Skip to content

Use of Traditional Curved Iris Scissors or the Wuennenberg Modified Curved Iris Scissors for Skin Surgery

Do Patients Undergoing Dermatologic Surgery Prefer the Use of Traditional Curved Iris Scissors or the Wuennenberg Modified Curved Iris Scissors?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04413383
Acronym
TISMIS
Enrollment
147
Registered
2020-06-02
Start date
2020-12-21
Completion date
2021-07-14
Last updated
2021-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin Cancer

Brief summary

Every year thousands of dermatologic surgery procedures are performed at the University of Missouri Department of Dermatology, including Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS), Excisions, and biopsies. Surgery is known to cause anxiety for patients and with these procedures performed under local anesthetic on awake patients', the sights, sounds, and smells experienced during the procedure can lead to an increase in their anxiety or affect their overall perception of the experience. From performing and assisting with dermatologic surgery the noise associated with the use of the traditional curved Iris scissors provokes an increase in patient awareness to the procedure resulting in increased anxiety, triggering of the vasovagal response, and expressions of annoyance by the patient. However, the modified curved Iris scissors make almost no noise. The Investigators hypothesize that if patients were given the comparative experience of both types of curved Iris scissors during dermatologic surgery, then they will choose the modified curved Iris scissors because the lack of noise will be perceived as more pleasant experience. Our objective is to perform a prospective, single blinded, randomized controlled trial to determine how the noise of traditional curved Iris scissors vs the silent Wuennenberg modified curved Iris scissors affects patients during dermatologic surgery.

Interventions

OTHERTraditional Curved Iris Scissors

Aesculap Curved Iris Scissors

OTHERWuennenberg Modified Curved Iris Scissors

Modified Silent Curved Iris Scissors

OTHERComparative Experience of Traditional and Wuennenberg Modified Curved Iris Scissors

Patients experience both types of scissors

Sponsors

University of Missouri-Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult (18 years or older) * non-pregnant * patients being treated with Mohs micrographic surgery or excision on the head and neck

Exclusion criteria

* Patients not meeting above inclusion criteria will be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Extent that patient notices curved Iris scissors3 to 8 hours (length of the patients Mohs Surgery)Questionnaire with an ordinal scale from 1 to 10 to assess the extent that patient notices the use of the curved iris scissors.
Extent that patient is bothered by the curved Iris scissors3 to 8 hours (length of the patients Mohs Surgery)Questionnaire with an ordinal scale from 1 to 10 to assess the extent that patient is bothered by the curved iris scissors.
Patients Preference of curved Iris scissor3 to 8 hours (length of the patients Mohs Surgery)Patient is asked during the procedure if they prefer 1, surgeon uses the traditional curved Iris scissors, or 2 and the surgeon uses the Wuennenberg modified curved Iris scissors. The patient indicates their preference by responding 1 or 2. After the procedure the patient completes a questionnaire with an ordinal scale from 1 to 10 to assess the extent that patient notices and is bothered by the curved iris scissors.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026