Skip to content

Plastic Stent Within a Lumen-Apposing Stent for Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Is Useful a Coaxial Plastic Stent Within a Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent For The Palliative Management Of Malignant Biliary Obstruction?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04420039
Acronym
LAMSpigBil
Enrollment
39
Registered
2020-06-09
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2021-03-31
Last updated
2021-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endoscopy, Oncologic Disorders, Pancreatic Cancer, Therapy Related Neoplasms

Keywords

Malignant biliary obstrucction, Therapeutic endoscopy, Biliary drainage, Lumen apposing stent, Endoscopic Ultrasound, Pancreatic neoplasm

Brief summary

There are doubts concerning the possible benefits derived from the insertion of double-pigtail plastic stents (DPS) within the lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) in the EUS-guided transmural biliary drainage (BD). The aims was to evaluate the safety of LAMS with and without a coaxial DPS in EUS-BD for the palliative management in malignant biliary obstruction.

Interventions

DEVICEEndoscopic biliary transmural drainage

Endosonography-guided biliodigestive anastomosis using a dedicated biliary lumen-apposing stent in order to proveide a biliary drainage in cases of palliative malignant biliary obstruction. Two different strategies will be compared: single lumen-apposing stent vs lumen-apposing stent plus dousble-pigtail plastic stent.

Sponsors

Hospital Mutua de Terrassa
CollaboratorOTHER
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
CollaboratorOTHER
Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Consecutive unresectable/inoperable biliopancreatic cases with distal biliary obstruction who underwent EUS-BD after failed ERCP cannulation or inaccessible papilla

Exclusion criteria

* Borderline cancer cases * Others type of biliary stents * Severe coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Potential benefits4 weeksto respond if a coaxial DPS within a biliary LAMS really has a potential benefit in the EUS-BD (less number of adverse events: cholangitis, bleeding, sump syndrome, cholestasis secondary to stent biliary obstruction)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Biliary reintervention6 monthsBiliary reintervention: the need to perform additional interventions to achieve biliary drainage.
Technical success24 hoursTechnical success was defined as a successful stent placement between the extrahepatic bile duct and duodenal lumen in a single step approach and determined by endoscopy and fluoroscopy
Clinical success4 weeksClinical success was defined as a reduction in bilirubin by 50% at 2-weeks after stent placement, meaning that the biliary stent was functional.
Procedure time2 hoursProcedure time was defined from the insertion of the endoscope to its removal.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026