Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Conditions
Keywords
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, physical therapy
Brief summary
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common of all entrapment syndromes with a prevalence of 1-5%. Electrodiagnostic testing is used to make a definite diagnosis. The mainstay of the pathophysiology of CTS includes mechanical damage to the median nerve due to build up of pressure in the carpal tunnel and nerve ischaemia. Physical therapy (PT) in particular is the conventional non-surgical treatment of choice in the management of mild to moderate CTS, resulting in pain reduction and improved function. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a non invasive treatment method in which high frequency sound waves are applied to the body. The mechanism of action of ESWT in the treatment of CTS remains largely unknown. Eventhough there are many therapeutic options in the treatment of mild to moderate CTS, there is no consensus on the most effective treatment (4). ESWT has become a desirable treatment option in recent years. However, due to small patients numbers in trials to date and a lack of placebo controlled studies, the efficacy of this treatment option is still under debate. This study aims to compare the efficacy of RESWT to the recommended conventional PT modalities, including therapeutic US, in the treatment of CTS with regards to nociceptive and neuropathic pain, functionality and nerve conduction study outcomes.
Detailed description
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common of all entrapment syndromes with a prevalence of 1-5%. CTS describes the compression of the median nerve as it travels through the carpal tunnel of the wrist, largely resulting in sensory symptoms of paraesthesia and pain in the areas of the hand innervated by the nerve. CTS can also lead to muscle atrophy, loss of motor function and disability of the hand. Electrodiagnostic testing is used to make a definite diagnosis. The mainstay of the pathophysiology of CTS includes mechanical damage to the median nerve due to build up of pressure in the carpal tunnel and nerve ischaemia. Chronic compression of the median nerve also results in neuronal depolarisation and the release of neuropeptides such as substance P and calcitonin-gene-related peptide. These neuropeptides stimulate the release of endothelial nitric oxide thus triggering vasodilatation and neurogenic inflammation . Management of CTS depends on disease severity. Physical therapy (PT) in particular is the conventional non-surgical treatment of choice in the management of mild to moderate CTS, resulting in pain reduction and improved function. Recommended PT modalities include laser, ultrasound and liquid paraffin therapy. US therapy in particular has given satisfactory results in the treatment of mild to moderate CTS. The biophysical effects of US have been shown to trigger nerve regeneration and healing. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a non invasive treatment method in which high frequency sound waves are applied to the body . ESWT can be divided into radial (RESWT) and focused (FESWT) based on the design of the reflector and resultant pressure and energy applied. Animal studies have shown that ESWT, and especially RESWT can be successfully used in the treatment of peripheral nerve lesions, improving nerve regeneration and functional activity . Human studies on its uses in the treatment of peripheral neuropathies such as interdigital neuroma, distally symmetric polyneuropathy and CTS have also given promising results . The mechanism of action of ESWT in the treatment of CTS remains largely unknown. However, it is believed that the antiinflammatory, angio- and neuro-genic, effects of ESWT encourages tissue regeneration in CTS thus reducing the patient's symptoms and promoting an improvement in function. Moreover, RESWT rather than FESWT maybe the better therapeutic option in CTS as it can be applied to a wider area, incorporating both the median nerve and surrounding tissues. Eventhough there are many therapeutic options in the treatment of mild to moderate CTS, there is no consensus on the most effective treatment. ESWT has become a desirable treatment option in recent years. However, due to small patients numbers in trials to date and a lack of placebo controlled studies, the efficacy of this treatment option is still under debate. This study aims to compare the efficacy of RESWT to the recommended conventional PT modalities, including therapeutic US, in the treatment of CTS with regards to nociceptive and neuropathic pain, functionality and nerve conduction study outcomes.
Interventions
DEVICEsplint and home exercise
Each patient will be given a home exercise program of wrist range of motion, wrist stretch, wrist isometric strengthening and median nerve glide exercises to be performed daily for the duration of the study
DEVICERESWT
RESWT at a pressure of 4 bars, a frequency of 5Hz and 2000 hits in total will be applied 2cm proximal to the median nerve, with the probe directed towards the palm, diffusely over the pisiform.
DEVICEphysical therapy
20 minutes of liquid paraffin treatment of the hand, 1.5watt/cm2 therapeutic ultrasound applied to the volar surface of the wrist for 5 minutes and 20 minutes of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on five consecutive days of the week for a total of fifteen sessions over 3 weeks
Sponsors
Erzurum Regional Training & Research Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
All pre and post study evaluations will be performed by a single physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist blind to the patients' treatment groups. Patients will be randomised into the groups by a second physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist. PT wil be conducted by a single experienced physiotherapist. All data analysis will be conducted by a PMR specialist blind to the treatment provided.
Intervention model description
This study aims to compare the efficacy of RESWT to the recommended conventional PT modalities, including therapeutic US, in the treatment of CTS with regards to nociceptive and neuropathic pain, functionality and nerve conduction study outcomes.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Patients have symptoms of CTS for more than three months with physical examination and electrophysiological findings consistent with mild to moderate CTS
Exclusion criteria
1. Presence of other sensory or motor neuropathies 2. History of surgery, trauma or fracture of the index hand and wrist 3. History of corticosteroid injection or PT of the index wrist within the past three months.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire (BCTQ) | Change from Baseline BCTQ at 3 weeks post-treatment | This questionnaire determines symptom severity (BCTQs) and functional outcome (BCTQf) specific to CTS using a scale for each. BCTQs is determined using 11 questions each with 5 answers to choose from scored from 1 to 5 giving a BCTQs total out of 55. The higher the score the greater the symptom severity. BCTQf questions the difficulty of 8 functional activities scored from 1 to 5 giving a BCTQf total out of 40. The higher the score the worse the functional capacity |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Visual analogue scale (VAS) | Change from Baseline VAS at 3 weeks post-treatment | The VAS provides a subjective, visual linear pain score from 0-10cm scored by the patient where 0cm is no pain (0cm is no pain and 10cm the worst pain imaginable) |
| Leeds Assesment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) | Change from Baseline LANSS at 3 weeks post-treatment | LANSS is a bedside test used to differentiate between nociceptive and neuropathic pain. The first part of the LANSS consists of five questions on neuropathic pain (maximum score of 16). The second part is a physical examination performed by the physician to elicit neuropathic pain. A final test score of 12 and above signifies neuropathic pain, a score below 12 signifies nociceptive pain with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 87% |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed