Skip to content

Feasibility of a Systems Approach for Alzheimer's Services Among Latinos Attending Primary Care Practices

Feasibility of a Novel Systems Approach for Improving Utilization of Alzheimer's Disease Services Among Latinos Attending Primary Care Practices

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04418232
Enrollment
243
Registered
2020-06-05
Start date
2022-05-01
Completion date
2024-08-20
Last updated
2026-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dementia

Brief summary

The research team will train primary care practitioners from Kansas City clinics to enhance skills in cultural competence, dementia detection, treatment and referral to a Health Navigator among Latinos 65 and older with dementia. The Health Navigator will provide patient/caregiver dyads referred by Alianza Latina providers with care management, psychosocial support and links to relevant community resources. Outcomes include feasibility and acceptability of 1) PCP training and 2) patient and caregiver dementia care.

Detailed description

Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) are a major cause of mortality and disability in later life and cost the US healthcare system more than cancer or heart disease. The National Alzheimer's Plan Act and the National Institutes of Health have identified ADRD disparities among ethnic minorities as a public health priority. Latinos with ADRD experience substantial disparities with reduced rates of early diagnosis and lower quality care compared to their non-Latino white peers, which put them at an increased risk for steeper cognitive decline, morbidity, mortality and higher caregiver burden. A number of barriers conspire to create these disparities including a lack of an evidence-based strategy to address ADRD in clinics, patient and primary care provider (PCP) reduced ADRD knowledge, negative attitudes regarding ADRD, PCP's lack of time, cultural and language barriers and health insurance status. To improve healthcare delivery to Latinos with ADRD, researchers need to redesign current ADRD detection and care systems to follow evidence-based recommendations for early detection and culturally appropriate chronic care. The overall aim of this proposal is to enhance the delivery of ADRD services to Latinos in primary care through a scalable systems approach that includes evidence-based recommendations. Primary care clinics are the ideal setting to provide ADRD services, as 93% of older Latinos have a usual source of healthcare. The novel systems approach (Alianza Latina/Latino Alliance) will enhance timely ADRD diagnosis and optimal care to minimize behavioral symptoms and cognitive decline among Latinos in a linguistically and culturally-appropriate way. Alianza Latina will use the Collaborative Care Framework that capitalizes on PCPs and Health Navigators. 1) PCPs will undergo evidence-based training to enhance timely and culturally appropriate diagnosis and implement it in their work routine. 2) PCPs will detect, treat and refer Latino ADRD patients to a bilingual Health Navigator to provide chronic care management, which will reduce PCP time burden. Aim 2: Test the feasibility and acceptability of Alianza Latina. Aim 2.a: The research team will train PCPs from Kansas City clinics to enhance skills in cultural competence, ADRD detection, treatment and referral to a Health Navigator among Latinos 65 and older with ADRD. Aim 2.b. The Health Navigator will provide patients/caregiver dyads referred by Alianza Latina PCPs with care management, psychosocial support and links to relevant community resources. The research team will assess the feasibility and acceptability of 1) PCP training and 2) patient and caregiver ADRD care. Caregivers will be enrolled in a text messaging program, called CuidaTEXT, that will educate about memory and thinking problems, solve problems that are common among families with memory and thinking problems, send reminders for appointments and medications, and improve communication with the PCP, family, friends, and other resources.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTAlianza Latina

The main components of Alianza Latina are 1) providing primary care providers with education, training and tools for timely dementia diagnosis and optimal treatment and 2) providing Latino dementia patients with enhanced chronic care through bilingual Health Navigators.

Sponsors

University of Kansas Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

for care recipients within the dyad: * Identify as Latino * Community dwelling * Diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or dementia * Have a caregiver 18 years old or older * Have co-participant with access to a privately-owned cell phone with a flat fee for text messages Inclusion Criteria for primary care providers: * Be 18 years old or older * Work as a primary care provider in the US

Exclusion criteria

for care recipients within the dyad: * Not identify as Latino * Not community dwelling * Not diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or dementia * Not having a caregiver 18 years old or older * Not having a co-participant with access to a privately-owned cell phone with a flat fee for text messages

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Provider Recruitment FeasibilityDuring the 9 months of the provider intervention periodMetrics of the number of providers who agree to be trained per month
Provider Retention FeasibilityDuring the 9 months of the provider intervention periodMetrics of the percentage of providers who continue to partner with the study team by the end of the provider intervention period
Provider Fidelity Feasibility 19 months (end of the provider intervention period)Percentage of providers able to implement screenings in regular workflow, measured via survey with the question "To what extent were you able to implement screenings in regular workflow" with three response options: "not at all", "to some degree", "usually", "almost always" and "always"
Provider Assessment Feasibility 1During the 9 months of the provider intervention periodMetrics of the percentage of providers who complete baseline and follow-up surveys about dementia knowledge, attitudes and skills
Provider Fidelity Feasibility 2During the 9 months of the provider intervention periodMetrics of the Number of referrals to Health Navigator per month
Overall Provider Satisfaction With Training9 months (end of the provider intervention period)Survey question including a 5-item Likert scale on satisfaction with training (not at all to very much)
Importance of Navigators to Providers9 months (end of the provider intervention period)Survey question including a 5-item Likert scale on the perceived importance of Navigators to providers (not at all to very much)
Participant Recruitment FidelityDuring the 15 months of the whole intervention periodMetrics of percentage of referred Latino dementia dyads who enroll in Health Navigator services
Participant Retention FidelityDuring the 6 months of the Navigator intervention periodMetrics of percentage of referred Latino dementia dyads followed up at six months
Participant Assessment FidelityDuring the 6 months of the Navigator intervention periodMetrics of the percentage of planned baseline and follow-up survey ratings completed
Participant Treatment AdherenceDuring the 6 months of the Navigator intervention periodMetrics of the percentage of referred Latino dementia dyads who attend at least 50% of Health Navigator visits
Overall Participant Satisfaction With the Clinic Side of the Intervention6 months after baselineSurvey question including a 5-item Likert scale on caregivers' satisfaction with clinic services (not at all to very much)
Overall Participant Satisfaction With the Navigator Side of the Intervention6 months after baselineSurvey question to the caregiver including a 5-item Likert scale on satisfaction with Navigator services (not at all to very much)
Participant Suggestions of Improvement6 months after baselineSurvey question to the caregiver including an open-ended question about which aspects of the intervention they would change
Practitioner Adherence to Guideline Recommendations6 months after baseline10-item checklist administered to the dyads asking about the implementations of different aspects of dementia service guidelines

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patients' Behavioral SymptomsBaseline and 6 months from baselineBrief version of the Neuropsychiatry Inventory Questionnaire: This is a validated clinical instrument for evaluating psychopathology in dementia. If any of the 12 neuropsychiatric symptoms is present, caregivers rate their loved one's severity on a three-point scale (mild-severe). For example, if the caregiver responds yes to "is the patient resistive to help from others at times, or hard to handle?", the following question would follow: "rate the severity of the symptom". An overall severity summary score is calculated by adding the severity scores of all items, ranging from 0 to 36, and higher scores mean higher severity.
Patients' DepressionBaseline and 6 months from baselineShort Geriatric Depression Scale: This scale measures depressive symptomatology, and consists of 15 yes vs no questions. Of the 15 items, 10 indicate the presence of depression when answered positively, while the rest (question numbers 1, 5, 7, 11, 13) indicate depression when answered negatively. A summary score is obtained ranging from 0 to 15, with higher scores meaning more severe depressive symptomatology.
Patients' Quality of LifeBaseline and 6 months from baselineQuality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease: The Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease is comprised of 13 items (physical health, energy, mood, living situation, memory, family, marriage, friends, self as a whole, ability to do chores, ability to do things for fun, money and life as a whole). Response options include 1(poor), 2(fair), 3(good) and 4 (excellent), for a total score of 13-52, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Caregivers' Quality of LifeBaseline and 6 months from baselineIn general, how satisfied are you with your life?" with a 4-point scale from 1 (Very Satisfied) to 4 (Very Dissatisfied)
Caregivers' DepressionBaseline and 6 months from baseline10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale (CES-D-10): This is a 10-item, self-report rating scale that measures characteristic symptoms of depression in the past week (e.g. depression, loneliness, restless sleep). Each item is rated on a 4-point scale, from 0 (rarely or none of the time) to 3 (most or all of the time) with positively worded items (items 5 and 8) reverse scored. Items yield summary scores that range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher severity. An example of an item is: "I was bothered by things that usually don't bother me"
Caregivers' BurdenBaseline and 6 months from baselineShort Zarit Burden Interview: This caregiver burden scale has 6 items that address the perceived impact of the act of providing care on the physical health, emotional health, social activities and financial situation of the caregiver. Each item has five response options ranging from "never" to "nearly always". A total score is obtained by adding scores in all items, with a range from 0 to 24. Higher scores mean higher burden.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJaime Perales Puchalt, PhD, MPH

KUMC

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

This study includes 100 dyads. Each dyad is formed by a unique caregiver and a care recipient. Ten care recipients are in more than one dyad, as more than one of their caregivers participated in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Alianza Latina
The main components of Alianza Latina are 1) providing primary care providers with education, training and tools for timely dementia diagnosis and optimal treatment and 2) providing Latino dementia patients with enhanced chronic care through bilingual Health Navigators.
243
Total243

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAlianza Latina
Age, Categorical
Caregivers
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Caregivers
>=65 years
10 Participants
Age, Categorical
Caregivers
Between 18 and 65 years
90 Participants
Age, Categorical
Care recipients
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Care recipients
>=65 years
76 Participants
Age, Categorical
Care recipients
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants
Age, Categorical
Primary care providers
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Primary care providers
>=65 years
12 Participants
Age, Categorical
Primary care providers
Between 18 and 65 years
47 Participants
Age, Continuous
Caregivers
52.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
Age, Continuous
Care recipients
78.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
Age, Continuous
Primary care providers
49.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
Caregivers' relation to care recipients
Children
73 Participants
Caregivers' relation to care recipients
Children-in-law
4 Participants
Caregivers' relation to care recipients
Other
12 Participants
Caregivers' relation to care recipients
Partner
11 Participants
Dementia diagnosis
Alzheimer's dementia
38 Participants
Dementia diagnosis
Frontotemporal dementia
2 Participants
Dementia diagnosis
Lewy Bodies/Parkinson's dementia
5 Participants
Dementia diagnosis
Mild Cognitive Impairment
1 Participants
Dementia diagnosis
Mixed dementia
4 Participants
Dementia diagnosis
Other
2 Participants
Dementia diagnosis
Unspecified dementia
27 Participants
Dementia diagnosis
Vascular dementia
5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Hispanic or Latino
95 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Not Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Care recipients
Hispanic or Latino
84 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Care recipients
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Care recipients
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Primary care providers
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Primary care providers
Not Hispanic or Latino
50 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Primary care providers
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
More than one race
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Unknown or Not Reported
72 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
White
25 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Care recipients
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Care recipients
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Care recipients
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Care recipients
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Care recipients
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Care recipients
Unknown or Not Reported
68 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Care recipients
White
15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Primary care providers
American Indian or Alaska Native
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Primary care providers
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Primary care providers
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Primary care providers
More than one race
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Primary care providers
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Primary care providers
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Primary care providers
White
46 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
243 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Caregivers
Female
82 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Caregivers
Male
18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Care recipients
Female
71 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Care recipients
Male
13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Primary care providers
Female
42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Primary care providers
Male
17 Participants
Years of education
Caregivers
12.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
Years of education
Care recipients
11.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.4

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
6 / 243
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Importance of Navigators to Providers

Survey question including a 5-item Likert scale on the perceived importance of Navigators to providers (not at all to very much)

Time frame: 9 months (end of the provider intervention period)

Population: Primary care providers that are part of Aim 2a (Only among the people who reported using health navigators)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Alianza LatinaImportance of Navigators to ProvidersNot at all0 Participants
Alianza LatinaImportance of Navigators to ProvidersSlightly0 Participants
Alianza LatinaImportance of Navigators to ProvidersModerately0 Participants
Alianza LatinaImportance of Navigators to ProvidersVery much0 Participants
Alianza LatinaImportance of Navigators to ProvidersExtremely1 Participants
Primary

Overall Participant Satisfaction With the Clinic Side of the Intervention

Survey question including a 5-item Likert scale on caregivers' satisfaction with clinic services (not at all to very much)

Time frame: 6 months after baseline

Population: Participants responding to these are caregivers

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Alianza LatinaOverall Participant Satisfaction With the Clinic Side of the InterventionNot at all7 Participants
Alianza LatinaOverall Participant Satisfaction With the Clinic Side of the InterventionSomehow13 Participants
Alianza LatinaOverall Participant Satisfaction With the Clinic Side of the InterventionVery52 Participants
Alianza LatinaOverall Participant Satisfaction With the Clinic Side of the InterventionExtremely15 Participants
Alianza LatinaOverall Participant Satisfaction With the Clinic Side of the InterventionMissing12 Participants
Alianza LatinaOverall Participant Satisfaction With the Clinic Side of the InterventionDoes not know1 Participants
Primary

Overall Participant Satisfaction With the Navigator Side of the Intervention

Survey question to the caregiver including a 5-item Likert scale on satisfaction with Navigator services (not at all to very much)

Time frame: 6 months after baseline

Population: Participants responding to these are caregivers

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Alianza LatinaOverall Participant Satisfaction With the Navigator Side of the InterventionNot at all0 Participants
Alianza LatinaOverall Participant Satisfaction With the Navigator Side of the InterventionSomehow5 Participants
Alianza LatinaOverall Participant Satisfaction With the Navigator Side of the InterventionVery43 Participants
Alianza LatinaOverall Participant Satisfaction With the Navigator Side of the InterventionExtremely40 Participants
Alianza LatinaOverall Participant Satisfaction With the Navigator Side of the InterventionMissing12 Participants
Primary

Overall Provider Satisfaction With Training

Survey question including a 5-item Likert scale on satisfaction with training (not at all to very much)

Time frame: 9 months (end of the provider intervention period)

Population: Primary care providers that are part of Aim 2a

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Alianza LatinaOverall Provider Satisfaction With TrainingNot at all0 Participants
Alianza LatinaOverall Provider Satisfaction With TrainingSlightly2 Participants
Alianza LatinaOverall Provider Satisfaction With TrainingModerately4 Participants
Alianza LatinaOverall Provider Satisfaction With Trainingvery much15 Participants
Alianza LatinaOverall Provider Satisfaction With TrainingExtremely21 Participants
Alianza LatinaOverall Provider Satisfaction With TrainingMissing17 Participants
Primary

Participant Assessment Fidelity

Metrics of the percentage of planned baseline and follow-up survey ratings completed

Time frame: During the 6 months of the Navigator intervention period

Population: Participants responding to these are dyads (caregivers and, when possible, care recipients)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Alianza LatinaParticipant Assessment Fidelity77 Percent of dyads
Primary

Participant Recruitment Fidelity

Metrics of percentage of referred Latino dementia dyads who enroll in Health Navigator services

Time frame: During the 15 months of the whole intervention period

Population: The Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is greater than the number Started in the Participant Flow because this variable reports the dyads who end up enrolling (100) out of the ones referred (127)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Alianza LatinaParticipant Recruitment Fidelity78.7 Percentage of dyads
Primary

Participant Retention Fidelity

Metrics of percentage of referred Latino dementia dyads followed up at six months

Time frame: During the 6 months of the Navigator intervention period

Population: The Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is greater than the number Started in the Participant Flow because this variable reports the dyads who are followed up (88) out of the ones referred (127)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Alianza LatinaParticipant Retention Fidelity69.3 Percentage of dyads
Primary

Participant Suggestions of Improvement

Survey question to the caregiver including an open-ended question about which aspects of the intervention they would change

Time frame: 6 months after baseline

Population: Participants responding to these are caregivers

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Alianza LatinaParticipant Suggestions of ImprovementResponded88 Participants
Alianza LatinaParticipant Suggestions of ImprovementMissing12 Participants
Primary

Participant Treatment Adherence

Metrics of the percentage of referred Latino dementia dyads who attend at least 50% of Health Navigator visits

Time frame: During the 6 months of the Navigator intervention period

Population: Participants responding to these are dyads (caregivers and, when possible, care recipients)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Alianza LatinaParticipant Treatment Adherence29 Percentage of dyads
Primary

Practitioner Adherence to Guideline Recommendations

10-item checklist administered to the dyads asking about the implementations of different aspects of dementia service guidelines

Time frame: 6 months after baseline

Population: 87 respondents

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Alianza LatinaPractitioner Adherence to Guideline Recommendations9 Guideline Items in the checklist covered
Primary

Provider Assessment Feasibility 1

Metrics of the percentage of providers who complete baseline and follow-up surveys about dementia knowledge, attitudes and skills

Time frame: During the 9 months of the provider intervention period

Population: Primary care providers that are part of Aim 2a

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Alianza LatinaProvider Assessment Feasibility 143 Participants
Primary

Provider Fidelity Feasibility 1

Percentage of providers able to implement screenings in regular workflow, measured via survey with the question To what extent were you able to implement screenings in regular workflow with three response options: not at all, to some degree, usually, almost always and always

Time frame: 9 months (end of the provider intervention period)

Population: Primary care providers that are part of Aim 2a

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Alianza LatinaProvider Fidelity Feasibility 1not at all1 Participants
Alianza LatinaProvider Fidelity Feasibility 1to some degree5 Participants
Alianza LatinaProvider Fidelity Feasibility 1usually19 Participants
Alianza LatinaProvider Fidelity Feasibility 1almost always9 Participants
Alianza LatinaProvider Fidelity Feasibility 1always8 Participants
Alianza LatinaProvider Fidelity Feasibility 1Missing17 Participants
Primary

Provider Fidelity Feasibility 2

Metrics of the Number of referrals to Health Navigator per month

Time frame: During the 9 months of the provider intervention period

Population: Primary care providers that are part of Aim 2a

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alianza LatinaProvider Fidelity Feasibility 25.77 Referrals per monthStandard Deviation 3.45
Primary

Provider Recruitment Feasibility

Metrics of the number of providers who agree to be trained per month

Time frame: During the 9 months of the provider intervention period

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alianza LatinaProvider Recruitment Feasibility1.44 Providers trained per monthStandard Deviation 2.74
Primary

Provider Retention Feasibility

Metrics of the percentage of providers who continue to partner with the study team by the end of the provider intervention period

Time frame: During the 9 months of the provider intervention period

Population: Primary care providers that are part of Aim 2a

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Alianza LatinaProvider Retention Feasibility11 Participants
Secondary

Caregivers' Burden

Short Zarit Burden Interview: This caregiver burden scale has 6 items that address the perceived impact of the act of providing care on the physical health, emotional health, social activities and financial situation of the caregiver. Each item has five response options ranging from never to nearly always. A total score is obtained by adding scores in all items, with a range from 0 to 24. Higher scores mean higher burden.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months from baseline

Population: Participants responding to these are caregivers on their behalf

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alianza LatinaCaregivers' Burden0.34 Change in units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.32
Secondary

Caregivers' Depression

10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale (CES-D-10): This is a 10-item, self-report rating scale that measures characteristic symptoms of depression in the past week (e.g. depression, loneliness, restless sleep). Each item is rated on a 4-point scale, from 0 (rarely or none of the time) to 3 (most or all of the time) with positively worded items (items 5 and 8) reverse scored. Items yield summary scores that range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher severity. An example of an item is: I was bothered by things that usually don't bother me

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months from baseline

Population: Participants responding to these are caregivers on their behalf

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alianza LatinaCaregivers' Depression-0.43 Change in units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.22
Secondary

Caregivers' Quality of Life

In general, how satisfied are you with your life? with a 4-point scale from 1 (Very Satisfied) to 4 (Very Dissatisfied)

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months from baseline

Population: Participants responding to these are caregivers on their behalf

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alianza LatinaCaregivers' Quality of Life0.14 Change in units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Secondary

Patients' Behavioral Symptoms

Brief version of the Neuropsychiatry Inventory Questionnaire: This is a validated clinical instrument for evaluating psychopathology in dementia. If any of the 12 neuropsychiatric symptoms is present, caregivers rate their loved one's severity on a three-point scale (mild-severe). For example, if the caregiver responds yes to is the patient resistive to help from others at times, or hard to handle?, the following question would follow: rate the severity of the symptom. An overall severity summary score is calculated by adding the severity scores of all items, ranging from 0 to 36, and higher scores mean higher severity.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months from baseline

Population: Participants responding to these are caregivers on behalf of care recipients

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alianza LatinaPatients' Behavioral Symptoms0.58 Change in units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.93
Secondary

Patients' Depression

Short Geriatric Depression Scale: This scale measures depressive symptomatology, and consists of 15 yes vs no questions. Of the 15 items, 10 indicate the presence of depression when answered positively, while the rest (question numbers 1, 5, 7, 11, 13) indicate depression when answered negatively. A summary score is obtained ranging from 0 to 15, with higher scores meaning more severe depressive symptomatology.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months from baseline

Population: Participants responding to these are caregivers on behalf of care recipients or care recipients themselves when possible

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alianza LatinaPatients' Depression-0.71 Change in units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.53
Secondary

Patients' Quality of Life

Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease: The Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease is comprised of 13 items (physical health, energy, mood, living situation, memory, family, marriage, friends, self as a whole, ability to do chores, ability to do things for fun, money and life as a whole). Response options include 1(poor), 2(fair), 3(good) and 4 (excellent), for a total score of 13-52, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months from baseline

Population: Participants responding to these are caregivers on behalf of care recipients or care recipients themselves when possible

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alianza LatinaPatients' Quality of Life0.42 Change in units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.07

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 30, 2026