Dementia
Conditions
Brief summary
The research team will train primary care practitioners from Kansas City clinics to enhance skills in cultural competence, dementia detection, treatment and referral to a Health Navigator among Latinos 65 and older with dementia. The Health Navigator will provide patient/caregiver dyads referred by Alianza Latina providers with care management, psychosocial support and links to relevant community resources. Outcomes include feasibility and acceptability of 1) PCP training and 2) patient and caregiver dementia care.
Detailed description
Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) are a major cause of mortality and disability in later life and cost the US healthcare system more than cancer or heart disease. The National Alzheimer's Plan Act and the National Institutes of Health have identified ADRD disparities among ethnic minorities as a public health priority. Latinos with ADRD experience substantial disparities with reduced rates of early diagnosis and lower quality care compared to their non-Latino white peers, which put them at an increased risk for steeper cognitive decline, morbidity, mortality and higher caregiver burden. A number of barriers conspire to create these disparities including a lack of an evidence-based strategy to address ADRD in clinics, patient and primary care provider (PCP) reduced ADRD knowledge, negative attitudes regarding ADRD, PCP's lack of time, cultural and language barriers and health insurance status. To improve healthcare delivery to Latinos with ADRD, researchers need to redesign current ADRD detection and care systems to follow evidence-based recommendations for early detection and culturally appropriate chronic care. The overall aim of this proposal is to enhance the delivery of ADRD services to Latinos in primary care through a scalable systems approach that includes evidence-based recommendations. Primary care clinics are the ideal setting to provide ADRD services, as 93% of older Latinos have a usual source of healthcare. The novel systems approach (Alianza Latina/Latino Alliance) will enhance timely ADRD diagnosis and optimal care to minimize behavioral symptoms and cognitive decline among Latinos in a linguistically and culturally-appropriate way. Alianza Latina will use the Collaborative Care Framework that capitalizes on PCPs and Health Navigators. 1) PCPs will undergo evidence-based training to enhance timely and culturally appropriate diagnosis and implement it in their work routine. 2) PCPs will detect, treat and refer Latino ADRD patients to a bilingual Health Navigator to provide chronic care management, which will reduce PCP time burden. Aim 2: Test the feasibility and acceptability of Alianza Latina. Aim 2.a: The research team will train PCPs from Kansas City clinics to enhance skills in cultural competence, ADRD detection, treatment and referral to a Health Navigator among Latinos 65 and older with ADRD. Aim 2.b. The Health Navigator will provide patients/caregiver dyads referred by Alianza Latina PCPs with care management, psychosocial support and links to relevant community resources. The research team will assess the feasibility and acceptability of 1) PCP training and 2) patient and caregiver ADRD care. Caregivers will be enrolled in a text messaging program, called CuidaTEXT, that will educate about memory and thinking problems, solve problems that are common among families with memory and thinking problems, send reminders for appointments and medications, and improve communication with the PCP, family, friends, and other resources.
Interventions
The main components of Alianza Latina are 1) providing primary care providers with education, training and tools for timely dementia diagnosis and optimal treatment and 2) providing Latino dementia patients with enhanced chronic care through bilingual Health Navigators.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
for care recipients within the dyad: * Identify as Latino * Community dwelling * Diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or dementia * Have a caregiver 18 years old or older * Have co-participant with access to a privately-owned cell phone with a flat fee for text messages Inclusion Criteria for primary care providers: * Be 18 years old or older * Work as a primary care provider in the US
Exclusion criteria
for care recipients within the dyad: * Not identify as Latino * Not community dwelling * Not diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or dementia * Not having a caregiver 18 years old or older * Not having a co-participant with access to a privately-owned cell phone with a flat fee for text messages
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Provider Recruitment Feasibility | During the 9 months of the provider intervention period | Metrics of the number of providers who agree to be trained per month |
| Provider Retention Feasibility | During the 9 months of the provider intervention period | Metrics of the percentage of providers who continue to partner with the study team by the end of the provider intervention period |
| Provider Fidelity Feasibility 1 | 9 months (end of the provider intervention period) | Percentage of providers able to implement screenings in regular workflow, measured via survey with the question "To what extent were you able to implement screenings in regular workflow" with three response options: "not at all", "to some degree", "usually", "almost always" and "always" |
| Provider Assessment Feasibility 1 | During the 9 months of the provider intervention period | Metrics of the percentage of providers who complete baseline and follow-up surveys about dementia knowledge, attitudes and skills |
| Provider Fidelity Feasibility 2 | During the 9 months of the provider intervention period | Metrics of the Number of referrals to Health Navigator per month |
| Overall Provider Satisfaction With Training | 9 months (end of the provider intervention period) | Survey question including a 5-item Likert scale on satisfaction with training (not at all to very much) |
| Importance of Navigators to Providers | 9 months (end of the provider intervention period) | Survey question including a 5-item Likert scale on the perceived importance of Navigators to providers (not at all to very much) |
| Participant Recruitment Fidelity | During the 15 months of the whole intervention period | Metrics of percentage of referred Latino dementia dyads who enroll in Health Navigator services |
| Participant Retention Fidelity | During the 6 months of the Navigator intervention period | Metrics of percentage of referred Latino dementia dyads followed up at six months |
| Participant Assessment Fidelity | During the 6 months of the Navigator intervention period | Metrics of the percentage of planned baseline and follow-up survey ratings completed |
| Participant Treatment Adherence | During the 6 months of the Navigator intervention period | Metrics of the percentage of referred Latino dementia dyads who attend at least 50% of Health Navigator visits |
| Overall Participant Satisfaction With the Clinic Side of the Intervention | 6 months after baseline | Survey question including a 5-item Likert scale on caregivers' satisfaction with clinic services (not at all to very much) |
| Overall Participant Satisfaction With the Navigator Side of the Intervention | 6 months after baseline | Survey question to the caregiver including a 5-item Likert scale on satisfaction with Navigator services (not at all to very much) |
| Participant Suggestions of Improvement | 6 months after baseline | Survey question to the caregiver including an open-ended question about which aspects of the intervention they would change |
| Practitioner Adherence to Guideline Recommendations | 6 months after baseline | 10-item checklist administered to the dyads asking about the implementations of different aspects of dementia service guidelines |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patients' Behavioral Symptoms | Baseline and 6 months from baseline | Brief version of the Neuropsychiatry Inventory Questionnaire: This is a validated clinical instrument for evaluating psychopathology in dementia. If any of the 12 neuropsychiatric symptoms is present, caregivers rate their loved one's severity on a three-point scale (mild-severe). For example, if the caregiver responds yes to "is the patient resistive to help from others at times, or hard to handle?", the following question would follow: "rate the severity of the symptom". An overall severity summary score is calculated by adding the severity scores of all items, ranging from 0 to 36, and higher scores mean higher severity. |
| Patients' Depression | Baseline and 6 months from baseline | Short Geriatric Depression Scale: This scale measures depressive symptomatology, and consists of 15 yes vs no questions. Of the 15 items, 10 indicate the presence of depression when answered positively, while the rest (question numbers 1, 5, 7, 11, 13) indicate depression when answered negatively. A summary score is obtained ranging from 0 to 15, with higher scores meaning more severe depressive symptomatology. |
| Patients' Quality of Life | Baseline and 6 months from baseline | Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease: The Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease is comprised of 13 items (physical health, energy, mood, living situation, memory, family, marriage, friends, self as a whole, ability to do chores, ability to do things for fun, money and life as a whole). Response options include 1(poor), 2(fair), 3(good) and 4 (excellent), for a total score of 13-52, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. |
| Caregivers' Quality of Life | Baseline and 6 months from baseline | In general, how satisfied are you with your life?" with a 4-point scale from 1 (Very Satisfied) to 4 (Very Dissatisfied) |
| Caregivers' Depression | Baseline and 6 months from baseline | 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale (CES-D-10): This is a 10-item, self-report rating scale that measures characteristic symptoms of depression in the past week (e.g. depression, loneliness, restless sleep). Each item is rated on a 4-point scale, from 0 (rarely or none of the time) to 3 (most or all of the time) with positively worded items (items 5 and 8) reverse scored. Items yield summary scores that range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher severity. An example of an item is: "I was bothered by things that usually don't bother me" |
| Caregivers' Burden | Baseline and 6 months from baseline | Short Zarit Burden Interview: This caregiver burden scale has 6 items that address the perceived impact of the act of providing care on the physical health, emotional health, social activities and financial situation of the caregiver. Each item has five response options ranging from "never" to "nearly always". A total score is obtained by adding scores in all items, with a range from 0 to 24. Higher scores mean higher burden. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
KUMC
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
This study includes 100 dyads. Each dyad is formed by a unique caregiver and a care recipient. Ten care recipients are in more than one dyad, as more than one of their caregivers participated in the study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Alianza Latina The main components of Alianza Latina are 1) providing primary care providers with education, training and tools for timely dementia diagnosis and optimal treatment and 2) providing Latino dementia patients with enhanced chronic care through bilingual Health Navigators. | 243 |
| Total | 243 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Alianza Latina |
|---|---|
| Age, Categorical Caregivers <=18 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Caregivers >=65 years | 10 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Caregivers Between 18 and 65 years | 90 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Care recipients <=18 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Care recipients >=65 years | 76 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Care recipients Between 18 and 65 years | 8 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Primary care providers <=18 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Primary care providers >=65 years | 12 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Primary care providers Between 18 and 65 years | 47 Participants |
| Age, Continuous Caregivers | 52.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 |
| Age, Continuous Care recipients | 78.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 |
| Age, Continuous Primary care providers | 49.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 |
| Caregivers' relation to care recipients Children | 73 Participants |
| Caregivers' relation to care recipients Children-in-law | 4 Participants |
| Caregivers' relation to care recipients Other | 12 Participants |
| Caregivers' relation to care recipients Partner | 11 Participants |
| Dementia diagnosis Alzheimer's dementia | 38 Participants |
| Dementia diagnosis Frontotemporal dementia | 2 Participants |
| Dementia diagnosis Lewy Bodies/Parkinson's dementia | 5 Participants |
| Dementia diagnosis Mild Cognitive Impairment | 1 Participants |
| Dementia diagnosis Mixed dementia | 4 Participants |
| Dementia diagnosis Other | 2 Participants |
| Dementia diagnosis Unspecified dementia | 27 Participants |
| Dementia diagnosis Vascular dementia | 5 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Caregivers Hispanic or Latino | 95 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Caregivers Not Hispanic or Latino | 4 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Caregivers Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Care recipients Hispanic or Latino | 84 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Care recipients Not Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Care recipients Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Primary care providers Hispanic or Latino | 3 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Primary care providers Not Hispanic or Latino | 50 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Primary care providers Unknown or Not Reported | 6 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Caregivers American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Caregivers Asian | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Caregivers Black or African American | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Caregivers More than one race | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Caregivers Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Caregivers Unknown or Not Reported | 72 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Caregivers White | 25 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Care recipients American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Care recipients Asian | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Care recipients Black or African American | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Care recipients More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Care recipients Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Care recipients Unknown or Not Reported | 68 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Care recipients White | 15 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Primary care providers American Indian or Alaska Native | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Primary care providers Asian | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Primary care providers Black or African American | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Primary care providers More than one race | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Primary care providers Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Primary care providers Unknown or Not Reported | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Primary care providers White | 46 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 243 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Caregivers Female | 82 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Caregivers Male | 18 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Care recipients Female | 71 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Care recipients Male | 13 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Primary care providers Female | 42 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Primary care providers Male | 17 Participants |
| Years of education Caregivers | 12.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4 |
| Years of education Care recipients | 11.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.4 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 6 / 243 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 0 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 0 |
Outcome results
Importance of Navigators to Providers
Survey question including a 5-item Likert scale on the perceived importance of Navigators to providers (not at all to very much)
Time frame: 9 months (end of the provider intervention period)
Population: Primary care providers that are part of Aim 2a (Only among the people who reported using health navigators)
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Importance of Navigators to Providers | Not at all | 0 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Importance of Navigators to Providers | Slightly | 0 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Importance of Navigators to Providers | Moderately | 0 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Importance of Navigators to Providers | Very much | 0 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Importance of Navigators to Providers | Extremely | 1 Participants |
Overall Participant Satisfaction With the Clinic Side of the Intervention
Survey question including a 5-item Likert scale on caregivers' satisfaction with clinic services (not at all to very much)
Time frame: 6 months after baseline
Population: Participants responding to these are caregivers
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Overall Participant Satisfaction With the Clinic Side of the Intervention | Not at all | 7 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Overall Participant Satisfaction With the Clinic Side of the Intervention | Somehow | 13 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Overall Participant Satisfaction With the Clinic Side of the Intervention | Very | 52 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Overall Participant Satisfaction With the Clinic Side of the Intervention | Extremely | 15 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Overall Participant Satisfaction With the Clinic Side of the Intervention | Missing | 12 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Overall Participant Satisfaction With the Clinic Side of the Intervention | Does not know | 1 Participants |
Overall Participant Satisfaction With the Navigator Side of the Intervention
Survey question to the caregiver including a 5-item Likert scale on satisfaction with Navigator services (not at all to very much)
Time frame: 6 months after baseline
Population: Participants responding to these are caregivers
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Overall Participant Satisfaction With the Navigator Side of the Intervention | Not at all | 0 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Overall Participant Satisfaction With the Navigator Side of the Intervention | Somehow | 5 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Overall Participant Satisfaction With the Navigator Side of the Intervention | Very | 43 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Overall Participant Satisfaction With the Navigator Side of the Intervention | Extremely | 40 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Overall Participant Satisfaction With the Navigator Side of the Intervention | Missing | 12 Participants |
Overall Provider Satisfaction With Training
Survey question including a 5-item Likert scale on satisfaction with training (not at all to very much)
Time frame: 9 months (end of the provider intervention period)
Population: Primary care providers that are part of Aim 2a
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Overall Provider Satisfaction With Training | Not at all | 0 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Overall Provider Satisfaction With Training | Slightly | 2 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Overall Provider Satisfaction With Training | Moderately | 4 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Overall Provider Satisfaction With Training | very much | 15 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Overall Provider Satisfaction With Training | Extremely | 21 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Overall Provider Satisfaction With Training | Missing | 17 Participants |
Participant Assessment Fidelity
Metrics of the percentage of planned baseline and follow-up survey ratings completed
Time frame: During the 6 months of the Navigator intervention period
Population: Participants responding to these are dyads (caregivers and, when possible, care recipients)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Participant Assessment Fidelity | 77 Percent of dyads |
Participant Recruitment Fidelity
Metrics of percentage of referred Latino dementia dyads who enroll in Health Navigator services
Time frame: During the 15 months of the whole intervention period
Population: The Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is greater than the number Started in the Participant Flow because this variable reports the dyads who end up enrolling (100) out of the ones referred (127)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Participant Recruitment Fidelity | 78.7 Percentage of dyads |
Participant Retention Fidelity
Metrics of percentage of referred Latino dementia dyads followed up at six months
Time frame: During the 6 months of the Navigator intervention period
Population: The Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is greater than the number Started in the Participant Flow because this variable reports the dyads who are followed up (88) out of the ones referred (127)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Participant Retention Fidelity | 69.3 Percentage of dyads |
Participant Suggestions of Improvement
Survey question to the caregiver including an open-ended question about which aspects of the intervention they would change
Time frame: 6 months after baseline
Population: Participants responding to these are caregivers
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Participant Suggestions of Improvement | Responded | 88 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Participant Suggestions of Improvement | Missing | 12 Participants |
Participant Treatment Adherence
Metrics of the percentage of referred Latino dementia dyads who attend at least 50% of Health Navigator visits
Time frame: During the 6 months of the Navigator intervention period
Population: Participants responding to these are dyads (caregivers and, when possible, care recipients)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Participant Treatment Adherence | 29 Percentage of dyads |
Practitioner Adherence to Guideline Recommendations
10-item checklist administered to the dyads asking about the implementations of different aspects of dementia service guidelines
Time frame: 6 months after baseline
Population: 87 respondents
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Practitioner Adherence to Guideline Recommendations | 9 Guideline Items in the checklist covered |
Provider Assessment Feasibility 1
Metrics of the percentage of providers who complete baseline and follow-up surveys about dementia knowledge, attitudes and skills
Time frame: During the 9 months of the provider intervention period
Population: Primary care providers that are part of Aim 2a
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Provider Assessment Feasibility 1 | 43 Participants |
Provider Fidelity Feasibility 1
Percentage of providers able to implement screenings in regular workflow, measured via survey with the question To what extent were you able to implement screenings in regular workflow with three response options: not at all, to some degree, usually, almost always and always
Time frame: 9 months (end of the provider intervention period)
Population: Primary care providers that are part of Aim 2a
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Provider Fidelity Feasibility 1 | not at all | 1 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Provider Fidelity Feasibility 1 | to some degree | 5 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Provider Fidelity Feasibility 1 | usually | 19 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Provider Fidelity Feasibility 1 | almost always | 9 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Provider Fidelity Feasibility 1 | always | 8 Participants |
| Alianza Latina | Provider Fidelity Feasibility 1 | Missing | 17 Participants |
Provider Fidelity Feasibility 2
Metrics of the Number of referrals to Health Navigator per month
Time frame: During the 9 months of the provider intervention period
Population: Primary care providers that are part of Aim 2a
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Provider Fidelity Feasibility 2 | 5.77 Referrals per month | Standard Deviation 3.45 |
Provider Recruitment Feasibility
Metrics of the number of providers who agree to be trained per month
Time frame: During the 9 months of the provider intervention period
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Provider Recruitment Feasibility | 1.44 Providers trained per month | Standard Deviation 2.74 |
Provider Retention Feasibility
Metrics of the percentage of providers who continue to partner with the study team by the end of the provider intervention period
Time frame: During the 9 months of the provider intervention period
Population: Primary care providers that are part of Aim 2a
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Provider Retention Feasibility | 11 Participants |
Caregivers' Burden
Short Zarit Burden Interview: This caregiver burden scale has 6 items that address the perceived impact of the act of providing care on the physical health, emotional health, social activities and financial situation of the caregiver. Each item has five response options ranging from never to nearly always. A total score is obtained by adding scores in all items, with a range from 0 to 24. Higher scores mean higher burden.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months from baseline
Population: Participants responding to these are caregivers on their behalf
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Caregivers' Burden | 0.34 Change in units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.32 |
Caregivers' Depression
10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale (CES-D-10): This is a 10-item, self-report rating scale that measures characteristic symptoms of depression in the past week (e.g. depression, loneliness, restless sleep). Each item is rated on a 4-point scale, from 0 (rarely or none of the time) to 3 (most or all of the time) with positively worded items (items 5 and 8) reverse scored. Items yield summary scores that range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher severity. An example of an item is: I was bothered by things that usually don't bother me
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months from baseline
Population: Participants responding to these are caregivers on their behalf
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Caregivers' Depression | -0.43 Change in units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.22 |
Caregivers' Quality of Life
In general, how satisfied are you with your life? with a 4-point scale from 1 (Very Satisfied) to 4 (Very Dissatisfied)
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months from baseline
Population: Participants responding to these are caregivers on their behalf
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Caregivers' Quality of Life | 0.14 Change in units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.79 |
Patients' Behavioral Symptoms
Brief version of the Neuropsychiatry Inventory Questionnaire: This is a validated clinical instrument for evaluating psychopathology in dementia. If any of the 12 neuropsychiatric symptoms is present, caregivers rate their loved one's severity on a three-point scale (mild-severe). For example, if the caregiver responds yes to is the patient resistive to help from others at times, or hard to handle?, the following question would follow: rate the severity of the symptom. An overall severity summary score is calculated by adding the severity scores of all items, ranging from 0 to 36, and higher scores mean higher severity.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months from baseline
Population: Participants responding to these are caregivers on behalf of care recipients
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Patients' Behavioral Symptoms | 0.58 Change in units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.93 |
Patients' Depression
Short Geriatric Depression Scale: This scale measures depressive symptomatology, and consists of 15 yes vs no questions. Of the 15 items, 10 indicate the presence of depression when answered positively, while the rest (question numbers 1, 5, 7, 11, 13) indicate depression when answered negatively. A summary score is obtained ranging from 0 to 15, with higher scores meaning more severe depressive symptomatology.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months from baseline
Population: Participants responding to these are caregivers on behalf of care recipients or care recipients themselves when possible
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Patients' Depression | -0.71 Change in units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.53 |
Patients' Quality of Life
Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease: The Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease is comprised of 13 items (physical health, energy, mood, living situation, memory, family, marriage, friends, self as a whole, ability to do chores, ability to do things for fun, money and life as a whole). Response options include 1(poor), 2(fair), 3(good) and 4 (excellent), for a total score of 13-52, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months from baseline
Population: Participants responding to these are caregivers on behalf of care recipients or care recipients themselves when possible
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alianza Latina | Patients' Quality of Life | 0.42 Change in units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.07 |