Skip to content

PPA Tele-Savvy: A Pilot Study of an Online Intervention for Caregivers of Persons Living With PPA

Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) Tele-Savvy: A Pilot Study of an Online Intervention for Caregivers of Persons Living With PPA

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04412083
Enrollment
29
Registered
2020-06-02
Start date
2020-07-30
Completion date
2023-09-19
Last updated
2024-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Caregiver Burnout, Primary Progressive Aphasia

Brief summary

The primary goal of this pilot project is to adapt an evidence-informed on-line psychoeducation program (Tele-Savvy) to address the unique challenges facing informal caregivers of those living with PPA and geared toward achieving caregiver mastery in this population.

Detailed description

The primary goal of this pilot project is to develop an evidence-informed on-line psychoeducation program (Tele-Savvy) based on the well-established Savvy Caregiver program to address the unique challenges facing informal caregivers of those living with Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) and to help these caregivers achieve mastery. Key elements of the adaptation process are to identify and adapt mechanistic elements of the Tele-Savvy intervention (increasing self-efficacy, mastery of new skills, increased knowledge of disease-specific symptoms and trajectories, problem-solving skills). We will engage PPA caregivers in the process of adapting the existing Tele-Savvy program to fit their needs and then pilot test the adapted PPA Tele-Savvy program.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPPA Tele-Savvy Pilot Intervention

We will engage PPA caregivers in the process of adapting the existing Tele-Savvy program to fit their needs and then pilot test the adapted PPA Tele-Savvy program.

Sponsors

Emory University
CollaboratorOTHER
Northwestern University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Aim 1: Informal (family or friends) caregivers of persons living with or deceased from PPA. Age 18 or over Providing or have provided at least 2 hours per day of unpaid assistance, on average, for a person in the early-middle stage of PPA. Must have access to a computer with adequate internet connection. Able to use a videoconferencing platform and receive email. Participants must be able to read, speak and understand English and have no uncorrectable vision or hearing deficits that might impede participation. Aim 2: Informal (family or friends) caregivers of persons living with PPA. Age 18 or over Providing at least 2 hours per day of unpaid assistance, on average, for a person in the early-middle stage of PPA. Must have access to a computer with adequate internet connection. Able to use a videoconferencing platform and receive email. Must be able to read, speak and understand English and have no uncorrectable vision or hearing deficits that might impede participation.

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Caregiver Mastery Pearlin Caregiver Stress Scale ScoreBaseline, 6-week follow-upComprised of 6 domains from the full Pearlin Stress Scale. 1. Relational Deprivation: 6-24, higher scores indicate increased relational deprivation. 2. Role Captivity: 3 - 12, higher scores indicate an increased feeling of being trapped in the caregiver role. 3. Loss of Self: 2 - 8, higher scores indicate a greater loss of self. 4. Caregiving competence: 4 - 16, higher scores indicate greater caregiving competence. 5. Management of Situation: 4 - 16, higher scores indicate better management of the caregiving situation. 6. Management of Meaning: 9 - 36, higher scores indicate a better management of the meaning of the caregiving role.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Caregiver Burden The Zarit Burden Interview scoreBaseline, 6-week follow-upThe interview was developed to measure subjective burden among caregivers of adults with dementia. The 22-item self-report inventory examines burden associated with functional/behavioral impairments and the home care situation. The items are worded subjectively, focusing on the affective response of the caregiver. Scores range 0 - 88. Lower scores indicate little to no burden. Higher scores indicate greater burden. A score of 17 or more is considered high burden.
Change in Caregiver Stress Perceived Stress Survey scoreBaseline, 6-week follow-upThis questionnaire is comprised of 10 items from the Perceived Stress Scale. Scores range 0 - 40. Higher scores indicating higher perceived stress. A score of 0-13 would be considered low stress. Scores from 14-26 would be considered moderate stress. Scores from 27-40 indicate high perceived stress.
Change in Caregiver Depression Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)Baseline, 6-week follow-upA 20-item scale that represents a symptom cluster consisting of negative affect, positive affect, interpersonal problems, and somatic activity based on feelings over the past week.Scores range 0 - 60. A score of 0-16 indicates little to no symptomatology, a score of 16 or more indicates depression with higher scores indicating increased severity.
Change in Care recipient quality of life DEMQOL: Dementia Quality of Life Measure (Carer v4) scoreBaseline, 6-week follow-upThis 32 item questionnaire will be used to assess mood, cognitive status, and overall quality of life of the care recipient. Scores range 31 - 124. Lower scores indicate no subjective concerns about cognition or general health, while higher scores indicate a greater subjective concern about cognition and general health.
Change in Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) scoreBaseline, 6-week follow-upThis 24 item instrument measures the frequency of the care recipient's problem behaviors in the following domains: disruptive behavior (wandering, aggression), memory-related behavior (repeating questions and stories), and depression. Scores range 0 - 96 for frequency. Lower scores indicate little to no behavioral problems while higher scores indicate greater behavioral issues. Scores range 0 - 96 for reaction. Lower scores indicate little concern regarding the behavior on the part of the caregiver while higher scores indicate greater concern.
Change in Positive Aspects of Caregiving (PCOS) Scale scoreBaseline, 6-week follow-upCaregivers will be instructed that In spite of all the difficulties involved in giving care to a family member with memory or health problems, good things can come out of caregiving experiences. The scale has 11 items, and overall scores range 0 - 44. Higher scores indicate a more positive view of the caregiving role while lower scores indicate less positive views of the caregiver role.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026