Skip to content

Rectal Indomethacin Versus Rectal Indomethacin and Sublingual Nitrate for PEP Prevention

Rectal Indomethacin Versus Rectal Indomethacin and Sublingual Nitrate to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: a Multicentre, Non-inferiority, Double-blind, Randomised Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04425993
Enrollment
2700
Registered
2020-06-11
Start date
2020-07-01
Completion date
2022-12-30
Last updated
2020-10-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis

Keywords

ERCP, Post-ERCP pancreatitis, PEP, NSAIDs, indomethacin, nitrate

Brief summary

Patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are at risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), which is associated with adverse outcomes. Combination prophylaxis strategies are increasingly investigated to prevent PEP more effectively, and studies have confirmed the benefits. Two randomized controlled trials revealed that combination prophylaxis with rectal NSAIDs and sublingual nitrate has reduced PEP rates to 5.6%-6.7% in average-risk patients. However, there was concern regarding the safety of sublingual nitrate with reports of significant increasing the risk of hypotesion (rate of 54.9%) and headache (rate of 4.1%) as compared with placebo. As a safety drug, rectal administration of one dose NSAIDs is recommended as basic chemoprophylaxis in common or high-risk patients in guidelines. Results from previous studies showed rectal administration of NSAIDs significantly reduced PEP rate to 4-5.3% in average-risk patients. Although the difference in demographics, study design and outcomes definition, evidence was obtained that rectal NSAIDS was associated with similar PEP rate as combination prophylaxis with rectal NSAIDs and sublingual nitrate. However, evidence is lacking from large, randomized clinical trials indicating that efficiency of PEP prevention with rectal NSAIDs alone is not inferior to with combination prophylaxis. The investigators conduct this trial to investigate the hypothesis that rectal NSAIDs alone is non-inferior to the combination prophylaxis in terms of PEP prevention, but with reduce side effect.

Interventions

DRUGIsosorbide Dinitrate 5 MG

All patients without contraindications should receive sublingual isosorbide dinitrate tablet within 5 minutes before ERCP.

All patients without contraindications should receive rectal indomethacin within 30 min before ERCP.

All patients without contraindications should receive sublingual placebo within 5 minutes before ERCP.

DRUGRectal placebo

All patients without contraindications should receive rectal placebo within 30 min before ERCP.

Sponsors

Air Force Military Medical University, China
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients (age, 18-80 y) with native papilla planned for diagnostic or therapeutic ERCP were eligible for enrollment in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* contraindications to ERCP; * allergy to nitrates or NSAIDs; * currently on nitrate medication; * receiving NSAIDs within 7 days; * not suitable for indomethacin eg, gastrointestinal hemorrhage within the past 4 weeks, renal dysfunction (creatinine level \>1.4 mg/dL) or the presence of coagulopathy before the procedure (international normalized ratio \> 1.5); * acute pancreatitis within 3 days; * pregnant or breastfeeding women; * unwilling or inability to provide consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of post-ERCP Pancreatitis14 daysThe diagnosis of PEP was established if there was new onset of upper abdominal pain associated with an increased amylase or lipase level of at least 3 times the upper limit of normal range at 24 hours after the procedure, and hospitalization for at least 2 nights. Doctors are advised to use cross-sectional imaging to identify ambiguous PEP.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of moderate to severe PEP14 daysThe severity classification of pancreatitis was defined according to the criteria of Cotton et al and the revised Atlanta criteria.
Other adverse events14 daysAdverse effects of indomethacin, including gastrointestinal bleeding and renal failure. Adverse effects of nitrates, including hypotension, headache and dizziness. Other post-ERCP adverse events including cholangitis, bleeding, and perforation. Any other adverse outcomes possibly related to ERCP or experimental drugs that required hospital admission or a prolonged hospital stay for further management.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026