Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Eptinezumab for the Prevention of Migraine in Participants That Are Not Helped by Previous Preventive Treatments

Interventional, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study With an Extension Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Eptinezumab for the Prevention of Migraine in Patients With Unsuccessful Prior Preventive Treatments

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04418765
Acronym
DELIVER
Enrollment
892
Registered
2020-06-05
Start date
2020-06-01
Completion date
2022-09-15
Last updated
2023-09-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Migraine

Brief summary

Evaluation of eptinezumab in the prevention of migraine in participants with unsuccessful prior preventive treatments.

Detailed description

The total study duration from the screening visit to the completion visit is approximately 76 weeks and includes a screening period (28-30 days), a placebo-controlled treatment period (24 weeks) and a treatment extension period (48 weeks). The participant will start treatment at the baseline visit and follow a 12-week dosing schedule with either eptinezumab (100 or 300 milligrams \[mg\]) or placebo by intraveneous (IV) infusion. Participants who were assigned to placebo in the placebo-controlled treatment period, will be randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups: eptinezumab 300 mg or eptinezumab 100 mg.

Interventions

DRUGEptinezumab

Eptinezumab, concentrate for solution for infusion 100 mg/milliliter (mL)

DRUGPlacebo

concentrate for solution for infusion, intravenously

Sponsors

H. Lundbeck A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The participant has a diagnosis of migraine, with a history of chronic or episodic migraines of at least 12 months prior to the Screening Visit * The participant has a migraine onset of ≤50 years of age. * The participant has ≥4 migraine days per month for each month within the past 3 months prior to the Screening Visit. * The participant has demonstrated compliance with the Headache eDiary by entry of data for at least 24 of the 28 days following the Screening Visit. * The participant fulfils the following criteria for chronic migraine (CM) or episodic migraine (EM) in prospectively collected information in the eDiary during the screening period: * For participants with CM: Migraine occurring on ≥8 days and headache occurring on \>14 days * For participants with EM: Migraine occurring on ≥4 days and headache occurring on ≤14 days * The participant has documented evidence of treatment failure (must be supported by medical record or by physician's confirmation specific to each treatment) in the past 10 years of 2-4 different migraine preventive medications. * The participant has a history of either previous or active use of triptans for migraine.

Exclusion criteria

* The participant has experienced failure on a previous treatment targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway. * The participant has a treatment failure on valproate/divalproex or botulinum toxin A/B and the treatment is not the latest preventive medication prior to study inclusion. The medication is regarded as the latest if the medication start date is after the start date of the other preventive medications and the medication stop date is after the stop date of the other preventive medications. * The participant has confounding and clinically significant pain syndromes, (for example, fibromyalgia, chronic low back pain, complex regional pain syndrome). * The participant has a diagnosis of acute or active temporomandibular disorder. * The participant has a history or diagnosis of chronic tension-type headache, hypnic headache, cluster headache, hemicrania continua, new daily persistent headache, or unusual migraine subtypes such as hemiplegic migraine (sporadic and familial), ophthalmoplegic migraine, and migraine with neurological accompaniments that are not typical of migraine aura (diplopia, altered consciousness, or long duration). * The participant has a psychiatric condition that is uncontrolled and/or untreated for a minimum of 6 months prior to the Screening Visit. Participants with a lifetime history of psychosis and/or mania in the last 5 years prior to the Screening Visit are excluded. * The participant has a history of clinically significant cardiovascular disease or vascular ischaemia or thromboembolic events (for example, cerebrovascular accident, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism). Other in- and

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Number of Monthly Migraine Days (MMDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24Baseline, Weeks 13 - 24A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.
Percentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12Baseline to Weeks 1 - 12A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.
Change From Baseline in the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) Score at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The HIT-6 (version 1.0) is a Likert-type, self-reporting questionnaire designed to assess the impact of an occurring headache and its effect on the ability to function normally in daily life. The HIT-6 contains 6 questions, each item was rated from never to always with the following response scores: never = 6, rarely = 8, sometimes = 10, very often = 11, and always = 13. The total score for the HIT-6 was the sum of each response score ranging from 36 to 78. The life impact derived from the total score was described as followed: severe (≥60), substantial (56-59), some (50-55), little to none (≤49).
Percentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24Baseline to Weeks 13 - 24A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.
Percentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24Baseline to Weeks 13 - 24A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.
Percentage of Participants With 100% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12Baseline to Weeks 1 - 12A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.
Percentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days (MHDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12Baseline to Weeks 1 - 12A headache day was defined as a day with a headache that lasted ≥30 minutes or met the definition of a migraine day (as defined in criterion A, B, C, or D above in outcome measure 1).
Percentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days (MHDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12Baseline to Weeks 1 - 12A headache day was defined as a day with a headache that lasted ≥30 minutes or met the definition of a migraine day (as defined in criterion A, B, C, or D above in outcome measure 1).
Percentage of Participants With 100% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days (MHDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12Baseline to Weeks 1 - 12A headache day was defined as a day with a headache that lasted ≥30 minutes or met the definition of a migraine day (as defined in criterion A, B, C, or D above in outcome measure 1).
Change From Baseline in the Number of MHDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12A headache day was defined as a day with a headache that lasted ≥30 minutes or met the definition of a migraine day (as defined in criterion A, B, C, or D above in outcome measure 1).
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Migraine Attacks With Severe Pain Intensity Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12A migraine attack was defined as a headache that occurred on a single day or lasted \>1 day and that met the criteria for a migraine day (as defined in criterion A, B, C, or D above in outcome measure 1).
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Headache Episodes With Severe Pain Intensity Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12A headache episode was defined as a headache lasted ≥30 minutes or that met the criteria for a migraine (as defined in criterion A, B, C, or D above in outcome measure 1).
Change From Baseline in the Number of Monthly Days With Use of Acute Migraine Medication Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12In the evening eDiary, participants were asked each day to fill out whether they used any of the following medications during that day: Ergotamine, triptan, analgesic, opioid, or combination analgesic. A day where the participant answered that they took any of those in the evening eDiary was considered a day with use of acute migraine medication.
Change From Baseline in the Number of Monthly Days With Use of Acute Migraine Medication Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24Baseline, Weeks 13- 24In the evening eDiary, participants were asked each day to fill out whether they used any of the following medications during that day: Ergotamine, triptan, analgesic, opioid, or combination analgesic. A day where the participant answered that they took any of those in the evening eDiary was considered a day with use of acute migraine medication.
Change From Baseline in the Number of MMDs With Use of Acute Medication Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12Number of MMDs with acute medication usage was derived using the answer to Did you take any medications to treat this headache? in the headache diary. The question was asked when a participant was ending a headache. Thus, a migraine day with acute medication usage was defined as a migraine day with the extra condition that this question was answered as Yes.
Change From Baseline in the Number of MMDs With Use of Acute Medication Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24Baseline, Weeks 13 - 24Number of MMDs with acute medication usage was derived using the answer to Did you take any medications to treat this headache? in the headache diary. The question was asked when a participant was ending a headache. Thus, a migraine day with acute medication usage was defined as a migraine day with the extra condition that this question was answered as Yes.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Week 12Week 12The PGIC is a single, participant-reported item reflecting the participant's impression of change in his/her disease status since the start of the study (that is, in relation to activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall quality of life). Participants rated their impression of change in disease status on a 7-point scale (1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse) where a higher score indicated worsening. Score ranges from 1 (Very Much Improved) to 7 (Very Much Worse). Lower scores indicate better health status.
PGIC Score at Week 24Week 24The PGIC is a single, participant-reported item reflecting the participant's impression of change in his/her disease status since the start of the study (that is, in relation to activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall quality of life). Participants rated their impression of change in disease status on a 7-point scale (1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse) where a higher score indicated worsening. Score ranges from 1 (Very Much Improved) to 7 (Very Much Worse). Lower scores indicate better health status.
Change From Baseline in the Number of MMDs in Participants With Medication Overuse Headache (MOH) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12
Percentage of Participants With Migraine on the Day After First DosingDay 1
Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) Score at Week 12Week 12Participants were asked about their most bothersome symptom associated with their migraines during the Baseline Visit. Participants were asked to rate the improvement in this symptom from baseline on a 7-point scale (1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse) where a high score indicated worsening. Score ranges from 1 (Very Much Improved) to 7 (Very Much Worse). Lower scores indicate better health status. The MBS areas included: nausea, vomiting, sensitivity to light, sensitivity to sound, mental cloudiness, fatigue, pain with activity, mood changes, and other symptoms.
Change From Baseline in the HIT-6 Score at Week 24Baseline, Week 24The HIT-6 (version 1.0) is a Likert-type, self-reporting questionnaire designed to assess the impact of an occurring headache and its effect on the ability to function normally in daily life. The HIT-6 contains 6 questions, each item was rated from never to always with the following response scores: never = 6, rarely = 8, sometimes = 10, very often = 11, and always = 13. The total score for the HIT-6 was the sum of each response score ranging from 36 to 78. The life impact derived from the total score was described as followed: severe (≥60), substantial (56-59), some (50-55), little to none (≤49).
Change From Baseline in the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ) Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The MSQ is a participant-reported outcome designed to assess the quality of life in participants with migraine. It consists of 14 items covering 3 domains: role function restrictive (7 items); role function preventive (4 items); and emotional function (3 items). Each item was scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). Raw domain scores were summed and transformed to a 0- to 100-point scale. Higher scores indicated better quality of life.
Change From Baseline in the Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The EQ-5D-5L is a participant-reported assessment designed to measure the participant's well-being. It consists of 5 descriptive items (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and depression/anxiety) and a VAS of the overall health state. Each descriptive item was rated on a 5-point index ranging from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems). The VAS ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).
Change From Baseline in the MSQ Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 24Baseline, Week 24The MSQ is a participant-reported outcome designed to assess the quality of life in participants with migraine. It consists of 14 items covering 3 domains: role function restrictive (7 items); role function preventive (4 items); and emotional function (3 items). Each item was scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). Raw domain scores were summed and transformed to a 0- to 100-point scale. Higher scores indicated better quality of life.
Change From Baseline in the Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) VAS Score at Week 24Baseline, Week 24The EQ-5D-5L is a participant-reported assessment designed to measure the participant's well-being. It consists of 5 descriptive items (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and depression/anxiety) and a VAS of the overall health state. Each descriptive item was rated on a 5-point index ranging from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems). The VAS ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).
Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The WPAI Questionnaire is a participant-reported instrument developed to measure the impact on work productivity and regular activities attributable to a specific health problem (migraine). Recall period is the past 7 days. It contains 6 items that measure: 1) employment status, 2) hours missed from work due to the specific health problem, 3) hours missed from work for other reasons, 4) hours actually worked, 5) degree health affected productivity while working, and 6) degree health affected productivity in regular unpaid activities. Four scores were calculated from the responses to these 6 items: absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment. Scores were calculated as impairment percentages (0-100%), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e, worse outcomes.
Change From Baseline in the WPAI Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 24Baseline, Week 24The WPAI Questionnaire is a participant-reported instrument developed to measure the impact on work productivity and regular activities attributable to a specific health problem (migraine). Recall period is the past 7 days. It contains 6 items that measure: 1) employment status, 2) hours missed from work due to the specific health problem, 3) hours missed from work for other reasons, 4) hours actually worked, 5) degree health affected productivity while working, and 6) degree health affected productivity in regular unpaid activities. Four scores were calculated from the responses to these 6 items: absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment. Scores were calculated as impairment percentages (0-100%), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e, worse outcomes.
Percentage of Participants With ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in HIT-6 ScoreBaseline to Week 12The HIT-6 (version 1.0) is a Likert-type, self-reporting questionnaire designed to assess the impact of an occurring headache and its effect on the ability to function normally in daily life. The HIT-6 contains 6 questions, each item was rated from never to always with the following response scores: never = 6, rarely = 8, sometimes = 10, very often = 11, and always = 13. The total score for the HIT-6 was the sum of each response score ranging from 36 to 78. The life impact derived from the total score was described as followed: severe (≥60), substantial (56-59), some (50-55), little to none (≤49).
Percentage of Participants With ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline to Week 24 in HIT-6 ScoreBaseline to Week 24The HIT-6 (version 1.0) is a Likert-type, self-reporting questionnaire designed to assess the impact of an occurring headache and its effect on the ability to function normally in daily life. The HIT-6 contains 6 questions, each item was rated from never to always with the following response scores: never = 6, rarely = 8, sometimes = 10, very often = 11, and always = 13. The total score for the HIT-6 was the sum of each response score ranging from 36 to 78. The life impact derived from the total score was described as followed: severe (≥60), substantial (56-59), some (50-55), little to none (≤49).
Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General PractitionerWeek 12Number of participants who visited to a family doctor/general practitioner has been reported.
HCRU: Visits to a SpecialistWeek 12Number of participants who visited to a specialist has been reported.
HCRU: Number of Emergency Department Visits Due to Your MigraineWeek 12Number of participants who visited to emergency department due to your migraine has been reported.
HCRU: Number of Hospital Admissions Due to MigraineWeek 12Number of participants who admitted in the hospital due to migraine has been reported.
Percentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12Baseline to Weeks 1 - 12A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.
Change From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Baseline, Weeks 25 - 36, 37 - 48, 49 - 60, and 61 - 72A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.
Percentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Baseline to Weeks 25 - 36, 37 - 48, 49 - 60, and 61 - 72A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.
Percentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Baseline to Weeks 25 - 36, 37 - 48, 49 - 60, and 61 - 72A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.
Change From Baseline in HIT-6 Score at Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72Baseline, Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72The HIT-6 (version 1.0) is a Likert-type, self-reporting questionnaire designed to assess the impact of an occurring headache and its effect on the ability to function normally in daily life. The HIT-6 contains 6 questions, each item was rated from never to always with the following response scores: never = 6, rarely = 8, sometimes = 10, very often = 11, and always = 13. The total score for the HIT-6 was the sum of each response score ranging from 36 to 78. The life impact derived from the total score was described as followed: severe (≥60), substantial (56-59), some (50-55), little to none (≤49).
HCRU: Total Number of Overnight Hospital Stays Due to MigraineWeek 12Number of participants who had total number of overnight hospital stays due to migraine has been reported.

Countries

Belgium, Bulgaria, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study included 2 periods: Placebo-controlled Period - 24-week double-blind treatment period with placebo or eptinezumab and Extension Period - 48-week dose-blinded period with eptinezumab after completion of the Placebo-controlled Period.

Pre-assignment details

Participants assigned to placebo in the Placebo-controlled Period were randomized 1:1 to treatment with either eptinezumab 100 milligrams (mg) or eptinezumab 300 mg. Participants assigned to eptinezumab 100 mg or 300 mg in the Placebo-controlled Period continued their treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to eptinezumab by IV infusion on Baseline (Day 0) and on Week 12 in the double-blind treatment period.
298
Eptinezumab 100 mg
Participants received eptinezumab 100 mg by IV infusion on Baseline (Day 0); and thereafter, every 12 weeks up to Week 60 (2 doses in the double-blind treatment period and 4 doses in the dose-blinded extension period).
299
Eptinezumab 300 mg
Participants received eptinezumab 300 mg by IV infusion on Baseline (Day 0); and thereafter, every 12 weeks up to Week 60 (2 doses in the double-blind treatment period and 4 doses in the dose-blinded extension period).
293
Total890

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Extension Period (48 Weeks)Adverse Event029
Extension Period (48 Weeks)Lack of Efficacy01313
Extension Period (48 Weeks)Non-compliance with study drug002
Extension Period (48 Weeks)Other than specified052
Extension Period (48 Weeks)Protocol Violation002
Extension Period (48 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject02114
Placebo-controlled Period (24 Weeks)Adverse Event116
Placebo-controlled Period (24 Weeks)Lack of Efficacy130
Placebo-controlled Period (24 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up010
Placebo-controlled Period (24 Weeks)Other than specified201
Placebo-controlled Period (24 Weeks)Protocol Violation011
Placebo-controlled Period (24 Weeks)Randomized but not treated100
Placebo-controlled Period (24 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject152

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlaceboEptinezumab 100 mgEptinezumab 300 mg
Acute Migraine Medication Days11.1 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.57
11.2 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.93
11.2 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.47
11 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.29
Age, Continuous43.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.61
43.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.83
44.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.76
43.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) Score66.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
66.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.38
66.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
66.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.41
Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score74.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.05
74 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.36
75.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.01
74.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.72
Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ) Subscores
MSQ emotional function
49.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.06
48.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.63
50.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.7
48.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.8
Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ) Subscores
MSQ role function-preventive
50.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.65
50.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.14
50.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.39
51 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.47
Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ) Subscores
MSQ role function-restrictive
35.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.03
35.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.14
35.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.33
35.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.68
MMDs With Use of Acute Medication12.5 days/month
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.49
12.5 days/month
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.62
12.7 days/month
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.48
12.4 days/month
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.38
Monthly Headache Days (MHDs)14.5 days/month
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.62
14.5 days/month
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.79
14.5 days/month
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.63
14.4 days/month
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.45
Monthly Migraine Days (MMDs)13.8 days/month
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.57
13.9 days/month
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.72
13.8 days/month
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.58
13.7 days/month
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.44
Percentage of Headache Episodes With Severe Pain Intensity41.2 percentage of headache episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.38
38.5 percentage of headache episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.29
44.2 percentage of headache episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.56
41 percentage of headache episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.01
Percentage of Migraine Attacks With Severe Pain Intensity43.8 percentage of migraine attacks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.43
40.4 percentage of migraine attacks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.74
47.1 percentage of migraine attacks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.82
43.9 percentage of migraine attacks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.4
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Not collected
884 Participants296 Participants298 Participants290 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants2 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Unknown
34 Participants11 Participants11 Participants12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
854 Participants285 Participants288 Participants281 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
800 Participants263 Participants277 Participants260 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
90 Participants35 Participants22 Participants33 Participants
WPAI Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment
WPAI Absenteeism
12.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.58
12.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.7
11.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.4
12 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.31
WPAI Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment
WPAI Activity impairment
58.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.43
58.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.52
58.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.47
59.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.37
WPAI Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment
WPAI Presenteeism
52 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.58
51.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.22
50.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.61
53.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.01
WPAI Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment
WPAI Work productivity loss
55.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.97
55.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.7
53.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.17
57 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.1

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2980 / 2990 / 2940 / 1450 / 1480 / 2880 / 284
other
Total, other adverse events
85 / 29895 / 29990 / 29457 / 14562 / 148133 / 288118 / 284
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 2986 / 2997 / 2942 / 1457 / 1489 / 2889 / 284

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in the Number of Monthly Migraine Days (MMDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of Monthly Migraine Days (MMDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-2.1 days/monthStandard Error 0.38
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of Monthly Migraine Days (MMDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-4.8 days/monthStandard Error 0.37
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of Monthly Migraine Days (MMDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-5.3 days/monthStandard Error 0.37
Comparison: Analysis was performed using a restricted maximum likelihood (REML)-based mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with month (Weeks 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-20, 21-24), country, stratification factor (monthly MHDs at baseline: ≤14/\>14) and treatment as factors, baseline score as a continuous covariate, treatment-by-month interaction, baseline score-by-month interaction, and stratum-by-month interaction. A testing strategy was applied to ensure protection of the type 1 error.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-3.9, -2.5]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis was performed using an REML-based MMRM with month (Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, Weeks 9-12, Weeks 13-16, Weeks 17-20, Weeks 21-24), country, stratification factor (monthly MHDs at baseline: ≤14/\>14) and treatment as factors, baseline score as a continuous covariate, treatment-by-month interaction, baseline score-by-month interaction, and stratum-by-month interaction.~A testing strategy (sequence of tests) was applied to ensure protection of the type 1 error.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-3.4, -2]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HIT-6 Score at Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72

The HIT-6 (version 1.0) is a Likert-type, self-reporting questionnaire designed to assess the impact of an occurring headache and its effect on the ability to function normally in daily life. The HIT-6 contains 6 questions, each item was rated from never to always with the following response scores: never = 6, rarely = 8, sometimes = 10, very often = 11, and always = 13. The total score for the HIT-6 was the sum of each response score ranging from 36 to 78. The life impact derived from the total score was described as followed: severe (≥60), substantial (56-59), some (50-55), little to none (≤49).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72

Population: FAS\_LT included all randomized participants who received at least 1 infusion of study drug, had a visit in the Extension Period, and who had a valid baseline assessment and a valid assessment of monthly migraine days in the Extension Period. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure. 'Number analyzed' = participants evaluable at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in HIT-6 Score at Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72Change at Week 36-10.01 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.69
PlaceboChange From Baseline in HIT-6 Score at Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72Change at Week 48-10.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
PlaceboChange From Baseline in HIT-6 Score at Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72Change at Week 60-12.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in HIT-6 Score at Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72Change at Week 72-12.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.87
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in HIT-6 Score at Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72Change at Week 48-12.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.75
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in HIT-6 Score at Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72Change at Week 60-13.21 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.71
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in HIT-6 Score at Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72Change at Week 72-15.02 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.78
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in HIT-6 Score at Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72Change at Week 36-12.15 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in HIT-6 Score at Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72Change at Week 60-12.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in HIT-6 Score at Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72Change at Week 48-12.55 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in HIT-6 Score at Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72Change at Week 72-13.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in HIT-6 Score at Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72Change at Week 36-10.99 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.57
Eptinezumab 300 mg to Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in HIT-6 Score at Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72Change at Week 72-14.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
Eptinezumab 300 mg to Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in HIT-6 Score at Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72Change at Week 48-12.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
Eptinezumab 300 mg to Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in HIT-6 Score at Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72Change at Week 36-12.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
Eptinezumab 300 mg to Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in HIT-6 Score at Weeks 36, 48, 60, and 72Change at Week 60-13.15 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) Score at Week 12

The HIT-6 (version 1.0) is a Likert-type, self-reporting questionnaire designed to assess the impact of an occurring headache and its effect on the ability to function normally in daily life. The HIT-6 contains 6 questions, each item was rated from never to always with the following response scores: never = 6, rarely = 8, sometimes = 10, very often = 11, and always = 13. The total score for the HIT-6 was the sum of each response score ranging from 36 to 78. The life impact derived from the total score was described as followed: severe (≥60), substantial (56-59), some (50-55), little to none (≤49).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) Score at Week 12-3.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.61
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) Score at Week 12-6.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.61
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) Score at Week 12-8.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
Comparison: Analysis was performed using MMRM with the following fixed effects: visit, country, stratification factor (MHDs at baseline: ≤14/\>14) and treatment as factors, baseline HIT-6 Total Score as a continuous covariate, baseline score-by-visit interaction, treatment-by-visit interaction, and stratum-by-visit interaction.~A testing strategy (sequence of tests) was applied to ensure protection of the type 1 error.~Testing continued only, if the previous comparison was statistically significant.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-6.7, -4.2]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis was performed using MMRM with the following fixed effects: visit, country, stratification factor (MHDs at baseline: ≤14/\>14) and treatment as factors, baseline HIT-6 Total Score as a continuous covariate, baseline score-by-visit interaction, treatment-by-visit interaction, and stratum-by-visit interaction.~A testing strategy (sequence of tests) was applied to ensure protection of the type 1 error.~Testing continued only, if the previous comparison was statistically significant.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5, -2.5]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) VAS Score at Week 24

The EQ-5D-5L is a participant-reported assessment designed to measure the participant's well-being. It consists of 5 descriptive items (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and depression/anxiety) and a VAS of the overall health state. Each descriptive item was rated on a 5-point index ranging from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems). The VAS ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) VAS Score at Week 24-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) VAS Score at Week 242.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) VAS Score at Week 245.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.37
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12

The EQ-5D-5L is a participant-reported assessment designed to measure the participant's well-being. It consists of 5 descriptive items (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and depression/anxiety) and a VAS of the overall health state. Each descriptive item was rated on a 5-point index ranging from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems). The VAS ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12-3.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.39
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 122.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 124.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the HIT-6 Score at Week 24

The HIT-6 (version 1.0) is a Likert-type, self-reporting questionnaire designed to assess the impact of an occurring headache and its effect on the ability to function normally in daily life. The HIT-6 contains 6 questions, each item was rated from never to always with the following response scores: never = 6, rarely = 8, sometimes = 10, very often = 11, and always = 13. The total score for the HIT-6 was the sum of each response score ranging from 36 to 78. The life impact derived from the total score was described as followed: severe (≥60), substantial (56-59), some (50-55), little to none (≤49).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the HIT-6 Score at Week 24-3.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the HIT-6 Score at Week 24-8.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the HIT-6 Score at Week 24-9.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.62
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ) Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 12

The MSQ is a participant-reported outcome designed to assess the quality of life in participants with migraine. It consists of 14 items covering 3 domains: role function restrictive (7 items); role function preventive (4 items); and emotional function (3 items). Each item was scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). Raw domain scores were summed and transformed to a 0- to 100-point scale. Higher scores indicated better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ) Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 12MSQ Role Function-Preventive11.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ) Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 12MSQ Role Function-Restrictive13.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.75
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ) Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 12MSQ Emotional Function9.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.83
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ) Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 12MSQ Role Function-Preventive22.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.64
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ) Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 12MSQ Role Function-Restrictive25.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.75
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ) Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 12MSQ Emotional Function20.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.84
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ) Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 12MSQ Role Function-Restrictive28.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.72
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ) Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 12MSQ Emotional Function23.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ) Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 12MSQ Role Function-Preventive25.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.61
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the MSQ Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 24

The MSQ is a participant-reported outcome designed to assess the quality of life in participants with migraine. It consists of 14 items covering 3 domains: role function restrictive (7 items); role function preventive (4 items); and emotional function (3 items). Each item was scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). Raw domain scores were summed and transformed to a 0- to 100-point scale. Higher scores indicated better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the MSQ Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 24MSQ Role Function-Preventive13.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the MSQ Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 24MSQ Role Function-Restrictive15.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.76
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the MSQ Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 24MSQ Emotional Function9.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.84
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the MSQ Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 24MSQ Role Function-Preventive25.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.65
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the MSQ Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 24MSQ Role Function-Restrictive30.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.78
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the MSQ Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 24MSQ Emotional Function24.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.86
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the MSQ Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 24MSQ Role Function-Restrictive30.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.73
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the MSQ Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 24MSQ Emotional Function24.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.81
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the MSQ Subscores (Role Function-Restrictive, Role Function-Preventive, Emotional Function) at Week 24MSQ Role Function-Preventive26.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.61
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Number of MHDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

A headache day was defined as a day with a headache that lasted ≥30 minutes or met the definition of a migraine day (as defined in criterion A, B, C, or D above in outcome measure 1).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of MHDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-2.1 days/monthStandard Error 0.38
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MHDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-4.6 days/monthStandard Error 0.37
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MHDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-5.1 days/monthStandard Error 0.37
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24

A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 13 - 24

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24-2.4 days/monthStandard Error 0.39
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24-5.4 days/monthStandard Error 0.39
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24-6.1 days/monthStandard Error 0.39
Comparison: Analysis was performed using an REML-based MMRM with month (Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, Weeks 9-12, Weeks 13-16, Weeks 17-20, Weeks 21-24), country, stratification factor (monthly MHDs at baseline: ≤14/\>14) and treatment as factors, baseline score as a continuous covariate, treatment-by-month interaction, baseline score-by-month interaction, and stratum-by-month interaction.~A testing strategy (sequence of tests) was applied to ensure protection of the type 1 error.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-4.5, -3]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis was performed using an REML-based MMRM with month (Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, Weeks 9-12, Weeks 13-16, Weeks 17-20, Weeks 21-24), country, stratification factor (monthly MHDs at baseline: ≤14/\>14) and treatment as factors, baseline score as a continuous covariate, treatment-by-month interaction, baseline score-by-month interaction, and stratum-by-month interaction.~A testing strategy (sequence of tests) was applied to ensure protection of the type 1 error.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-3.8, -2.2]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72

A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 25 - 36, 37 - 48, 49 - 60, and 61 - 72

Population: Full-analysis-long-term set (FAS\_LT) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 infusion of study drug, had a visit in the Extension Period, and who had a valid baseline assessment and a valid assessment of monthly migraine days in the Extension Period. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure. 'Number analyzed' = participants evaluable at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Change at Weeks 25-36-4.7 days/monthStandard Error 0.49
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Change at Weeks 37-48-5.0 days/monthStandard Error 0.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Change at Weeks 49-60-5.6 days/monthStandard Error 0.51
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Change at Weeks 61-72-5.9 days/monthStandard Error 0.51
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Change at Weeks 37-48-6.0 days/monthStandard Error 0.5
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Change at Weeks 49-60-6.6 days/monthStandard Error 0.51
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Change at Weeks 61-72-6.8 days/monthStandard Error 0.51
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Change at Weeks 25-36-6.1 days/monthStandard Error 0.49
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Change at Weeks 49-60-5.8 days/monthStandard Error 0.41
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Change at Weeks 37-48-5.8 days/monthStandard Error 0.4
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Change at Weeks 61-72-6.6 days/monthStandard Error 0.41
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Change at Weeks 25-36-5.8 days/monthStandard Error 0.39
Eptinezumab 300 mg to Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Change at Weeks 61-72-6.5 days/monthStandard Error 0.41
Eptinezumab 300 mg to Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Change at Weeks 37-48-6.0 days/monthStandard Error 0.4
Eptinezumab 300 mg to Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Change at Weeks 25-36-5.9 days/monthStandard Error 0.39
Eptinezumab 300 mg to Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Change at Weeks 49-60-6.0 days/monthStandard Error 0.41
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Number of MMDs in Participants With Medication Overuse Headache (MOH) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs in Participants With Medication Overuse Headache (MOH) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-2.3 days/monthStandard Error 1.12
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs in Participants With Medication Overuse Headache (MOH) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-5.6 days/monthStandard Error 1.07
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs in Participants With Medication Overuse Headache (MOH) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-7.3 days/monthStandard Error 1.18
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Number of MMDs With Use of Acute Medication Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24

Number of MMDs with acute medication usage was derived using the answer to Did you take any medications to treat this headache? in the headache diary. The question was asked when a participant was ending a headache. Thus, a migraine day with acute medication usage was defined as a migraine day with the extra condition that this question was answered as Yes.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 13 - 24

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs With Use of Acute Medication Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24-2.1 days/monthStandard Error 0.39
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs With Use of Acute Medication Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24-4.9 days/monthStandard Error 0.39
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs With Use of Acute Medication Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24-5.8 days/monthStandard Error 0.38
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Number of MMDs With Use of Acute Medication Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

Number of MMDs with acute medication usage was derived using the answer to Did you take any medications to treat this headache? in the headache diary. The question was asked when a participant was ending a headache. Thus, a migraine day with acute medication usage was defined as a migraine day with the extra condition that this question was answered as Yes.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs With Use of Acute Medication Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-2.0 days/monthStandard Error 0.36
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs With Use of Acute Medication Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-4.6 days/monthStandard Error 0.36
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of MMDs With Use of Acute Medication Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-5.2 days/monthStandard Error 0.36
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Number of Monthly Days With Use of Acute Migraine Medication Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24

In the evening eDiary, participants were asked each day to fill out whether they used any of the following medications during that day: Ergotamine, triptan, analgesic, opioid, or combination analgesic. A day where the participant answered that they took any of those in the evening eDiary was considered a day with use of acute migraine medication.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 13- 24

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of Monthly Days With Use of Acute Migraine Medication Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24-1.7 days/monthStandard Error 0.36
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of Monthly Days With Use of Acute Migraine Medication Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24-4.6 days/monthStandard Error 0.36
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of Monthly Days With Use of Acute Migraine Medication Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24-5.2 days/monthStandard Error 0.36
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Number of Monthly Days With Use of Acute Migraine Medication Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

In the evening eDiary, participants were asked each day to fill out whether they used any of the following medications during that day: Ergotamine, triptan, analgesic, opioid, or combination analgesic. A day where the participant answered that they took any of those in the evening eDiary was considered a day with use of acute migraine medication.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of Monthly Days With Use of Acute Migraine Medication Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-1.6 days/monthStandard Error 0.34
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of Monthly Days With Use of Acute Migraine Medication Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-4.1 days/monthStandard Error 0.33
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Number of Monthly Days With Use of Acute Migraine Medication Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-4.6 days/monthStandard Error 0.34
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Headache Episodes With Severe Pain Intensity Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

A headache episode was defined as a headache lasted ≥30 minutes or that met the criteria for a migraine (as defined in criterion A, B, C, or D above in outcome measure 1).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Headache Episodes With Severe Pain Intensity Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-8.8 percentage of headache episodesStandard Error 1.85
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Headache Episodes With Severe Pain Intensity Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-16.2 percentage of headache episodesStandard Error 1.81
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Headache Episodes With Severe Pain Intensity Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-19.5 percentage of headache episodesStandard Error 1.81
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Migraine Attacks With Severe Pain Intensity Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

A migraine attack was defined as a headache that occurred on a single day or lasted \>1 day and that met the criteria for a migraine day (as defined in criterion A, B, C, or D above in outcome measure 1).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 - 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Migraine Attacks With Severe Pain Intensity Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-10.2 percentage of migraine attacksStandard Error 1.91
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Migraine Attacks With Severe Pain Intensity Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-17.9 percentage of migraine attacksStandard Error 1.87
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Migraine Attacks With Severe Pain Intensity Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12-21.3 percentage of migraine attacksStandard Error 1.87
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 12

The WPAI Questionnaire is a participant-reported instrument developed to measure the impact on work productivity and regular activities attributable to a specific health problem (migraine). Recall period is the past 7 days. It contains 6 items that measure: 1) employment status, 2) hours missed from work due to the specific health problem, 3) hours missed from work for other reasons, 4) hours actually worked, 5) degree health affected productivity while working, and 6) degree health affected productivity in regular unpaid activities. Four scores were calculated from the responses to these 6 items: absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment. Scores were calculated as impairment percentages (0-100%), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e, worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed = participants evaluable for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 12Absenteeism-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.49
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 12Presenteeism-9.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.42
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 12Work productivity loss-9.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.56
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 12Activity impairment-11.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.07
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 12Activity impairment-21.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.07
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 12Absenteeism-5.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.53
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 12Work productivity loss-19.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.61
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 12Presenteeism-19.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.46
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 12Activity impairment-23.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.05
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 12Presenteeism-23.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.4
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 12Work productivity loss-24.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.54
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 12Absenteeism-3.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the WPAI Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 24

The WPAI Questionnaire is a participant-reported instrument developed to measure the impact on work productivity and regular activities attributable to a specific health problem (migraine). Recall period is the past 7 days. It contains 6 items that measure: 1) employment status, 2) hours missed from work due to the specific health problem, 3) hours missed from work for other reasons, 4) hours actually worked, 5) degree health affected productivity while working, and 6) degree health affected productivity in regular unpaid activities. Four scores were calculated from the responses to these 6 items: absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment. Scores were calculated as impairment percentages (0-100%), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e, worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed = participants evaluable for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the WPAI Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 24Absenteeism-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.46
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the WPAI Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 24Presenteeism-7.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.49
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the WPAI Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 24Work productivity loss-7.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.62
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the WPAI Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 24Activity impairment-10.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.07
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the WPAI Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 24Activity impairment-24.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.09
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the WPAI Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 24Absenteeism-5.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.53
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the WPAI Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 24Work productivity loss-22.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.73
Eptinezumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in the WPAI Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 24Presenteeism-22.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.59
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the WPAI Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 24Activity impairment-22.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.04
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the WPAI Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 24Presenteeism-19.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.46
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the WPAI Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 24Work productivity loss-20.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.6
Eptinezumab 300 mgChange From Baseline in the WPAI Questionnaire Subscores (Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Work Productivity Loss, Activity Impairment) at Week 24Absenteeism-5.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.47
Secondary

HCRU: Number of Emergency Department Visits Due to Your Migraine

Number of participants who visited to emergency department due to your migraine has been reported.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboHCRU: Number of Emergency Department Visits Due to Your Migraine3 Visits1 Participants
PlaceboHCRU: Number of Emergency Department Visits Due to Your Migraine2 Visits0 Participants
PlaceboHCRU: Number of Emergency Department Visits Due to Your Migraine0 Visit289 Participants
PlaceboHCRU: Number of Emergency Department Visits Due to Your Migraine1 Visit6 Participants
PlaceboHCRU: Number of Emergency Department Visits Due to Your Migraine8 Visits1 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHCRU: Number of Emergency Department Visits Due to Your Migraine2 Visits1 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHCRU: Number of Emergency Department Visits Due to Your Migraine0 Visit289 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHCRU: Number of Emergency Department Visits Due to Your Migraine1 Visit1 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHCRU: Number of Emergency Department Visits Due to Your Migraine3 Visits0 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHCRU: Number of Emergency Department Visits Due to Your Migraine8 Visits0 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHCRU: Number of Emergency Department Visits Due to Your Migraine8 Visits0 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHCRU: Number of Emergency Department Visits Due to Your Migraine3 Visits0 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHCRU: Number of Emergency Department Visits Due to Your Migraine0 Visit285 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHCRU: Number of Emergency Department Visits Due to Your Migraine2 Visits1 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHCRU: Number of Emergency Department Visits Due to Your Migraine1 Visit3 Participants
Secondary

HCRU: Number of Hospital Admissions Due to Migraine

Number of participants who admitted in the hospital due to migraine has been reported.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboHCRU: Number of Hospital Admissions Due to Migraine0 Visit295 Participants
PlaceboHCRU: Number of Hospital Admissions Due to Migraine1 Visit1 Participants
PlaceboHCRU: Number of Hospital Admissions Due to Migraine2 Visits0 Participants
PlaceboHCRU: Number of Hospital Admissions Due to Migraine4 Visits1 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHCRU: Number of Hospital Admissions Due to Migraine4 Visits0 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHCRU: Number of Hospital Admissions Due to Migraine0 Visit289 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHCRU: Number of Hospital Admissions Due to Migraine2 Visits1 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHCRU: Number of Hospital Admissions Due to Migraine1 Visit1 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHCRU: Number of Hospital Admissions Due to Migraine4 Visits0 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHCRU: Number of Hospital Admissions Due to Migraine1 Visit2 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHCRU: Number of Hospital Admissions Due to Migraine2 Visits0 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHCRU: Number of Hospital Admissions Due to Migraine0 Visit287 Participants
Secondary

HCRU: Total Number of Overnight Hospital Stays Due to Migraine

Number of participants who had total number of overnight hospital stays due to migraine has been reported.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboHCRU: Total Number of Overnight Hospital Stays Due to Migraine1 Visit1 Participants
PlaceboHCRU: Total Number of Overnight Hospital Stays Due to Migraine0 Visit295 Participants
PlaceboHCRU: Total Number of Overnight Hospital Stays Due to Migraine3 Visits1 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHCRU: Total Number of Overnight Hospital Stays Due to Migraine1 Visit0 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHCRU: Total Number of Overnight Hospital Stays Due to Migraine0 Visit290 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHCRU: Total Number of Overnight Hospital Stays Due to Migraine3 Visits1 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHCRU: Total Number of Overnight Hospital Stays Due to Migraine0 Visit289 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHCRU: Total Number of Overnight Hospital Stays Due to Migraine3 Visits0 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHCRU: Total Number of Overnight Hospital Stays Due to Migraine1 Visit0 Participants
Secondary

HCRU: Visits to a Specialist

Number of participants who visited to a specialist has been reported.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboHCRU: Visits to a Specialist6 Visits4 Participants
PlaceboHCRU: Visits to a Specialist3 Visits7 Participants
PlaceboHCRU: Visits to a Specialist2 Visits2 Participants
PlaceboHCRU: Visits to a Specialist1 Visit33 Participants
PlaceboHCRU: Visits to a Specialist0 Visit249 Participants
PlaceboHCRU: Visits to a Specialist8 Visits1 Participants
PlaceboHCRU: Visits to a Specialist5 Visits1 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHCRU: Visits to a Specialist2 Visits2 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHCRU: Visits to a Specialist8 Visits0 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHCRU: Visits to a Specialist0 Visit256 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHCRU: Visits to a Specialist1 Visit31 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHCRU: Visits to a Specialist3 Visits2 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHCRU: Visits to a Specialist5 Visits0 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHCRU: Visits to a Specialist6 Visits0 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHCRU: Visits to a Specialist3 Visits4 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHCRU: Visits to a Specialist0 Visit257 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHCRU: Visits to a Specialist6 Visits0 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHCRU: Visits to a Specialist5 Visits0 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHCRU: Visits to a Specialist2 Visits4 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHCRU: Visits to a Specialist1 Visit24 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHCRU: Visits to a Specialist8 Visits0 Participants
Secondary

Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner

Number of participants who visited to a family doctor/general practitioner has been reported.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner2 Visits6 Participants
PlaceboHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner3 Visits7 Participants
PlaceboHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner8 Visits1 Participants
PlaceboHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner1 Visit35 Participants
PlaceboHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner4 Visits1 Participants
PlaceboHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner6 Visits2 Participants
PlaceboHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner0 Visit244 Participants
PlaceboHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner5 Visits1 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner0 Visit259 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner6 Visits0 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner8 Visits0 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner2 Visits5 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner5 Visits2 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner3 Visits2 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner4 Visits1 Participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner1 Visit22 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner8 Visits0 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner1 Visit22 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner2 Visits6 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner3 Visits3 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner4 Visits1 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner5 Visits1 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner6 Visits0 Participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Visits to a Family Doctor/General Practitioner0 Visit256 Participants
Secondary

Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) Score at Week 12

Participants were asked about their most bothersome symptom associated with their migraines during the Baseline Visit. Participants were asked to rate the improvement in this symptom from baseline on a 7-point scale (1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse) where a high score indicated worsening. Score ranges from 1 (Very Much Improved) to 7 (Very Much Worse). Lower scores indicate better health status. The MBS areas included: nausea, vomiting, sensitivity to light, sensitivity to sound, mental cloudiness, fatigue, pain with activity, mood changes, and other symptoms.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMost Bothersome Symptom (MBS) Score at Week 123.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Eptinezumab 100 mgMost Bothersome Symptom (MBS) Score at Week 122.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Eptinezumab 300 mgMost Bothersome Symptom (MBS) Score at Week 122.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Week 12

The PGIC is a single, participant-reported item reflecting the participant's impression of change in his/her disease status since the start of the study (that is, in relation to activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall quality of life). Participants rated their impression of change in disease status on a 7-point scale (1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse) where a higher score indicated worsening. Score ranges from 1 (Very Much Improved) to 7 (Very Much Worse). Lower scores indicate better health status.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Week 123.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Eptinezumab 100 mgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Week 122.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Eptinezumab 300 mgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Week 122.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 100% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1 - 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 100% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 121.1 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgPercentage of Participants With 100% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 125.9 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 100% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 127.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 100% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days (MHDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

A headache day was defined as a day with a headache that lasted ≥30 minutes or met the definition of a migraine day (as defined in criterion A, B, C, or D above in outcome measure 1).

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1 - 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 100% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days (MHDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 121.1 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgPercentage of Participants With 100% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days (MHDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 124.1 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 100% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days (MHDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 125.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24

A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 13 - 24

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 2423.7 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 2452.3 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 2459.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1 - 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 1213.1 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 1242.1 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 1249.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: Analysis was performed using logistic regression model including baseline MMDs as a continuous covariate, and treatment and stratification factor (MHD at baseline: ≤14/\>14) as factors.~A testing strategy (sequence of tests) was applied to ensure protection of the type 1 error.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [4.41, 10.01]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Analysis was performed using logistic regression model including baseline MMDs as a continuous covariate, and treatment and stratification factor (MHD at baseline: ≤14/\>14) as factors.~A testing strategy (sequence of tests) was applied to ensure protection of the type 1 error.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.29, 7.47]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72

A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 25 - 36, 37 - 48, 49 - 60, and 61 - 72

Population: FAS\_LT included all randomized participants who received at least 1 infusion of study drug, had a visit in the Extension Period, and who had a valid baseline assessment and a valid assessment of monthly migraine days in the Extension Period. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure. 'Number analyzed' = participants evaluable at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 25-3648.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 37-4849.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 49-6059.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 61-7263.5 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 37-4860.3 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 49-6068.6 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 61-7269.9 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 25-3663.0 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 49-6062.6 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 37-4860.6 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 61-7268.3 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 25-3659.6 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mg to Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 61-7265.9 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mg to Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 37-4861.9 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mg to Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 25-3661.0 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mg to Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 49-6062.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days (MHDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

A headache day was defined as a day with a headache that lasted ≥30 minutes or met the definition of a migraine day (as defined in criterion A, B, C, or D above in outcome measure 1).

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1 - 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days (MHDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 1212.8 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days (MHDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 1239.5 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days (MHDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 1245.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in HIT-6 Score

The HIT-6 (version 1.0) is a Likert-type, self-reporting questionnaire designed to assess the impact of an occurring headache and its effect on the ability to function normally in daily life. The HIT-6 contains 6 questions, each item was rated from never to always with the following response scores: never = 6, rarely = 8, sometimes = 10, very often = 11, and always = 13. The total score for the HIT-6 was the sum of each response score ranging from 36 to 78. The life impact derived from the total score was described as followed: severe (≥60), substantial (56-59), some (50-55), little to none (≤49).

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in HIT-6 Score39.9 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in HIT-6 Score62.1 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in HIT-6 Score62.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline to Week 24 in HIT-6 Score

The HIT-6 (version 1.0) is a Likert-type, self-reporting questionnaire designed to assess the impact of an occurring headache and its effect on the ability to function normally in daily life. The HIT-6 contains 6 questions, each item was rated from never to always with the following response scores: never = 6, rarely = 8, sometimes = 10, very often = 11, and always = 13. The total score for the HIT-6 was the sum of each response score ranging from 36 to 78. The life impact derived from the total score was described as followed: severe (≥60), substantial (56-59), some (50-55), little to none (≤49).

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline to Week 24 in HIT-6 Score46.2 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline to Week 24 in HIT-6 Score72.1 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline to Week 24 in HIT-6 Score71.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 24

A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 13 - 24

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 246.8 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 2421.3 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 13 to 2427.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1 - 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 122.0 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 1215.7 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 1218.8 percentage of participants
Comparison: Analysis was performed using logistic regression model including baseline MMDs as a continuous covariate, and treatment and stratification factor (MHD at baseline: ≤14/\>14) as factors.~A testing strategy (sequence of tests) was applied to ensure protection of the type 1 error.~Testing continued only, if the previous comparison was statistically significant.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [5.22, 30.15]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Analysis was performed using logistic regression model including baseline MMDs as a continuous covariate, and treatment and stratification factor (MHD at baseline: ≤14/\>14) as factors.~A testing strategy (sequence of tests) was applied to ensure protection of the type 1 error.~Testing continued only, if the previous comparison was statistically significant.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [4.16, 24.35]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72

A migraine day was defined as any day the participant reported a headache that met criterion A, B, C, or D: Criterion A (all of the following criteria): lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity; and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion B: lasted ≥30 minutes and the participant had an aura with the headache. Criterion C: lasted ≥30 minutes and met ≥2 of the following criteria: lasted ≥4 hours, had ≥2 of the following: unilateral location; pulsating quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by, or causing avoidance of, routine physical activity, and was accompanied by ≥1 of the following: nausea; vomiting; photophobia and phonophobia. Criterion D: the participant took medication to treat the headache because he/she believed he/she was having a migraine.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 25 - 36, 37 - 48, 49 - 60, and 61 - 72

Population: FAS\_LT included all randomized participants who received at least 1 infusion of study drug, had a visit in the Extension Period, and who had a valid baseline assessment and a valid assessment of monthly migraine days in the Extension Period. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure. 'Number analyzed' = participants evaluable at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 25-3619.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 37-4827.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 49-6032.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 61-7236.5 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 37-4830.8 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 49-6033.6 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 61-7239.0 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 25-3628.1 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 49-6029.3 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 37-4831.6 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 61-7237.7 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 25-3625.9 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mg to Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 61-7244.7 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mg to Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 37-4832.6 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mg to Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 25-3631.2 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mg to Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in MMDs Averaged Over Weeks 25 to 36, 37 to 48, 49 to 60, and 61 to 72Weeks 49-6038.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days (MHDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 12

A headache day was defined as a day with a headache that lasted ≥30 minutes or met the definition of a migraine day (as defined in criterion A, B, C, or D above in outcome measure 1).

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1 - 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days (MHDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 122.3 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days (MHDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 1215.1 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥75% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days (MHDs) Averaged Over Weeks 1 to 1216.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Migraine on the Day After First Dosing

Time frame: Day 1

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Migraine on the Day After First Dosing43.7 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Migraine on the Day After First Dosing27.2 percentage of participants
Eptinezumab 300 mgPercentage of Participants With Migraine on the Day After First Dosing24.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

PGIC Score at Week 24

The PGIC is a single, participant-reported item reflecting the participant's impression of change in his/her disease status since the start of the study (that is, in relation to activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall quality of life). Participants rated their impression of change in disease status on a 7-point scale (1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse) where a higher score indicated worsening. Score ranges from 1 (Very Much Improved) to 7 (Very Much Worse). Lower scores indicate better health status.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who had a valid baseline assessment and at least 1 valid post-baseline 4-week assessment of MMDs in Weeks 1 to 12. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPGIC Score at Week 243.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Eptinezumab 100 mgPGIC Score at Week 242.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Eptinezumab 300 mgPGIC Score at Week 242.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026