Skip to content

Targeted Melanoma Detection With Skin Self-Examination During COVID-19 Restricted Physician Access

Targeted Melanoma Detection With Skin Self-examination: Leveraging the Mammogram Encounter

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04420273
Acronym
TMD
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2020-06-09
Start date
2020-07-02
Completion date
2021-03-01
Last updated
2021-11-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melanoma

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to reduce melanoma mortality by improving early detection of melanoma with skin self-examination (SSE) among people who self-identify as being at risk and seek care for a concerning mole. Because women are more likely than men to perform SSE, women who are engaged in health promotion by having a recent screening mammogram are the focus of this research. Self-management of melanoma detection with SSE depends on ready access to dermatologists when a concerning mole is detected. In March 2020, the Illinois stay at home order (COVID-19) prohibited non-essential health care, including screening mammography and dermatology office-based care, and both are expected to remain limited until fall 2020. This submission explores a) the effectiveness of targeted melanoma detection (TMD) among women, who identify their risk of having a melanoma, learn to perform SSE, and perform SSE, and b) the effectiveness of adhesive patch-based home sample collection for genomic analysis to rule out melanoma in moles identified by women (who received the intervention) as concerning will be explored.

Detailed description

The proposed work will assess the effectiveness of targeted melanoma detection (TMD) with SSE education delivered remotely to women who had a screening mammogram. The effect of TMD with SSE education will be assessed with a randomized control trial among women served by Northwestern Medicine in rural, suburban and metropolitan communities. Women who identify concerning moles will choose among three options: a) watch the mole to see if the border, color or diameter of the mole changes b) send a picture of the mole to the PI for consideration of mole self-sampling, or c) make an appointment with my healthcare provider to check the mole. As required a physician will supervise women, who will perform non-invasive mole self-sampling with non-invasive adhesive patches for genomic analysis of the concerning pigmented lesion (mole). If the genomic analysis suggests that the concerning mole may be a melanoma, then the recommendation will be to have the mole biopsied.The effectiveness of acquired samples suggestive of melanoma will be examined by the obtaining the pathology reports of biopsied moles. Health care providers' (HCPs) clinical/pathologic assessment of concerning moles will be identified in the Northwestern Medicine electronic health record (EHR) system.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSSE educational intervention

Women participants receive a SSE brochure and three monthly reminders to perform SSE. In the second month, women select goals for SSE.

BEHAVIORALActive control:Healthy Living

Women participants receive a Healthy Living brochure and three monthly reminders to perform the following activities of healthy living: get quality sleep, walk briskly for 30 min, eat 5 servings of fruits and vegetables a day. In the second month, women select goals for healthy living.

Sponsors

Northwestern University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomized Control Clinical Trial Arm 1: SSE educational intervention with optional physician supervised non-invasive adhesive patch-based home sample collection of a concerning mole for genomic analysis Arm 2: Active control

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult women (aged 18 and older) with no upper age limit, who had a screening mammogram from January 1, 2019 to February 28, 2020. * Able to read English * Vision enough to read a newspaper * Self-perception of their potential melanoma risk * Willing to perform SSE either alone or with a skin check partner * Willing to complete monthly surveys for 3 months and receive monthly text messages to personal mobile phone * Have home Internet access and phone with ability to take a picture of a mole * Have access to Federal Express or US Postal Service Express Mail to send mole self-sampling kits * Willing to allow the research team access to their electronic health record to abstract physician assessment of concerning moles, biopsy results and treatment * Willing to provide up-to-date email address, mailing address and telephone number Inclusion criteria of skin check partner, who may be a man or a woman, to have mole self-sampled * Male or female over the age of 18 years * Able to read English * Vision enough to read a newspaper

Exclusion criteria

* Male * Female under the age of 18 * Unable to read English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Completed SSE at Specified Time Points90 daysSelf-reported performance of SSE, a custom scale with the frequency and extent of SSE is completed in an online monthly survey
Number of Participants Who Identified Concerning Moles at Specified Time Points90 daysSelf-reported identification of concerning mole identified by user assigning scores to the border,color and diameter of the mole. A validated scoring system is used to categorize the border, color and diameter as 1 if normal, 2 if not sure, and 3 if abnormal.The sum of the scores indicates if the mole is concerning (sum of 3= benign, stop checking the mole; sum of 4- 7 monitor the mole for change in the next month; sum of 8-9 = concerning mole make an appointment to see a physician.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Diagnosis of Participants Having Any Physician Visits for Concerning Moles5 monthsElectronic medical record review of physician's clinical diagnosis of concerning mole during the 3 months of the study and for 2 subsequent months
Participants' Reported Skin Self-examination Anxiety90 daysSelf-reported responses to 6 items, each with a 5-point Likert scale (range 6-30) higher score= more anxiety, a worse outcome
Biopsy Performed5 monthsEMR review of physician performing a biopsy on a concerning mole identified by the participant, percentage of biopsies performed
Pathologic Diagnosis of Concerning Moles5 monthsElectronic medical record review of pathologic diagnosis of biopsied moles that participants identified as concerning
Participants' Confidence Performing Mole Checks90 daysSelf-reported responses to 7 items, each with a 5-point Likert scale (range 7-35) higher score = greater confidence (better outcome).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SSE Educational Intervention
Women participants receive a SSE brochure and three monthly reminders to perform SSE. In the second month, women select goals for SSE. SSE educational intervention: Women participants receive a SSE brochure and three monthly reminders to perform SSE. In the second month, women select goals for SSE.
494
Active Control: Healthy Living
Women participants receive a Healthy Living brochure and three monthly reminders to perform the following activities of healthy living: get quality sleep, walk briskly for 30 min, eat 5 servings of fruits and vegetables a day. In the second month, women select goals for healthy living. Active control:Healthy Living: Women participants receive a Healthy Living brochure and three monthly reminders to perform the following activities of healthy living: get quality sleep, walk briskly for 30 min, eat 5 servings of fruits and vegetables a day. In the second month, women select goals for healthy living.
495
Total989

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSSE Educational InterventionActive Control: Healthy LivingTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
494 Participants495 Participants989 Participants
Age, Continuous47.0 years47.0 years47.0 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
37 Participants36 Participants73 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
457 Participants459 Participants916 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants6 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
485 Participants480 Participants965 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
494 Participants495 Participants989 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
skin type
I (always sunburn, never tan)
29 Participants22 Participants51 Participants
skin type
III (sometimes sunburn, tan moderately)
216 Participants200 Participants416 Participants
skin type
II (usually sunburn, tan minimally)
213 Participants230 Participants443 Participants
skin type
IV(rarely sunburn, tan deeply)
36 Participants43 Participants79 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 4940 / 495
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 4940 / 495
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 4940 / 495

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Who Completed SSE at Specified Time Points

Self-reported performance of SSE, a custom scale with the frequency and extent of SSE is completed in an online monthly survey

Time frame: 90 days

Population: Home sample collection arm participants were randomized into arm 1 at baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SSE Educational InterventionNumber of Participants Who Completed SSE at Specified Time Pointsbaseline ever perform SSE217 Participants
SSE Educational InterventionNumber of Participants Who Completed SSE at Specified Time Points1-mo perform SSE475 Participants
SSE Educational InterventionNumber of Participants Who Completed SSE at Specified Time Points2-mo perform SSE355 Participants
SSE Educational InterventionNumber of Participants Who Completed SSE at Specified Time Points3-mo perform SSE348 Participants
Active Control: Healthy LivingNumber of Participants Who Completed SSE at Specified Time Points3-mo perform SSE211 Participants
Active Control: Healthy LivingNumber of Participants Who Completed SSE at Specified Time Pointsbaseline ever perform SSE242 Participants
Active Control: Healthy LivingNumber of Participants Who Completed SSE at Specified Time Points2-mo perform SSE228 Participants
Active Control: Healthy LivingNumber of Participants Who Completed SSE at Specified Time Points1-mo perform SSE238 Participants
Comparison: 1-month surveyp-value: <0.001McNemar
Comparison: 2- monthsp-value: <0.001McNemar
Comparison: 3-monthsp-value: <0.001McNemar
Primary

Number of Participants Who Identified Concerning Moles at Specified Time Points

Self-reported identification of concerning mole identified by user assigning scores to the border,color and diameter of the mole. A validated scoring system is used to categorize the border, color and diameter as 1 if normal, 2 if not sure, and 3 if abnormal.The sum of the scores indicates if the mole is concerning (sum of 3= benign, stop checking the mole; sum of 4- 7 monitor the mole for change in the next month; sum of 8-9 = concerning mole make an appointment to see a physician.

Time frame: 90 days

Population: While 494 participants were randomized to receive the intervention, only 278 participants found a concerning mole. Similarly 495 participants were randomized to the active control arm, but only 144 identified a concerning mole. Thus the number analyzed in each arm is limited to the number of participants identifying a concerning mole.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SSE Educational InterventionNumber of Participants Who Identified Concerning Moles at Specified Time PointsMade physician appointment39 Participants
SSE Educational InterventionNumber of Participants Who Identified Concerning Moles at Specified Time PointsFollowed mole for change239 Participants
SSE Educational InterventionNumber of Participants Who Identified Concerning Moles at Specified Time Pointsstopped SSE0 Participants
Active Control: Healthy LivingNumber of Participants Who Identified Concerning Moles at Specified Time PointsMade physician appointment107 Participants
Active Control: Healthy LivingNumber of Participants Who Identified Concerning Moles at Specified Time PointsFollowed mole for change7 Participants
Active Control: Healthy LivingNumber of Participants Who Identified Concerning Moles at Specified Time Pointsstopped SSE30 Participants
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

Biopsy Performed

EMR review of physician performing a biopsy on a concerning mole identified by the participant, percentage of biopsies performed

Time frame: 5 months

Population: percentage of participants having a biopsy of a concerning mole

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SSE Educational InterventionBiopsy Performed56.4 percentage of participants having a biop
Active Control: Healthy LivingBiopsy Performed13.1 percentage of participants having a biop
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

Clinical Diagnosis of Participants Having Any Physician Visits for Concerning Moles

Electronic medical record review of physician's clinical diagnosis of concerning mole during the 3 months of the study and for 2 subsequent months

Time frame: 5 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SSE Educational InterventionClinical Diagnosis of Participants Having Any Physician Visits for Concerning MolesClinical diagnosis benign14 participants
SSE Educational InterventionClinical Diagnosis of Participants Having Any Physician Visits for Concerning MolesClinical diagnosis atypical nevus15 participants
SSE Educational InterventionClinical Diagnosis of Participants Having Any Physician Visits for Concerning MolesClinical diagnosis melanoma10 participants
Active Control: Healthy LivingClinical Diagnosis of Participants Having Any Physician Visits for Concerning MolesClinical diagnosis benign93 participants
Active Control: Healthy LivingClinical Diagnosis of Participants Having Any Physician Visits for Concerning MolesClinical diagnosis atypical nevus9 participants
Active Control: Healthy LivingClinical Diagnosis of Participants Having Any Physician Visits for Concerning MolesClinical diagnosis melanoma5 participants
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

Participants' Confidence Performing Mole Checks

Self-reported responses to 7 items, each with a 5-point Likert scale (range 7-35) higher score = greater confidence (better outcome).

Time frame: 90 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SSE Educational InterventionParticipants' Confidence Performing Mole ChecksBaseline9.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.05
SSE Educational InterventionParticipants' Confidence Performing Mole ChecksFollow-up-3 month11.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.05
Active Control: Healthy LivingParticipants' Confidence Performing Mole ChecksBaseline9.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.05
Active Control: Healthy LivingParticipants' Confidence Performing Mole ChecksFollow-up-3 month10.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.05
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

Participants' Reported Skin Self-examination Anxiety

Self-reported responses to 6 items, each with a 5-point Likert scale (range 6-30) higher score= more anxiety, a worse outcome

Time frame: 90 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SSE Educational InterventionParticipants' Reported Skin Self-examination AnxietyBaseline6.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.05
SSE Educational InterventionParticipants' Reported Skin Self-examination AnxietyFollow-up month 36.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.05
Active Control: Healthy LivingParticipants' Reported Skin Self-examination AnxietyBaseline6.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.05
Active Control: Healthy LivingParticipants' Reported Skin Self-examination AnxietyFollow-up month 36.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.05
p-value: <0.1Chi-squared
Secondary

Pathologic Diagnosis of Concerning Moles

Electronic medical record review of pathologic diagnosis of biopsied moles that participants identified as concerning

Time frame: 5 months

Population: all participants in arm 3 had benign moles on the home sample collected

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SSE Educational InterventionPathologic Diagnosis of Concerning Molesmelanoma stage 1A4 participants
SSE Educational InterventionPathologic Diagnosis of Concerning Molesbenign nevus0 participants
SSE Educational InterventionPathologic Diagnosis of Concerning Molesmelanoma stage 05 participants
SSE Educational InterventionPathologic Diagnosis of Concerning Molesatypical nevus13 participants
SSE Educational InterventionPathologic Diagnosis of Concerning Molesmelanoma stage 1B0 participants
Active Control: Healthy LivingPathologic Diagnosis of Concerning Molesatypical nevus6 participants
Active Control: Healthy LivingPathologic Diagnosis of Concerning Molesmelanoma stage 1B1 participants
Active Control: Healthy LivingPathologic Diagnosis of Concerning Molesmelanoma stage 03 participants
Active Control: Healthy LivingPathologic Diagnosis of Concerning Molesbenign nevus1 participants
Active Control: Healthy LivingPathologic Diagnosis of Concerning Molesmelanoma stage 1A3 participants
p-value: 0.459Chi-squared
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026