Skip to content

Effects of Preferential Left Ventricular Pacing on Ventriculoarterial Coupling and Clinical Course of Heart Failure

CompaRative Study of the Effects of Left ventriculAr and Biventricular Pacing on inDices of cArdiac Function and Clinical Course of Heart Failure PatienTs: Rationale and Design of the READAPT Randomized Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04420065
Acronym
READAPT
Enrollment
220
Registered
2020-06-09
Start date
2020-09-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2020-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Keywords

Heart failure, Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Preferential left ventricular pacing, Ventriculoarterial coupling, Echocardiography, Cardiopulmonary exercise test

Brief summary

Randomized trial of adult patients to study the effects of preferential left ventricular pacing on ventriculoarterial coupling of both systemic and pulmonary circulation, indices of systolic and diastolic function of both ventricles, and clinical course of patients with advances dyssynchronous heart failure.

Detailed description

Study hypothesis is that preferential left ventricular (LV) pacing, delivered by means of the AdaptivCRT® algorithm and in conjunction with automated V-V delay adjustments, will lead to improvements over standard biventricular pacing (BVP) in the function of all cardiac chambers, reduce arrhythmic burden, improve ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC), and patient functional status. It would be interesting to study what changes in right-side VAC (RVAC) can be appreciated with the activation of the preferential LV pacing algorithm and how they relate to each other, i.e. whether LV is driven towards maximizing output whilst RV shifts to optimizing energy efficiency. READAPT is a single-center, prospective, randomized trial of heart failure patients eligible for CRT according to current European heart failure guidelines. Informed written consent is required from all study participants. Adult (aged 18-80 years old), consenting patients with any cardiomyopathy type, diagnosed at least 6 months prior (to exclude recent myocarditis cases that may remit and confound outcomes), on optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months, and an existing I/IIa indication for a cardiac resynchronization therapy - defibrillator (CRT-D) device will be enrolled and randomized into 2 groups, one receiving standard CRT (Group 1 - G1), and one with activation of the preferential LV pacing algorithm (Group 2 - G2). Enrollment date will amount to the baseline assessment date, with device implantation occurring preferably within 48 hours. READAPT will include patients with both new CRT-D implantation and an upgrade from an existing defibrillator or pacemaker with no prior left ventricular lead placement.

Interventions

DEVICEPreferential left ventricular pacing

Activation of an algorithm attempting to provide preferential left ventricular pacing in an anticipatory manner, thus potentially preventing iatrogenic, pacing-related, right ventricular dysfunction, and improving coupling and outcomes in dyssynchronous heart failure patients

Standard biventricular pacing, with V-V delay programmed based on stroke volume maximization, and A-V delay delegated to the device

Sponsors

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Patient and assessor unaware of chosen programming mode and activated algorithms. The standard of care that is biventricular pacing will be provided to all participants.

Intervention model description

Patients randomized after enrollment to receive either standard biventricular pacing, or preferential left ventricular pacing (left ventricle will be resynchronized, but right ventricle will be activated through the intrinsic conduction system)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age 18-80 years old Provided informed consent Any cardiomyopathy type, diagnosed at least 6 months prior (to exclude recent myocarditis cases that may remit and confound outcomes) On optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months, An existing I/IIa indication for a CRT-D device Both new CRT-D implantation and an upgrade from an existing ICD or pacemaker with no prior left ventricular lead placement.

Exclusion criteria

1. Have an existing Class I recalled lead, 2. Are anticipated to need heart transplantation within the next 9 months, 3. Have undergone cardiac transplantation less than 40 days prior to enrolment, 4. Have had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within 3 months of enrollment, 5. Have had a recent myocardial infarction less than 40 days prior to enrollment, or unstable angina or cardiac revascularization less than 3 months prior to enrolment, 6. Have documented moderate to severe/severe mitral/aortic/tricuspid/pulmonary insufficiency (noninvasive VAC calculation impossible), 7. Exhibit a daily burden of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) of either ≥10% of total QRSs or ≥10,000 on ambulatory ECG recording21, 22 (to exclude PVC-related, potentially reversible cardiomyopathy), 8. Are currently participating in a clinical investigation that includes an active treatment arm, 9. Have diagnosed pulmonary hypertension other than class II (left heart-related), 10. Have known stage IV-V renal dysfunction (clearance estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation), 11. Have permanent atrial fibrillation, 12. Have complete atrioventricular block, 13. Have a prolonged (\>200msec) PQ interval on surface ECG (thus invalidating the option for preferential LV pacing), 14. Are pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the duration of the study (in case of unplanned pregnancy the patient will have to be excluded from the study), 15. Have an expected life expectancy of \<12 months, or 16. Undergo major adaptations to their pharmacological regimens during follow-up (e.g. initiation of neprilysin inhibitors).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in patient exercise capacity12 monthsAssessed by cardiopulmonary exercise test in terms of maximal oxygen consumption in ml/kg/min

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of hospitalizations for heart failure12 monthsData retrieved from online patient file will be used to compare number of unplanned hospitalizations for worsening heart failure between groups
Left ventricular function12 monthsAssessed by ejection fraction (in %), strain echocardiography - changes in % global longitudinal peak strain and diastolic function indices (E/e')
Right ventricular function12 monthsAssessed by strain echocardiography in terms of two-dimensional % global longitudinal peak strain
Ventriculoarterial coupling for both systemic and pulmonary circulation12 monthsAssessed by the noninvasive single-beat echocardiographic method in terms of distance from 1 (value associated with maximization of stroke work for a given contractility)

Countries

Greece

Contacts

Primary ContactChristina Chrysohoou, MD PhD
chrysohoou@usa.net00306944435168
Backup ContactChristos-Konstantinos Antoniou, MD PhD
ckantoniou@hotmail.gr00306972708430

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026