries to the right treatment, evaluating their stability is essential. For this purpose, both weightbearing radiographs and stress fluoroscopy have been proposed. However, there is no consensus concerning both the use and interpretation of weightbearing radiographs and no standardized technique and interpretation of stress fluoroscopy in non-displaced Lisfranc injuries. In the current study, participants will be assigned to non-operative or operative treatment based on Lisfranc joint stability evaluation by weightbearing radiographs. All Patients with negative weightbearing radiographs will be treated conservatively. In addition, their injured feet will be evaluated by manual stress fluoroscopy. Depending on the result of the stress fluoroscopy (positive/negative), the conservatively treated patients will be assigned to 2 cohorts, whose outcomes will be compared. Patients with positive weightbearing radiographs will be treated operatively by minimally invasive stabilization of the midfoot (eg. isolated homerun screw). The operatively treated patients will be followed up as an independent cohort.
Interventions
PROCEDUREMinimally invasive stabilization of Lisfranc injuries
Patients with positive weightbearing radiographs will be operated by minimally invasive stabilization (eg, isolated homerun screw)
PROCEDUREConservative treatment
Patients with negative weightbearing radiographs will be treated conservatively
Sponsors
Oslo University Hospital
Ostfold Hospital Trust
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Masking description
The participants will be blinded for the result of the stress fluoroscopy.
Intervention model description
Participants are evaluated by weightbearing radiographs. Patients with no signs of dislocation on the weightbearing radiographs will undergo stress fluoroscopy. Patients with negative stress fluoroscopy are allocated to Cohort 1, patients with positive stress fluoroscopy are allocated to Cohort 2. The study design is a non-inferiority study, proving to show that the outcomes of Cohort 2 are non-inferior compared to Cohort 1. Patients with positive weightbearing radiographs (interval between medial cuneiform and base of second metatarsal increased by \> 2 mm compared to the contralateral side) will be operated with minimally invasive stabilization (eg. isolated homerun screw) and followed up prospectively as a single cohort (Cohort 3).
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Acute Lisfranc injuries that are non-displaced (\< 2mm) on non-weightbearing radiographs and CT * Patients between 18 and 70 years of age * Acute presentation at one of our departments, enabling evaluating the stability of the injuries within 4 weeks
Exclusion criteria
* Fractures with an intraarticular step of \> 2mm on the initial non weight-bearing radiographs and/or CT * Delayed presentation (weight-bearing radiographs taken \> 4 weeks after injury) * Bilateral injuries * Concomitant major injuries of the foot, ankle or leg that affect the rehabilitation process * Multitraumized patients * Previous injury or surgery of the mid foot * Charcot foot * Noncompliant patients * Insufficient Norwegian or English language skills * Patients not available for follow-up * Inability to conduct the rehabilitation protocol
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ) | 5 years | Foot-Ankle specific PROM (0-100 with 0 representing the best possible outcome) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain | 5 years | Scores pain at rest and on activity (0-10 with 0 representing no pain) |
| Short-Form (SF) 36 | 5 years | Patient reported score measuring quality of life and health status |
| Self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS) | 5 years | Foot-Ankle specific PROM (0-48 with 48 representing the best possible outcome) |
| Posttraumatic osteoarthritis | 5 years | The presence of osteoarthritis of the tarsometatarsal joints is graded based on the Brodén radiographs taken at 1 year, 2 year and 5 year follow-up using the Kellgren & Lawrence classification system. |
| Incidence of complications | 5 years | Yes/no for deep or superficial infection, nerve or tendon injury, deep venous thrombosis, hardware complaints and secondary surgery. Regards the patients that have undergone surgical treatment. |
| American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Midfoot score | 5 years | Widely used foot/ankle score (0-100 with 100 representing the best possible outcome) |
Countries
Norway
Outcome results
None listed