Cardiac Arrest, Resuscitation
Conditions
Keywords
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Chest compression, In-hospital, Mechanical, Manuel
Brief summary
In this study, the investigators compared mechanical and manual chest compressions in in-hospital cardiac arrest cases.
Detailed description
In this study, the investigators analyzed cardiopulmonary resuscitations performed over a 2-year period in an emergency department of a training and research hospital and compared success of manual and mechanical chest compressions in terms of return of spontaneous circulation, 30-day survival, and hospital discharge. Investigators present the study as an in-hospital cardiac arrest study; however, all of the resuscitation performed in the cases included in the study were performed in the emergency department.
Interventions
OTHERManuel chest compressions handled by clinicians
Compressions will be handled by human efforts
LUCAS-2 model piston-based mechanical chest compression device was used for mechanical chest compressions
Sponsors
Ankara Training and Research Hospital
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Over 18 age Cardiac arrest cases In-hospital cardiac arrest cases Resuscitations performed in emergency department
Exclusion criteria
\<18 age
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mortality rate on the 30th day | 30 days | Mortality rates from the hospital admission to the 30th day |
| Rate of the return of spontaneous circulation | 5 minutes | Rate of return of the spontaneous circulation with duration at least five minutes |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed