Skip to content

ACT to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HCT) Patients

ACT to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HCT) Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04423939
Enrollment
33
Registered
2020-06-09
Start date
2020-10-14
Completion date
2025-02-01
Last updated
2025-11-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hematopoietic Steam Cell Transplantation (HCT)

Brief summary

This is a research study to develop and test a novel protocol to reduce physical and psychological vulnerabilities that contribute to treatment intolerance and treatment-related morbidity and mortality among hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) patients. When the participant enrolls in this study, they will be asked to participate in acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) as well as complete in-person physical function tests and a cognitive test. They will also receive training on how to use iOS devices (e.g. iPad, iPhone) and activity trackers (e.g. Apple Watch), which will be provided to them during the duration of study participation. The study team will ask you to complete multiple surveys about emotional and cognitive function, diet and social support, and ask the participant to provide feedback about the treatment (e.g., what they liked or did not like). The study team will also ask the participant to provide stool samples for analysis of the bacteria in intestines, skin surface swabs for analysis of the bacteria on skin and blood samples for analysis of biomarkers and metabolites. Biomarkers and metabolites are molecular and cellular parts that deal with genetic makeup, like DNA, RNA, protein, and/or other naturally occurring substances that may be associated with transplant outcomes. Participants can expect to be enrolled in this study for 3 years.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALAcceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)

The ACT sessions will be tailored to the clinical challenges of HCT. Sessions are with a mental health professional and are 45-60 minutes in duration and include both the participant and caregiver.

Sponsors

Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Patient: * Over the age of 18 * Undergoing allogeneic HCT for any cancer or noncancer illness * English speaking * Has a caregiver willing to participate Caregiver: * Over the age of 18 * English speaking

Exclusion criteria

* Under the age of 18 * Non-English speaking * Has a caregiver unwilling to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Physical Function, as Measured by 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline (~30 days before HCT), Signoff (~10 days before HCT), Day 90 post-HCTThe 6MWT is a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity.
Hospital Length of Stay, as Measured by Medical Record ReviewUp to Day 90Hospital length of stay in days

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Physical Function, as Measured by 6 Minute Walk TestBaseline, Day 30, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3The baseline for each patient is made through an algorithm that factors the patients age and gender. The patient's score is compared to what a person that is the patient's same age and gender would get. This comparison is then used as a tool to assess aerobic capacity or endurance.
Change in Symptom Severity, as Measured by PRO-CTCAE Core Symptom AssessmentDay 0, Year 1Assessing changes in severity of core symptoms that are typically associated with HCT
Clinical Outcomes, as Assessed by Adverse Events ReportingContinuous from baselinePost-HCT clinical outcomes (i.e. GVHD)
Acceptability of the Intervention, as Assessed by Exit InterviewsDay 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3Exit interviews to assess patients' opinion on the ACT program
Acceptability of the Intervention, as Assessed by the Acceptability SurveyBaseline, at each ACT session time point6-item survey to assess patients' opinion on the ACT program
Changes in Flow Cytometry, as Measured by Blood SamplesBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3Whole blood samples, will be analyzed and monitored for outcomes such as immune cell differentiation, immune response and development of GVHD. Flow cytometry will be performed.
Changes in Metabolomics, as Measured by Blood SamplesBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3Approximately 1ml of plasma from the EDTA tube will be used for metabolomics analysis.
Changes in Biomarkers, as Measured by Blood SamplesBaseline, Day 14, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3Assays evaluating angiogenic, stromal, and inflammatory markers and markers of aging (the Pepper Panel) are used to assess inflammation and frailty.
Change in Microbiome Diversity, as Measured by Skin SwabsBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3Skin swab samples batch sequenced and microbiome analyzed
Change in Overall Well-being, as Measured by PROMIS Sleep AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3The questions are asked as interval format with 0-Never through 5-Always. Each of the PRO instruments will be scored on the T-score metric, where 50 is the mean of a reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population.
Change in Overall Well-being, as Measured by PROMIS Global Health AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3The questions are asked as interval format with 0-Never through 5-Always. Each of the PRO instruments will be scored on the T-score metric, where 50 is the mean of a reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population.
Change in Caregiver Quality of Life, as Measured by Self-Efficacy and Preparedness for Caregivers AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 39-item questionnaire to assess preparedness for caregiving
Change in Quality of Life, as Measured by Lorig Self-Efficacy AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3The Self-Efficacy to Manage Chronic Disease Scale is made up of 6-items on a visual analog scale, ranging from 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident).
Change in Quality of Life, as Measured by EQ-5D-5L AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3The 5D represents 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Five levels of severity are measured, as indicated by the 5L, ranging from no problems to extreme problems. All scores are converted into a summary index.
Change in Caregiver Quality of Life, as Measured by FACT-GP AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 321 item assessment scored on a 5-point Likert scale
Change in Quality of Life, as Measured by FACT-BMT AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 350 item assessment. Higher total and domain scores indicate greater quality of life.
Change in Overall Well-being, as Measured by OARS IADLs AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3OARS IADL is a 7 item assessment that asks what level of assistance is needed to do 7 different activities of daily living
Change in Overall Well-being, as Measured by Fried Frailty AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3The scores of all of the sections are added and if the patient has a score greater or equal to three this assessment deems that the patients is frail. If the patient has a score between 1-2 the patient is deemed pre-frail.
Change in Financial Status, as Measured by Financial AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 322-item questionnaire to assess how a patient's care as affected their finances
Change in Caregiver Socioeconomic Status, as Measured by SES AssessmentBaseline, D180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3Questionnaire to assess caregiver socioeconomic status
Change in Financial Status, as Measured by COST-FACIT AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3COST-FACIT is an 11-item questionnaire that assesses a patient's financial toxicity
Change in Social Well-being, as Measured by CMS Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3CMS SDOH is a 10 item survey that assesses 5 domains of social needs
Change in Nutrition, as Measured by ASA-24 AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3ASA-24 is a self-administered 24-hour diet recall
Change in Nutrition, as Measured by PG-SGA/Clinician SGA AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3Scores for each section can range from 0-4 depending on severity and nutritional impact. The sum of all scores provides the Total PG-SGA score, which can be used to indicate the need for intervention (Bauer et al., 2002)
Change in Nutrition, as Measured by Perioperative Nutrition Screen (PONS)Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3PONS analyzes BMI, weight loss, and food intake to screen for preoperative nutrition risk
Change in Nutrition, as Measured by Body Mass Index (BMI)Continuous from baselineBMI can be associated with a patient's nutritional health
Change in Nutrition, as Measured by Albumin ValuesBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3Albumin levels can be associated with a patient's nutritional health
Change in Mental Health, as Measured by Brief COPE AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3Scores are presented for three overarching coping styles as average scores (sum of item scores divided by number of items), indicating the degree to which the respondent has been engaging in that coping style.
Change in Mental Health, as Measured by HHI-12 AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3The HHI-12 is an adapted 12 question version of the Hearth Hope Scale that assesses a patient's sense of hope
Change in Mental Health, as Measured by PROMIS Social Isolation AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3The questions are asked as interval format with 0-Never through 5-Always. Each of the PRO instruments will be scored on the T-score metric, where 50 is the mean of a reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population.
Change in Mental Health, as Measured by PROMIS Emotional Support AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3The questions are asked as interval format with 0-Never through 5-Always. Each of the PRO instruments will be scored on the T-score metric, where 50 is the mean of a reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population.
Change in Mental Health, as Measured by PROMIS Anxiety AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3The questions are asked as interval format with 0-Never through 5-Always. Each of the PRO instruments will be scored on the T-score metric, where 50 is the mean of a reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population.
Change in Mental Health, as Measured by PROMIS Depression AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3The questions are asked as interval format with 0-Never through 5-Always. Each of the PRO instruments will be scored on the T-score metric, where 50 is the mean of a reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population.
Change in Mental Health, as Measured by PC-PTSD/PCL-5 AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3PC-PTSD is a 5 item screen to identify patients with probable PTSD. If the patient screens positive, they then take the PCL-5. The PCL-5 is a 20 item screen to assess symptoms of PTSD.
Target Engagement (Process of Change), as Assessed by Valuing Questionnaire (VQ)Baseline, Day 90The VQ is a 10-item self-report questionnaire that assesses how closely a person is living in align with their values over the last week. Progress (range = 0 to 30) is defined as enactment and perseverance in living consistently with one's values; higher scores represent a closer alignment between one's internal values and one's actions. Obstruction (range = 0 to 30) represents the extent to which various disruptions got in the way of valued living; higher scores represent more interference with living consistently with one's values. The baseline and day 90 VQ scores are reported.
Change in Depression Score, as Measured by PHQ-9 AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3The PHQ-9 consists of 9 items, each of which is scored 0 to 3, giving a 0 to 27 severity score
Change in Cognitive Function, as Measured by PROMIS Cognitive Function AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3The questions are asked as interval format with 0-Never through 5-Always. Each of the PRO instruments will be scored on the T-score metric, where 50 is the mean of a reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population.
Change in Cognitive Function, as Measured by Montreal Cognitive AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3This administered assessment is subdivided into visuospatial/executive (5pts), naming (3pts), memory (no points), attention(5pts), language(3pts), abstraction(2pts), delayed recall(5pts), and orientation(6pts). All the subdivided sections have as many questions as they have points. For analysis, the cut point is if the patient has less than 26 points.
Change in Physical Function, as Measured by PROMIS Physical Function AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3The questions are asked as interval format with 0-Never through 5-Always. Each of the PRO instruments will be scored on the T-score metric, where 50 is the mean of a reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population.
Change in Shannon Diversity, as Measured by Stool SamplesBaseline, Day 90Stool samples assessed by 16s rRNA sequencing
Number of Falls, as Assessed by Falls QuestionnaireBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3Participants will answer Yes/No to whether they have had any falls in the preceding 6 months
Change in Step Count, as Measured by Activity TrackerContinuous from baseline up to 3 yearsActivity tracker tracks number of steps per day
Change in Physical Function, as Measured by 30 Second Sit-standBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3Subjects will sit in a chair with their arms crossed over their chest and rise to a standing position, then return to seated position. They will repeat this as many times as they can in 30 seconds.
Change in Physical Function, as Measured by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3All the task points are added which make the SPPB score. The cut-point for the SPPB is a score of 10. The cumulative and sections scores are assessed individually and comprehensively. This assessment score will be used as a tool for evaluating lower extremity functioning in older persons.
Change in Physical Function, as Measured by PROMIS Fatigue AssessmentBaseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3The questions are asked as interval format with 0-Never through 5-Always. Each of the PRO instruments will be scored on the T-score metric, where 50 is the mean of a reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population.
Hospital Length of Stay, as Measured by Medical Record ReviewUp to 3 yearsHospital length of stay in days

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from the Duke Adult Bone Marrow Transplant program between August 2020 and September 2022. The first subject was consented on October 14, 2020 and the last subject was consented on June 7, 2022.

Pre-assignment details

Five subjects consented to the study but were excluded before starting intervention. One patient's caregiver declined to participate and lack of caregiver participation is an exclusion criteria for this study. One patient was no longer scheduled to receive an allogeneic transplant and they and their caregiver were excluded. One patient relapsed and was no longer getting a transplant and they and their caregiver were excluded.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HCT) Patients
14 HCT patients at Duke Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT): The ACT sessions will be tailored to the clinical challenges of HCT. Sessions are with a mental health professional and are 45-60 minutes in duration and include both the patient and caregiver.
14
Caregivers
14 HCT patients' caregivers at Duke Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT): The ACT sessions will be tailored to the clinical challenges of HCT. Sessions are with a mental health professional and are 45-60 minutes in duration and include both the patient and caregiver.
14
Total28

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyCaregiver to patient who died03
Overall StudyCaregiver to patient who withdrew03
Overall StudyDeath30
Overall StudyStill on study (but completed primary endpoint)88
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCaregiversTotalHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HCT) Patients
Age, Continuous58.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
55.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
53.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
Diagnosis
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
1 Participants1 Participants
Diagnosis
Acute myeloid leukemia
6 Participants6 Participants
Diagnosis
Chronic myeloid leukemia
1 Participants1 Participants
Diagnosis
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma
1 Participants1 Participants
Diagnosis
Myelodysplastic syndrome
2 Participants2 Participants
Diagnosis
Myeloproliferative neoplasm
3 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants24 Participants13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants21 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants15 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants13 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 140 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 140 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 140 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Physical Function, as Measured by 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

The 6MWT is a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity.

Time frame: Baseline (~30 days before HCT), Signoff (~10 days before HCT), Day 90 post-HCT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HCT) PatientsChange in Physical Function, as Measured by 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Day 90478 meters
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HCT) PatientsChange in Physical Function, as Measured by 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline (~30 days before HCT)449 meters
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HCT) PatientsChange in Physical Function, as Measured by 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Sign off (~10 days before HCT)468 meters
Primary

Hospital Length of Stay, as Measured by Medical Record Review

Hospital length of stay in days

Time frame: Up to Day 90

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HCT) PatientsHospital Length of Stay, as Measured by Medical Record Review31.4 daysStandard Deviation 27.6
Other Pre-specified

Acceptability of the Intervention, as Assessed by Exit Interviews

Exit interviews to assess patients' opinion on the ACT program

Time frame: Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Acceptability of the Intervention, as Assessed by the Acceptability Survey

6-item survey to assess patients' opinion on the ACT program

Time frame: Baseline, at each ACT session time point

Other Pre-specified

Change in Caregiver Quality of Life, as Measured by FACT-GP Assessment

21 item assessment scored on a 5-point Likert scale

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Caregiver Quality of Life, as Measured by Self-Efficacy and Preparedness for Caregivers Assessment

9-item questionnaire to assess preparedness for caregiving

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Caregiver Socioeconomic Status, as Measured by SES Assessment

Questionnaire to assess caregiver socioeconomic status

Time frame: Baseline, D180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Cognitive Function, as Measured by Montreal Cognitive Assessment

This administered assessment is subdivided into visuospatial/executive (5pts), naming (3pts), memory (no points), attention(5pts), language(3pts), abstraction(2pts), delayed recall(5pts), and orientation(6pts). All the subdivided sections have as many questions as they have points. For analysis, the cut point is if the patient has less than 26 points.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Cognitive Function, as Measured by PROMIS Cognitive Function Assessment

The questions are asked as interval format with 0-Never through 5-Always. Each of the PRO instruments will be scored on the T-score metric, where 50 is the mean of a reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Depression Score, as Measured by PHQ-9 Assessment

The PHQ-9 consists of 9 items, each of which is scored 0 to 3, giving a 0 to 27 severity score

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Financial Status, as Measured by COST-FACIT Assessment

COST-FACIT is an 11-item questionnaire that assesses a patient's financial toxicity

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Financial Status, as Measured by Financial Assessment

22-item questionnaire to assess how a patient's care as affected their finances

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Mental Health, as Measured by Brief COPE Assessment

Scores are presented for three overarching coping styles as average scores (sum of item scores divided by number of items), indicating the degree to which the respondent has been engaging in that coping style.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Mental Health, as Measured by HHI-12 Assessment

The HHI-12 is an adapted 12 question version of the Hearth Hope Scale that assesses a patient's sense of hope

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Mental Health, as Measured by PC-PTSD/PCL-5 Assessment

PC-PTSD is a 5 item screen to identify patients with probable PTSD. If the patient screens positive, they then take the PCL-5. The PCL-5 is a 20 item screen to assess symptoms of PTSD.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Mental Health, as Measured by PROMIS Anxiety Assessment

The questions are asked as interval format with 0-Never through 5-Always. Each of the PRO instruments will be scored on the T-score metric, where 50 is the mean of a reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Mental Health, as Measured by PROMIS Depression Assessment

The questions are asked as interval format with 0-Never through 5-Always. Each of the PRO instruments will be scored on the T-score metric, where 50 is the mean of a reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Mental Health, as Measured by PROMIS Emotional Support Assessment

The questions are asked as interval format with 0-Never through 5-Always. Each of the PRO instruments will be scored on the T-score metric, where 50 is the mean of a reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Mental Health, as Measured by PROMIS Social Isolation Assessment

The questions are asked as interval format with 0-Never through 5-Always. Each of the PRO instruments will be scored on the T-score metric, where 50 is the mean of a reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Microbiome Diversity, as Measured by Skin Swabs

Skin swab samples batch sequenced and microbiome analyzed

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Nutrition, as Measured by Albumin Values

Albumin levels can be associated with a patient's nutritional health

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Nutrition, as Measured by ASA-24 Assessment

ASA-24 is a self-administered 24-hour diet recall

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Nutrition, as Measured by Body Mass Index (BMI)

BMI can be associated with a patient's nutritional health

Time frame: Continuous from baseline

Other Pre-specified

Change in Nutrition, as Measured by Perioperative Nutrition Screen (PONS)

PONS analyzes BMI, weight loss, and food intake to screen for preoperative nutrition risk

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Nutrition, as Measured by PG-SGA/Clinician SGA Assessment

Scores for each section can range from 0-4 depending on severity and nutritional impact. The sum of all scores provides the Total PG-SGA score, which can be used to indicate the need for intervention (Bauer et al., 2002)

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Overall Well-being, as Measured by Fried Frailty Assessment

The scores of all of the sections are added and if the patient has a score greater or equal to three this assessment deems that the patients is frail. If the patient has a score between 1-2 the patient is deemed pre-frail.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Overall Well-being, as Measured by OARS IADLs Assessment

OARS IADL is a 7 item assessment that asks what level of assistance is needed to do 7 different activities of daily living

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Overall Well-being, as Measured by PROMIS Global Health Assessment

The questions are asked as interval format with 0-Never through 5-Always. Each of the PRO instruments will be scored on the T-score metric, where 50 is the mean of a reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Overall Well-being, as Measured by PROMIS Sleep Assessment

The questions are asked as interval format with 0-Never through 5-Always. Each of the PRO instruments will be scored on the T-score metric, where 50 is the mean of a reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Physical Function, as Measured by 30 Second Sit-stand

Subjects will sit in a chair with their arms crossed over their chest and rise to a standing position, then return to seated position. They will repeat this as many times as they can in 30 seconds.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Physical Function, as Measured by 6 Minute Walk Test

The baseline for each patient is made through an algorithm that factors the patients age and gender. The patient's score is compared to what a person that is the patient's same age and gender would get. This comparison is then used as a tool to assess aerobic capacity or endurance.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Physical Function, as Measured by PROMIS Fatigue Assessment

The questions are asked as interval format with 0-Never through 5-Always. Each of the PRO instruments will be scored on the T-score metric, where 50 is the mean of a reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Physical Function, as Measured by PROMIS Physical Function Assessment

The questions are asked as interval format with 0-Never through 5-Always. Each of the PRO instruments will be scored on the T-score metric, where 50 is the mean of a reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Physical Function, as Measured by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)

All the task points are added which make the SPPB score. The cut-point for the SPPB is a score of 10. The cumulative and sections scores are assessed individually and comprehensively. This assessment score will be used as a tool for evaluating lower extremity functioning in older persons.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Quality of Life, as Measured by EQ-5D-5L Assessment

The 5D represents 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Five levels of severity are measured, as indicated by the 5L, ranging from no problems to extreme problems. All scores are converted into a summary index.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Quality of Life, as Measured by FACT-BMT Assessment

50 item assessment. Higher total and domain scores indicate greater quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Quality of Life, as Measured by Lorig Self-Efficacy Assessment

The Self-Efficacy to Manage Chronic Disease Scale is made up of 6-items on a visual analog scale, ranging from 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident).

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Shannon Diversity, as Measured by Stool Samples

Stool samples assessed by 16s rRNA sequencing

Time frame: Baseline, D0, D7, D14, D21, Day 30, Day 60, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Shannon Diversity, as Measured by Stool Samples

Stool samples assessed by 16s rRNA sequencing

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90

Other Pre-specified

Change in Social Well-being, as Measured by CMS Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) Assessment

CMS SDOH is a 10 item survey that assesses 5 domains of social needs

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Change in Step Count, as Measured by Activity Tracker

Activity tracker tracks number of steps per day

Time frame: Continuous from baseline up to 3 years

Other Pre-specified

Change in Symptom Severity, as Measured by PRO-CTCAE Core Symptom Assessment

Assessing changes in severity of core symptoms that are typically associated with HCT

Time frame: Day 0, Year 1

Other Pre-specified

Changes in Biomarkers, as Measured by Blood Samples

Assays evaluating angiogenic, stromal, and inflammatory markers and markers of aging (the Pepper Panel) are used to assess inflammation and frailty.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 14, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Changes in Flow Cytometry, as Measured by Blood Samples

Whole blood samples, will be analyzed and monitored for outcomes such as immune cell differentiation, immune response and development of GVHD. Flow cytometry will be performed.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Changes in Metabolomics, as Measured by Blood Samples

Approximately 1ml of plasma from the EDTA tube will be used for metabolomics analysis.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Clinical Outcomes, as Assessed by Adverse Events Reporting

Post-HCT clinical outcomes (i.e. GVHD)

Time frame: Continuous from baseline

Other Pre-specified

Hospital Length of Stay, as Measured by Medical Record Review

Hospital length of stay in days

Time frame: Up to 3 years

Other Pre-specified

Number of Falls, as Assessed by Falls Questionnaire

Participants will answer Yes/No to whether they have had any falls in the preceding 6 months

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

Other Pre-specified

Target Engagement (Process of Change), as Assessed by Valuing Questionnaire (VQ)

The VQ is a 10-item self-report questionnaire that assesses how closely a person is living in align with their values over the last week. Progress (range = 0 to 30) is defined as enactment and perseverance in living consistently with one's values; higher scores represent a closer alignment between one's internal values and one's actions. Obstruction (range = 0 to 30) represents the extent to which various disruptions got in the way of valued living; higher scores represent more interference with living consistently with one's values. The baseline and day 90 VQ scores are reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026