Skip to content

Radiofrequency-assisted Liver Resection in Intractable Liver Cancer

The Application of Radiofrequency-assisted Liver Resection in Intractable Liver Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04413526
Enrollment
199
Registered
2020-06-04
Start date
2020-05-25
Completion date
2021-11-18
Last updated
2021-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Cancer

Keywords

RFA, liver cancer, surgical resection

Brief summary

In this retrospective study, the investigators assessed the application of radiofrequency-assisted liver resection in intractable liver cancer resection, and plan to analysis the different factors.

Detailed description

The primary clinical treatment of liver cancer is surgical resection, although many integrated applications develop rapidly, surgery is still the best way to remove the tumour lesion. Traditional ways that have curative removed tumours in three methods, which are liver resection, liver transplantation and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). As for primary liver cancer, surgery, and RFA are both effective and safety, but for the complexity of end-stage liver cancer, surgical resection may not remove the tumours alone. Surgical resection with radiofrequency ablation therapy for intractable liver cancer is a kind of active plan. The therapy can eliminate the tumour, maximize the protection of patient liver tissue, reduce operation damage, reduce the incidence of complications, and improve patients quality of life after surgery.

Interventions

PROCEDUREradiofrequency

radiofrequency combined with liver resection

PROCEDURETACE

only TACE treatment

PROCEDURETACE+radiofrequency

TACE followed by radiofrequency

Sponsors

Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration pathology or postoperative pathology was confirmed to be liver cancer, no pathological results according to China 's 2017 version of the hepatocarcinoma (HCC) diagnosis and treatment specifications, in line with the standard clinical diagnosis of liver cancer * According to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging criteria, it is stage C (stage C: single tumour\> 5 cm or more than three tumours, and at least one tumour\> 3 cm, liver function Child-Pugh A or B, with lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis or portal vein or Venous liver trunk is invaded, penance Status (PST) score 1-2 points)

Exclusion criteria

* HCC patients with other malignant tumours * Metastatic liver tumour * Patients with liver abscess * Patients with organ dysfunction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The survival rates for one-year to five-year5 yearsThe survival rates was defined as the percentage of liver cancer for five years.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The hospital stay3 monthsThe length of stay in a hospital regarding days
The Child-Pugh score after therapy3 monthsThe Child-Pugh is based on the presence and severity of ascites and hepatic encephalopathy, the prolongation of prothrombin time, and the levels of serum bilirubin and albumin. According to the Child-Pugh scores, patients are classified into three classes (Child class A, B, and C with CP scores 5-6, 7-9, and 10-15, respectively)

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026