Skip to content

Pioglitazone and SGLT2 Inhibitors vs. DPP4 Inhibitors in Patients With Stroke

Comparison of Combined Pioglitazone and SGLT2 Inhibitors vs. DPP4 Inhibitors in Diabetic Patients With Ischemic Stroke: Rationale and Study Design

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04419337
Enrollment
200
Registered
2020-06-05
Start date
2019-09-15
Completion date
2024-01-31
Last updated
2023-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Stroke

Keywords

stroke, diabetes mellitus, sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitor, pioglitazone

Brief summary

Introduction: An optimal combination of antidiabetic drugs for diabetic patients with ischemic stroke is not well-established. The objective of this randomized trial is to evaluate whether combination of pioglitazone and a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor, compared with a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, reduces recurrent stroke in diabetic patients with recent ischemic stroke. Methods and analysis: The trial is a randomized, parallel-group study conducted at 7 hospitals in Taiwan. Inclusion criteria are adult patients with a history of ischemic stroke within 3 months, diabetes mellitus with Hba1C \> 7%, taking metformin currently or previously, and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Eligible patients who sign the informed consent forms will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either combination of pioglitazone and an SGLT2 inhibitor (empagliflozin or dapagliflozin or canagliflozin) vs. a DPP4 inhibitor. Primary outcome is change in HbA1C between 6 months and baseline in active vs comparator groups. Additional biomarker outcomes are change in hs-CRP insulin resistance, B type natriuretic peptide, and urine albumin creatinine ratio between 6 months and baseline. Ethics and dissemination Study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi Branch, Taiwan (201702353A3, 201802340A3 and 201902176A3). All participants will be required to sign and date an informed consent form. Study findings will be disseminated via a peer-reviewed journal.

Interventions

DRUGMetformin plus Pioglitazone plus an SGLT2 inhibitor

Patients assigned to active group will stop their prior oral antidiabetic drugs and receive combination of metformin, pioglitazone, and an SGLT2 inhibitor (empagliflozin or dapagliflozin or canagliflozin) and dose will be adjusted by their physicians.

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Chiayi Christian Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Tainan Sin-lau Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Ischemic stroke within 3 months of randomization 2. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and Hba1C \> 7.0% and under metformin therapy currently or previously 3. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 4. Age ≥ 20 y at study entry 5. Ability and willingness to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. History of congestive heart failure (NYHA class 1-4) 2. History of bladder cancer 3. History of repeated (\> 2 episodes) urinary tract infection or genital tract infection 4. Irreversible medical conditions with predicted survival \< 1 years 5. Current use of an insulin 6. Current use of a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist 7. Current use of pioglitazone or an SGLT-2 inhibitor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HbA1C6 months from baseline in active vs control armsblood test to evaluate glycemic control

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
UACR6 months from randomization in active vs control armsto evaluate microalbuminuria
hs-CRP6 months from randomizationto evaluate hs-CRP in active vs control arms
NT-proBNP6 months from randomizationto evaluate NT-proBNP in active vs control arms
insulin resistance6 months from randomizationInsulin resistance will be evaluated by Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactMeng Lee, MD
menlee5126@gmail.com8863621000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026