Skip to content

Quad Helix and Correction of Mandibular Asymmetry

Is the Quad Helix More Efficient to Correct Mandibular Asymmetry Before Age 7? A Retrospective Comparative Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04429113
Enrollment
67
Registered
2020-06-12
Start date
2017-02-01
Completion date
2019-08-30
Last updated
2020-06-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Functional Shift of the Mandible, Mandibular Asymmetry

Keywords

Early treatment, Posterior unilateral cross bite, Quad helix

Brief summary

To compare the effectiveness of the Quad Helix, an orthopaedic conventional appliance, in the correction of skeletal mandibular asymmetry, on frontal x-ray, in subjects treated before or after 7 years.

Detailed description

Introduction : Unilateral posterior crossbite (UPCB), often from dysfunctional and para-functional causes, leads to positional mandibular asymmetries that can develop at a very young age into skeletal mandibular deviation; hence the interest of early maxillary expansion. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the impact of maxillary expansion by Quad Helix (QH) on mandibular skeletal asymmetry correction before and after 7 years of age. Materials and methods : All children with UPCB and skeletal mandibular asymmetry, who were treated by QH in the orthodontic department between February 2017 and August 2018 and who have done a radiography file at baseline (T0) and 12 months later (T1) have been included. The patients were divided into two groups according to age: under 7 years of age (early group G1) with QH adjusted on second primary molars and over up to 13 years old (late group G2) with QH adjusted on first permanent molars. The differences between the right and left sides of the mandible in corpus length L (main eligibility criterion) and ramus height H (secondary criterion) were compared between groups. X² test, Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for baseline comparisons. A multifactorial analysis allowing adjustment on possible confounding factors was used with R software at a significance level of 5%.

Interventions

DEVICEMaxillary expansion with conventional Quad Helix bonded on molars.

Maxillary expansion with conventional Quad Helix bonded on molars

Sponsors

University Hospital, Montpellier
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 13 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Unilateral Posterior Crossbite (at least one tooth) and skeletal mandibular asymmetry * Treated by Quad Helix in the Orthodontic Department of the CHU Montpellier * with frontal X-rays available at baseline and 12months later

Exclusion criteria

* Incomplete File * Inadequate quality of x-rays

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in the mandibular corpus length between the right and left side1 dayDifference in the mandibular corpus length between the right and left side : △L on conventional frontal x-ray.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in the mandibular ramus height between the right and left side of the mandibule1 dayDifference in the mandibular ramus height between the right and left side of the mandibule : △H on conventional frontal x-ray.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026