Skip to content

COVID-19 and the Healthy Minds Program for Educators

COVID-19 and the Healthy Minds Program for Educators

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04426318
Acronym
CAHMP-ED
Enrollment
698
Registered
2020-06-11
Start date
2020-06-14
Completion date
2021-01-12
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety, Depression, Psychological Distress, Psychological Stress, Well-being

Brief summary

This study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the four-week Healthy Minds Program (HMP) app Foundations training in employees of a mid-size urban school district in the United States during the summer of 2020, in the midst of the novel coronavirus pandemic. A 3-month follow-up in the fall of 2020 will also be conducted. Participants will be recruited via email and mailed postcards, and will first complete an online screen. Eligible participants will then enter a waiting zone for between 2-days and 2-weeks before they are sent the online pre-test. Upon completion of the pre-test, participants will be assigned to condition via a simple random number generator. If assigned to the intervention (i.e., the Healthy Minds Program App), participants will receive instructions and support in downloading and activating the app. Every 7-days over the 4-week intervention period participants in both conditions will complete the same set of measures. A full battery of measures will be administered a second time post-test, following the 4-week intervention period. Three-months after post-test, a follow-up assessment will be conducted. The investigators predict that participants assigned to the intervention will demonstrate significantly reduced psychological distress after the intervention, and these decreases will persist at the 3-month follow-up. Further, it is hypothesized that baseline participant characteristics and early experience of the intervention will predict treatment adherence, study drop-out and outcomes, and that treatment engagement will moderate outcomes.

Interventions

The HMP is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. The program is unique in several ways. First, all program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). Second, in addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.

Sponsors

Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
CollaboratorOTHER
Healthy Minds Innovations
CollaboratorOTHER
Center for Healthy Minds
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

There is no outcome assessor - all assessments will be conducted online by participants. Investigators will be blind to group assignment during data analysis. Analysis of hypotheses related to baseline characteristics, adherence and dosage cannot be blinded.

Intervention model description

Random parallel assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Ages 18 years old and up * Employees of a K-12 school district in Wisconsin * Smartphone or device that can download apps from Google Play or the iTunes app store

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals under 18 years old * Significant meditation experience: 1. Meditation retreat experience (meditation retreat or yoga/body practice retreat with significant meditation component), 2. Regular meditation practice weekly for over 1 year OR daily practice within the previous 6 months; or 3. Previous use of the HMP app. * Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression score \> 70

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress Scalebaseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)Psychological distress will be assessed by aggregating 3 measures: PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression, and the NIH Toolbox Perceived Stress Scale. Averages will be z-scored with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation 1. Higher scores indicate increased psychological distress.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness Subscalebaseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)A measure of acting with mindful awareness. The total possible range in scores is 8-40, with higher scores indicating greater levels of this facet of mindfulness.
Change From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)Psychological distancing (i.e., defusion) will be assessed with the 10-item Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS). The total possible range in scores is 0-50, with higher scores indicating greater levels of psychological distancing.
Change From Baseline on the Meaning in Life Questionnairebaseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)The Meaning in Life Questionnaire Presence subscale will be used to measure perceptions of meaning and purpose in life. The total possible range in scores is 5 - 35 with higher scores indicating greater levels of meaning.
Change From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness Scalebaseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)A measure of loneliness (i.e, lack of social connectedness). The total possible range in scores is 1-5, representing the average across all items; higher scores indicate greater levels of loneliness.
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresbaselineThe Conway COVID Questionnaire is a new, 16-tem measure of coronavirus related distress and related experiences. Subscales include: perceived threat, financial scale, resource scale, psychological scale, symptoms scale, proximity to others scale, and news scale. Ratings from 1 to 7 with 1 = not true of me at all and 7 = very true of me with higher scores representing greater perceived threat. Mean for each subscale reported.
Self-Compassion Scale Short Form Scorebaseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)The Self-Compassion Scale Short Form will be used to measure self-compassion. The total possible range in scores is 12-60, with higher scores indicating greater levels of self-compassion.
Change From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Race Biasbaseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)The Neutral Face Rating task is a novel measure of prosocial construal (average likability ratings) and race bias (average liking of white faces minus the average liking of black faces). Total score for race bias range from -6 to 6, with higher scores representing greater bias favoring white faces (negative scores on the bias measure indicate bias for liking black faces more than white faces).
Change From Baseline on the Growth Mindset Scale for Well-Beingbaseline, 4 weeks (post intervention)A measure of fixed versus incremental mindset regarding well-being. The average across items for a possible range in scores from 1-6 will be measured, with higher scores indicating greater levels of incremental views on well-being (i.e., it can be learned).
Change From Baseline on the Perseverative Thought Questionnairebaseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)Negative ruminative thinking will be measured with the Perseverative Thought Questionnaire. The total possible range in scores is 0-60, with higher scores indicating greater levels negative ruminative thinking.
Change From Baseline on the World Health Organization 5-item (WHO-5) Well-being Scalebaseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)Well-being will be measured using the WHO-5. The total possible range in scores is 0-25, with higher scores indicating greater levels of well-being.
Change From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Prosocial Construalbaseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)The Neutral Face Rating task is a novel measure of prosocial construal (average likability ratings) and race bias (average liking of white faces minus the average liking of black faces). Total score for prosocial construal is from 1 to 7, with higher scores representing greater prosocial construal.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Slope Across Time on Practice Quality and Mood ItemsEvery other day when participant completes a practice (up to 4 weeks)4-tems following each app-based practice for treatment participants that ask about perceive quality of the practice, (1 poor, 9 very good), and mood (1 poor, 5 good).
Digital Working AllianceAfter weeks 1, 2, and 3 during the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention) - Intervention group onlyA measure of working alliance in a digital environment that will be averaged across all items for a score range from 1 to 7, with higher scores reflecting higher levels of alliance.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

8321 Wisconsin school system employees invited, 1136 self-screened for eligibility, 353 ineligible (for prior medication, prior HMP app use, or depression t-score greater than 70), 698 consented, 32 did not complete a pre-test, 666 assigned to an arm.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training
Healthy Minds Program (HMP) is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. All program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). In addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.
344
Wait-list Control
Participants assigned to the wait-list control will not receive treatment for the intervention and follow-up period. They will be provided access to the HMP Foundations training after completing follow-up testing.
318
Total662

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studyfailed attention checks and had their data removed from analyses22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHealthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingTotalWait-list Control
Age, Customized
20-30 years
55 Participants101 Participants46 Participants
Age, Customized
30-40 years
105 Participants195 Participants90 Participants
Age, Customized
40-50 years
103 Participants196 Participants93 Participants
Age, Customized
50-60 years
61 Participants140 Participants79 Participants
Age, Customized
over 60 years
20 Participants29 Participants9 Participants
Age, Customized
under 20 years
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Employment Category
Classroom Support
47 Participants91 Participants44 Participants
Employment Category
Classroom Teacher
144 Participants278 Participants134 Participants
Employment Category
Other / Unknown
58 Participants101 Participants43 Participants
Employment Category
School Administrator
8 Participants12 Participants4 Participants
Employment Category
School Support
38 Participants73 Participants35 Participants
Employment Category
Special Education Teacher
29 Participants60 Participants31 Participants
Employment Category
System Staff
20 Participants47 Participants27 Participants
Highest Level of Education
Advanced Degree
208 Participants386 Participants178 Participants
Highest Level of Education
Graduated College
100 Participants203 Participants103 Participants
Highest Level of Education
Graduated High School
10 Participants16 Participants6 Participants
Highest Level of Education
less than 7 years formal education
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Highest Level of Education
NA
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Highest Level of Education
Some College
24 Participants51 Participants27 Participants
Household Income
$100,000 - $200,000
135 Participants256 Participants121 Participants
Household Income
$20,000 - $40,000
22 Participants41 Participants19 Participants
Household Income
$40,000 - $70,000
80 Participants162 Participants82 Participants
Household Income
$70,000 - $100,000
87 Participants161 Participants74 Participants
Household Income
greater than $200,000
9 Participants21 Participants12 Participants
Household Income
Less than $20,000
8 Participants17 Participants9 Participants
Household Income
Unknown
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian / Alaskan Native
5 Participants9 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian / Pacific Islander
9 Participants13 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black / African American
11 Participants26 Participants15 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic / Latino
15 Participants32 Participants17 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White / Caucasian
315 Participants602 Participants287 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
344 participants662 participants318 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
302 Participants583 Participants281 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
42 Participants79 Participants37 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Non-Binary
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3440 / 318
other
Total, other adverse events
344 / 344318 / 318
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3440 / 318

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress Scale

Psychological distress will be assessed by aggregating 3 measures: PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression, and the NIH Toolbox Perceived Stress Scale. Averages will be z-scored with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation 1. Higher scores indicate increased psychological distress.

Time frame: baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)

Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress ScaleBaseline0.00 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.88
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress ScaleWeek 1-0.29 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.89
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress ScaleWeek 2-0.40 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.85
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress ScaleWeek 3-0.55 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.88
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress ScaleWeek 4-0.67 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.89
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress ScaleWeek 16-0.55 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.87
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress ScaleWeek 4-0.20 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.03
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress ScaleBaseline0.00 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.91
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress ScaleWeek 3-0.14 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.02
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress ScaleWeek 1-0.10 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.95
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress ScaleWeek 16-0.24 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress ScaleWeek 2-0.10 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.01
Secondary

Change From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)

Psychological distancing (i.e., defusion) will be assessed with the 10-item Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS). The total possible range in scores is 0-50, with higher scores indicating greater levels of psychological distancing.

Time frame: baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)

Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)baseline24.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.89
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)Week 127.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.72
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)Week 228.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.42
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)Week 329.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.73
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)Week 431.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.54
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)Week 1630.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.69
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)Week 427.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.63
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)baseline24.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.23
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)Week 327.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.07
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)Week 126.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.31
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)Week 1628.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.57
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)Week 226.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.73
Secondary

Change From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness Subscale

A measure of acting with mindful awareness. The total possible range in scores is 8-40, with higher scores indicating greater levels of this facet of mindfulness.

Time frame: baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)

Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness Subscalebaseline24.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.93
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness SubscaleWeek 124.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.62
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness SubscaleWeek 225.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.47
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness SubscaleWeek 326.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.61
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness SubscaleWeek 427.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.67
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness SubscaleWeek 1627.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.32
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness SubscaleWeek 426.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.76
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness Subscalebaseline24.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.12
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness SubscaleWeek 326.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.21
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness SubscaleWeek 125.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.15
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness SubscaleWeek 1626.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.36
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness SubscaleWeek 225.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.44
Secondary

Change From Baseline on the Growth Mindset Scale for Well-Being

A measure of fixed versus incremental mindset regarding well-being. The average across items for a possible range in scores from 1-6 will be measured, with higher scores indicating greater levels of incremental views on well-being (i.e., it can be learned).

Time frame: baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention)

Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Growth Mindset Scale for Well-Beingbaseline5.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Growth Mindset Scale for Well-Being4 weeks5.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Growth Mindset Scale for Well-Beingbaseline4.94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Growth Mindset Scale for Well-Being4 weeks4.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Secondary

Change From Baseline on the Meaning in Life Questionnaire

The Meaning in Life Questionnaire Presence subscale will be used to measure perceptions of meaning and purpose in life. The total possible range in scores is 5 - 35 with higher scores indicating greater levels of meaning.

Time frame: baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)

Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Meaning in Life Questionnairebaseline26.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.44
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Meaning in Life QuestionnaireWeek 126.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.13
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Meaning in Life QuestionnaireWeek 227.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.14
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Meaning in Life QuestionnaireWeek 327.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.92
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Meaning in Life QuestionnaireWeek 427.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.35
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Meaning in Life QuestionnaireWeek 1627.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.14
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Meaning in Life QuestionnaireWeek 426.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.07
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Meaning in Life Questionnairebaseline25.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.46
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Meaning in Life QuestionnaireWeek 326.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.83
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Meaning in Life QuestionnaireWeek 126.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.38
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Meaning in Life QuestionnaireWeek 1626.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.87
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Meaning in Life QuestionnaireWeek 225.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.68
Secondary

Change From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Prosocial Construal

The Neutral Face Rating task is a novel measure of prosocial construal (average likability ratings) and race bias (average liking of white faces minus the average liking of black faces). Total score for prosocial construal is from 1 to 7, with higher scores representing greater prosocial construal.

Time frame: baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)

Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Prosocial Construalbaseline4.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Prosocial Construal4 weeks4.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.65
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Prosocial Construal16 weeks4.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Prosocial Construalbaseline4.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Prosocial Construal4 weeks4.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Prosocial Construal16 weeks4.37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Race Bias

The Neutral Face Rating task is a novel measure of prosocial construal (average likability ratings) and race bias (average liking of white faces minus the average liking of black faces). Total score for race bias range from -6 to 6, with higher scores representing greater bias favoring white faces (negative scores on the bias measure indicate bias for liking black faces more than white faces).

Time frame: baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)

Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Race Biasbaseline-0.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Race Bias4 weeks-0.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Race Bias16 weeks-0.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Race Biasbaseline-0.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Race Bias4 weeks-0.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Race Bias16 weeks-0.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
Secondary

Change From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness Scale

A measure of loneliness (i.e, lack of social connectedness). The total possible range in scores is 1-5, representing the average across all items; higher scores indicate greater levels of loneliness.

Time frame: baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)

Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness ScaleWeek 12.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness Scalebaseline2.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness ScaleWeek 42.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness ScaleWeek 22.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness ScaleWeek 162.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness ScaleWeek 32.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness ScaleWeek 162.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness Scalebaseline2.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness ScaleWeek 12.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness ScaleWeek 22.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness ScaleWeek 32.37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness ScaleWeek 42.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Secondary

Change From Baseline on the Perseverative Thought Questionnaire

Negative ruminative thinking will be measured with the Perseverative Thought Questionnaire. The total possible range in scores is 0-60, with higher scores indicating greater levels negative ruminative thinking.

Time frame: baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)

Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Perseverative Thought Questionnairebaseline29.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.43
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Perseverative Thought QuestionnaireWeek 424.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.71
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the Perseverative Thought QuestionnaireWeek 1623.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.74
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Perseverative Thought Questionnairebaseline29.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.29
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Perseverative Thought QuestionnaireWeek 428.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.37
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the Perseverative Thought QuestionnaireWeek 1625.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.19
Secondary

Change From Baseline on the World Health Organization 5-item (WHO-5) Well-being Scale

Well-being will be measured using the WHO-5. The total possible range in scores is 0-25, with higher scores indicating greater levels of well-being.

Time frame: baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)

Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the World Health Organization 5-item (WHO-5) Well-being Scalebaseline12.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.71
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the World Health Organization 5-item (WHO-5) Well-being ScaleWeek 415.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.33
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingChange From Baseline on the World Health Organization 5-item (WHO-5) Well-being ScaleWeek 1614.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.64
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the World Health Organization 5-item (WHO-5) Well-being Scalebaseline12.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.33
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the World Health Organization 5-item (WHO-5) Well-being ScaleWeek 412.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.84
Wait-list ControlChange From Baseline on the World Health Organization 5-item (WHO-5) Well-being ScaleWeek 1612.59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.74
Secondary

Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores

The Conway COVID Questionnaire is a new, 16-tem measure of coronavirus related distress and related experiences. Subscales include: perceived threat, financial scale, resource scale, psychological scale, symptoms scale, proximity to others scale, and news scale. Ratings from 1 to 7 with 1 = not true of me at all and 7 = very true of me with higher scores representing greater perceived threat. Mean for each subscale reported.

Time frame: 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)

Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresProximity Subscale4.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.63
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresResource Subscale1.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresNews Subscale3.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.58
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresSymptoms Subscale1.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.38
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresPsychological Subscale3.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.46
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresThreat Subscale4.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.36
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresFinancial Subscale2.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.97
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresThreat Subscale4.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresFinancial Subscale3.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.07
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresNews Subscale3.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.49
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresProximity Subscale4.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresPsychological Subscale4.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.58
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresResource Subscale1.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.27
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresSymptoms Subscale2.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
Secondary

Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores

The Conway COVID Questionnaire is a new, 16-tem measure of coronavirus related distress and related experiences. Subscales include: perceived threat, financial scale, resource scale, psychological scale, symptoms scale, proximity to others scale, and news scale. Ratings from 1 to 7 with 1 = not true of me at all and 7 = very true of me with higher scores representing greater perceived threat. Mean for each subscale reported.

Time frame: 4 weeks (post intervention)

Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresProximity Subscale3.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.67
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresResource Subscale1.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresNews Subscale3.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresSymptoms Subscale1.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresPsychological Subscale3.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresThreat Subscale4.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.38
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresFinancial Subscale3.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresThreat Subscale4.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.39
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresFinancial Subscale2.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.02
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresNews Subscale3.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresProximity Subscale3.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresPsychological Subscale4.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.54
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresResource Subscale1.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresSymptoms Subscale1.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
Secondary

Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores

The Conway COVID Questionnaire is a new, 16-tem measure of coronavirus related distress and related experiences. Subscales include: perceived threat, financial scale, resource scale, psychological scale, symptoms scale, proximity to others scale, and news scale. Ratings from 1 to 7 with 1 = not true of me at all and 7 = very true of me with higher scores representing greater perceived threat. Mean for each subscale reported.

Time frame: baseline

Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresProximity Subscale3.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresResource Subscale2.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresNews Subscale4.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.65
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresSymptoms Subscale1.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresPsychological Subscale4.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.45
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresThreat Subscale5.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.35
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresFinancial Subscale3.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresThreat Subscale5.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresFinancial Subscale3.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.02
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresNews Subscale4.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresProximity Subscale2.99 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresPsychological Subscale4.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresResource Subscale2.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
Wait-list ControlConway COVID Questionnaire Subscale ScoresSymptoms Subscale1.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
Secondary

Self-Compassion Scale Short Form Score

The Self-Compassion Scale Short Form will be used to measure self-compassion. The total possible range in scores is 12-60, with higher scores indicating greater levels of self-compassion.

Time frame: baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)

Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingSelf-Compassion Scale Short Form Scorebaseline35.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.25
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingSelf-Compassion Scale Short Form ScoreWeek 440.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.75
Healthy Minds Program Foundations TrainingSelf-Compassion Scale Short Form ScoreWeek 1640.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.62
Wait-list ControlSelf-Compassion Scale Short Form Scorebaseline35.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.42
Wait-list ControlSelf-Compassion Scale Short Form ScoreWeek 436.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.36
Wait-list ControlSelf-Compassion Scale Short Form ScoreWeek 1638.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.28
Other Pre-specified

Digital Working Alliance

A measure of working alliance in a digital environment that will be averaged across all items for a score range from 1 to 7, with higher scores reflecting higher levels of alliance.

Time frame: After weeks 1, 2, and 3 during the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention) - Intervention group only

Other Pre-specified

Slope Across Time on Practice Quality and Mood Items

4-tems following each app-based practice for treatment participants that ask about perceive quality of the practice, (1 poor, 9 very good), and mood (1 poor, 5 good).

Time frame: Every other day when participant completes a practice (up to 4 weeks)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026