Skip to content

Study of Metronomic Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin Versus XELOX in Egyptian Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

Clinico-pharmacological Study of Metronomic Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin Versus Classic XELOX in Egyptian Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04425564
Enrollment
70
Registered
2020-06-11
Start date
2016-01-01
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2020-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Clinical Response, Survival, Toxicity

Keywords

colorectal cancer, metronomic capecitabine

Brief summary

Colorectal cancer (CRC) in Egypt is advanced tumors at diagnosis. Although, the dramatic increase in efficacy, reduction of mortality, and improvements in survival by the use of standard doses of chemotherapy, some CRC patients suffer from severe toxicities besides disease progression. Use of chemotherapy less than the maximum tolerated dose, with no prolonged drug free breaks incapacitates the cells to engage in progression mechanisms, suggesting that it could be a better alternative to standard dose therapy with better toxicity profile

Detailed description

This is a randomized phase II prospective study that included 70 (35 in each arm) metastatic Egyptian CRC cancer patients diagnosed at the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University between January 2016 and June 2018). Patients were randomly treated with either classic XELOX (arm A) or with capecitabine (2000 mg daily x 8 weeks) and oxaliplatin (30 mg/m2 weekly X 8 weeks) then 2 weeks rest (arm B). Toxicities and the survival analysis after two years for both regimens were recorded. Blood samples are taken from both groups to assess pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its relation to dosing.

Interventions

DRUGmetronomic XELOX
DRUGClassic XELOX
OTHERBlood samples for pharmacological studies

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute, Egypt
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patient age 18-70 years of both sexes. * PS 0-2 and histologically proven mCRC with unresectable metastases (rectal cancer is included to left side cancers). * They should have measurable lesions (that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension using calipers or ruler and measurement must be at least 20 mm using conventional techniques or 10 mm using spiral CT scan). * No previous treatment for metastatic disease and had ended adjuvant treatment \> 6 months. * peripheral neuritis less than grade 2. * Normal organ functions:(Creatinine ≤1.2, Bilirubin ≤1.2, SGOT/SGPT\< 2N, HB \>9gm/dl, WBC\>3.5/dl with ANC \>1.5/dl, Plat ≥100/dl). * For patients with liver metastases, Bilirubin should not be \>2.5N and transaminases not \>5N. (All patients were screened for HCV and HBS Ag by PCR). * Adequate cardiac functions (EF\>55%)

Exclusion criteria

* patients with only ascites or bone metastasis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
response ratestwo yearsCalculated with 95% confidence interval
Rate of toxicities and gradestwo yearsCategorical data summarized by pecentages
Peak and trough levels of capecitabine and relation to dosingTwo yearsNumerical data summarized by means and standard deviation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression free survivaltwo yearsCox proportional hazard model
Overall survivalTwo yearsKaplan and Meier test

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026