Skip to content

Domiciliary Versus Hospital Management of PPROM

Planned Domiciliary Versus Hospital Care for Women With Preterm Prelabor Rupture of the Membranes (PPROM)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04413019
Acronym
PPROM
Enrollment
3662
Registered
2020-06-02
Start date
2019-04-15
Completion date
2020-10-20
Last updated
2021-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Preterm Premature Rupture of Membrane

Brief summary

This study is designed to compare efficacy & safety of planned domiciliary versus hospital care for women with preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes (PPROM) on fetal, neonatal and maternal outcome.

Detailed description

Background: PPROM is encountered in 2.0% to 3.5% of pregnancies. Domiciliary care management is developing more and more in obstetrics, with psychological benefits for patients as well as other financial benefits. Reliable discharge criteria have been mentioned by few studies for patients with PPROM. Studies had shown that domiciliary care management in a context of PPROM did not modify perinatal morbidity and mortality, and allows a prolongation of the latency period. However, eligibility criteria for domiciliary care management were heterogeneous Aim of The Work: The aim of this study is to compare efficacy & safety of planned domiciliary versus hospital care for women with preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes (PPROM) on fetal, neonatal and maternal outcome. Patients & Methods: The current trial was conducted at Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital. A total of 3662 pregnant women were recruited from the outpatient clinic & emergency room and included in the study. Then, they were randomized into two groups; group (D) was counseled for home care management, while group (H) was hospitalized. Take-home baby was assessed as a primary outcome and other maternal, fetal & neonatal complications were recorded & moreover latency period, mode of delivery & preference of care were assessed

Interventions

Patients recruited in this study commenced antibiotic treatment according to the recent guidelines : * Erythromycin 250 mg 4 times daily for 10 days following the diagnosis of PPROM, or until the women is established labor (whichever sooner) * Penicillin may be used in patients who can't tolerate erythromycin * In cases of penicillin allergy: Cefazolin 1 g intravenously every 8 hours for 48 hours, followed by cephalexin 500 mg orally four times daily for five days. These drugs provide coverage for both GBS and Escherichia coli, the two major causes of neonatal infection.

Sponsors

Ahmed Mohammed Selim
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

include women with PPROM ≥28 weeks & \<37 weeks with no signs of intra-amniotic infection & membranes rupture is confirmed by a sterile speculum examination and decrease amniotic fluid on ultrasound with singleton, viable, cephalic presenting fetus, morphologically normal fetus by ultrasound & reactive fetal heart rate tracing with no evidence of meconium-stained liquor

Exclusion criteria

* Query PPROM: A history of PPROM with no pooling of amniotic fluid from the cervix on a sterile speculum examination * Maternal comorbidities (Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, etc.) * Patients with placenta previa * Amniotic fluid pocket on ultrasound \< 2x2 cm * Logistic problems interfering with follow-up * Inability to check temperature every six hours, with parameters for notifying their clinician (temperature ≥38°C) * Non-Dependable transportation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Take-home baby2 yearsthis outcome is the best indicator of success of the management plan when the outcome is alive & well baby

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026