Skip to content

Evaluating Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors in a Short-term 2x2-Crossover Study

Evaluating Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors in a Short-term 2x2-Crossover Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04424888
Enrollment
6
Registered
2020-06-11
Start date
2018-03-15
Completion date
2018-06-29
Last updated
2022-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Type 2

Brief summary

This 5-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2x2 crossover pilot study investigate the potential of collecting robust, real-time clinical study measures of glucose levels using Abbott Freestyle Libre Continuous Glucose Monitoring devices associated with a smartphone application

Detailed description

The goal of this study is to characterize the performance of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in medical food studies. The Freestyle Libre Glucose Sensors will be used to follow subject's 8-day glucose trajectories over the course of a 5-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2x2 crossover, medical-food experiment. The medical food has been designed to increase butyrate production and promote the health of the colonic mucin layer.

Interventions

OTHERWB-011

WB-011 medical food product.

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo Capsules identical to those containing WB-011.

DEVICEContinuous Glucose Monitor

Abbott Freestyle Libre(™) Glucose Sensors were used throughout the study.

Sponsors

Pendulum Therapeutics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age: 18 to 75 years of age * If female, must meet all the following criteria: * Not pregnant or breastfeeding * If of childbearing potential (including peri-menopausal women who have had a menstrual period within one year) must practice and be willing to continue to practice appropriate birth control (defined as a method which results in a low failure rate, i.e., less than 1% per year, when used consistently and correctly, such as double barrier methods \[male condom with spermicide, with or without cervical cap or diaphragm\], implants, injectable or oral contraceptives \[must have been using for at least the last 3 months\], some intrauterine contraceptive devices, tubal ligation, or in an established relationship with a vasectomized partner) during the entire duration of the study * Must be able to read, understand, and sign the informed consent forms (ICF) and, when applicable, an authorization to use and disclose protected health information form (consistent with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 \[HIPAA\] legislation as modified in 2013) * Must be able to communicate with the investigator, and understand and comply with protocol requirements * Must be able to wear a CG patch and perform a scan no less than once every 8 hours for the duration of the sensor periods.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who plan to use antibiotic, antifungal, antiparasitic, or antiviral treatment during the study * Subjects using a proton pump inhibitor must be on a stable dose that will be maintained throughout the study period * Subjects who plan to travel outside the United States during the projected study period * Subjects who have received an experimental drug within 30 days prior to study entry * Subjects with known milk, peanut, or tree nut allergies * Subjects who have been diagnosed with a sexually transmitted disease including, but not limited to, HIV, syphilis, herpes, gonorrhea, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C * History of any surgery on the gastrointestinal tract except appendectomy and cholecystectomy * Subjects with any condition that the investigator deems as a sound reason for disqualification from enrollment into the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Temperature as a Source of Unwanted Variation When Using Freestyle Libre Glucose SensorsThrough study completion, an average of 5 weeksTemperature impacts the glucose level recorded by the Freestyle Libre glucose sensors. The thermostat of the Freestyle Libre glucose sensors can be assessed.
2-hour Interstitial Glucose Area Under the Curve (AUC)Change from baseline to 2 weeksChange in area under interstitial glucose concentration versus time curve (AUC) during standardized self-administered 2-hour Meal Tolerance Test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Expected Lifespan of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) SensorsThrough study completion, an average of 5 weeksTo measure the lifespan of CGM sensors, we recorded how many sensors were worn per participant during the study. Sensors were replaced either at the end of the recommended 10-day period, or when they were accidentally removed.
Number of Pictures Per Day2 weeks, (First intervention or second intervention)Average number of pictures per day using the smartphone application per period, used to measure study fatigue.
Change in Body MassChange from baseline to 2 weeksWeight measured via Scale
CGM-Smartphone Usability FeedbackThrough study completion, an average of 5 weeks.Questionnaire to assess usability of the CGM-sensor using the smartphone application. Question was: Would you recommend others to a study like this? On a scale of 1-10 with 1 being no and 10 being absolutely
Time Between CGM-sensor Scans2 weeks, (First intervention or second intervention)Average number of hours between CGM-sensor scans using the smartphone application during the study period. The subjects were instructed to scan at least every eight hours because the CGM-sensor does not save the data after eight hours without scanning.
Change in Fecal Quantitative PCR Measures of Probiotic Strain ConcentrationChange from baseline to 2 weeksFecal quantitative PCR of product strain will be measured throughout the study if subject provide stool samples. Mass Fraction is measured and the delta between the start and end of each period is computed.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment through local biotechnology community network over the time period of 3/15/18-3/16/18.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
WB-011 / Placebo
3 capsules administered twice daily with morning and evening meal. Continuous Glucose Monitor: Abbott Freestyle Libre(™) Glucose Sensors were used throughout the study. Each period lasted two weeks, separated by a washout period of no-less than 3 days. First period - WB-011: WB-011 medical food product. Second period - Placebo: Placebo Capsules identical to those containing WB-011.
3
Placebo / WB-011
3 capsules administered twice daily with morning and evening meal. Continuous Glucose Monitor: Abbott Freestyle Libre(™) Glucose Sensors were used throughout the study. Each period lasted two weeks, separated by a washout period of no-less than 3 days. First period - Placebo: Placebo Capsules identical to those containing WB-011. Second period - WB-011: WB-011 medical food product.
3
Total6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicWB-011 / PlaceboPlacebo / WB-011Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 participants3 participants6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 60 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

2-hour Interstitial Glucose Area Under the Curve (AUC)

Change in area under interstitial glucose concentration versus time curve (AUC) during standardized self-administered 2-hour Meal Tolerance Test.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 2 weeks

Population: Intent to treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
WB-0112-hour Interstitial Glucose Area Under the Curve (AUC)118.2167 min * mg/dLStandard Deviation 1334.929
Placebo2-hour Interstitial Glucose Area Under the Curve (AUC)613.3667 min * mg/dLStandard Deviation 604.2183
p-value: 0.21875Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Temperature as a Source of Unwanted Variation When Using Freestyle Libre Glucose Sensors

Temperature impacts the glucose level recorded by the Freestyle Libre glucose sensors. The thermostat of the Freestyle Libre glucose sensors can be assessed.

Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 weeks

Population: Technical problems with measurement of temperature data resulting in unreliable data that were uninterpretable. Therefore the endpoint was dropped.

Secondary

CGM-Smartphone Usability Feedback

Questionnaire to assess usability of the CGM-sensor using the smartphone application. Question was: Would you recommend others to a study like this? On a scale of 1-10 with 1 being no and 10 being absolutely

Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 weeks.

Population: Two participants did not complete the questionnaire.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
WB-011CGM-Smartphone Usability Feedback8.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.258306
Secondary

Change in Body Mass

Weight measured via Scale

Time frame: Change from baseline to 2 weeks

Population: Intent to treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
WB-011Change in Body Mass-0.2 kilogramsStandard Deviation 2.131666
PlaceboChange in Body Mass-1.72 kilogramsStandard Deviation 2.138224
p-value: 0.90625Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change in Fecal Quantitative PCR Measures of Probiotic Strain Concentration

Fecal quantitative PCR of product strain will be measured throughout the study if subject provide stool samples. Mass Fraction is measured and the delta between the start and end of each period is computed.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 2 weeks

Population: Intent to treat; one subject did not provide stool samples.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
WB-011Change in Fecal Quantitative PCR Measures of Probiotic Strain ConcentrationBifidobacterium infantis0.0000220 ng / ngStandard Deviation 0.0000259
WB-011Change in Fecal Quantitative PCR Measures of Probiotic Strain ConcentrationClostridium butyricum0.0000000313 ng / ngStandard Deviation 0.000001
WB-011Change in Fecal Quantitative PCR Measures of Probiotic Strain ConcentrationClostridium beijerinckii0 ng / ngStandard Deviation 0
WB-011Change in Fecal Quantitative PCR Measures of Probiotic Strain ConcentrationAnaerobutyricum hallii0.000371 ng / ngStandard Deviation 0.000585
WB-011Change in Fecal Quantitative PCR Measures of Probiotic Strain ConcentrationAkkermansia muciniphila0.0000143 ng / ngStandard Deviation 0.0000102
PlaceboChange in Fecal Quantitative PCR Measures of Probiotic Strain ConcentrationAnaerobutyricum hallii-0.000118 ng / ngStandard Deviation 0.00023
PlaceboChange in Fecal Quantitative PCR Measures of Probiotic Strain ConcentrationAkkermansia muciniphila-0.00000194 ng / ngStandard Deviation 0.00000367
PlaceboChange in Fecal Quantitative PCR Measures of Probiotic Strain ConcentrationBifidobacterium infantis-0.00000286 ng / ngStandard Deviation 0.00000639
PlaceboChange in Fecal Quantitative PCR Measures of Probiotic Strain ConcentrationClostridium beijerinckii0 ng / ngStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboChange in Fecal Quantitative PCR Measures of Probiotic Strain ConcentrationClostridium butyricum-0.00000131 ng / ngStandard Deviation 0.00000294
Comparison: Paired t-test for the species Akkermansia Munciphilae.p-value: 0.02t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Paired t-test for the species Bifidobacterium infantis.p-value: 0.078t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Paired t-test for the species Clostridium beijerinckii.
Comparison: Paired t-test for the species Clostridium butyricum.p-value: 0.2t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Paired t-test for the species Anaerobutyricum hallii.p-value: 0.12t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Expected Lifespan of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Sensors

To measure the lifespan of CGM sensors, we recorded how many sensors were worn per participant during the study. Sensors were replaced either at the end of the recommended 10-day period, or when they were accidentally removed.

Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 weeks

Population: Intent to treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
WB-011Expected Lifespan of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Sensors3 Number of sensorsStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Number of Pictures Per Day

Average number of pictures per day using the smartphone application per period, used to measure study fatigue.

Time frame: 2 weeks, (First intervention or second intervention)

Population: All participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
WB-011Number of Pictures Per Day5.85 Average number of photos per dayStandard Deviation 2.72
PlaceboNumber of Pictures Per Day5.46 Average number of photos per dayStandard Deviation 2.46
Comparison: We test whether the average number of daily photos is greater in period 1 than in period 2.p-value: 0.41t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Time Between CGM-sensor Scans

Average number of hours between CGM-sensor scans using the smartphone application during the study period. The subjects were instructed to scan at least every eight hours because the CGM-sensor does not save the data after eight hours without scanning.

Time frame: 2 weeks, (First intervention or second intervention)

Population: All participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
WB-011Time Between CGM-sensor Scans2.91 hoursStandard Deviation 1.99
PlaceboTime Between CGM-sensor Scans4.53 hoursStandard Deviation 2.17
Comparison: We test whether the average time between consecutive scans is smaller in period 1 than in period 2.p-value: 0.13t-test, 1 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026