Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment (EPSIT) Versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) Versus Lay Open Technique

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT04418336

Enrollment

Registered

2020-06-05

Start date

2020-06-01

Completion date

2021-06-02

Last updated

2020-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pilonidal Sinus

Brief summary

Aim of the work To compare Sinus Laser closure versus lay open technique versus Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment as regards recurrence rate, operative data, postoperative pain, intra and postoperative complications, healing time and return to daily activity.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEndoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open technique

Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open technique in sacrococcygeal Pilonidal sinus treatment

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* patients with symptoms from sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus .

Exclusion criteria

* Abscess formation * Immunodeficiency. * Patients with congenital asymptomatic pits. * Patient with psychiatric disease disabling surgical intervention. . Pregnant females.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Recurrence	one year	Recurrence of pilonidal sinus after treatment

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactMohamed Arnouse

drmhamdy@mans.edu.eg01099222561

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026