Skip to content

Nonrelapsing Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (NRSPMS) Study of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor Tolebrutinib (SAR442168) (HERCULES)

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Efficacy and Safety Study Comparing SAR442168 to Placebo in Participants With Nonrelapsing Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04411641
Acronym
HERCULES
Enrollment
1131
Registered
2020-06-02
Start date
2020-09-24
Completion date
2024-08-29
Last updated
2025-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-relapsing Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Brief summary

Primary Objective: To determine the efficacy of SAR442168 compared to placebo in delaying disability progression in NRSPMS Secondary Objective: To evaluate efficacy of SAR442168 compared to placebo on clinical endpoints, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions, cognitive performance, physical function, and quality of life To evaluate safety and tolerability of SAR442168 To evaluate population pharmacokinetics (PK) of SAR442168 and relevant metabolites in NRSPMS and its relationship to efficacy and safety To evaluate pharmacodynamics (PD) of SAR442168

Detailed description

This was an event-driven (6-month CDP) trial with a variable treatment duration (end-of-study \[EOS\] duration: up to approximately 47months). Participants with 6-month confirmed disability progression (CDP) had an option to receive tolebrutinib in the open-label (OL).

Interventions

Pharmaceutical form: Film-coated tablet Route of administration: Oral

Pharmaceutical form: Film-coated tablet Route of administration: Oral

Sponsors

Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: * 18 to 60 years of age inclusive * Diagnosis of nonrelapsing secondary progressive multiple sclerosis according to the 2017 McDonald criteria * Expanded disability status scale (EDSS) between 3.0 to 6.5 points inclusive, at screening * The participant must have documented evidence of disability progression observed during the 12 months before screening * Absence of clinical relapses for at least 24 months * Contraceptive use by men or women should be consistent with local regulations regarding the methods of contraception for those participating in clinical studies * A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and at least one of the following conditions applies: * Is not a WOCBP OR * Is a WOCBP and agrees to use an acceptable contraceptive method

Exclusion criteria

* The participant has conditions that would adversely affect study participation such as short life expectancy. * Evidence of infection with human immuodeficiency virus (HIV), transplantation, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), active hepatitis B or C, active or latent tuberculosis or other active infections that would adversely affect study participation. * Persistent chronic or active or recurring system infection, that may adversely affect participation or IMP administration in this study, as judged by the Investigator. * History of malignancy within 5 years prior to screening. * History of alcohol or drug abuse within 1 year prior to screening. * Hospitalized for psychiatric disease within 2 years prior to screening. * Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities (including evidence of liver injury) or electrocardiogram abnormalities at screening * Bleeding disorder, known platelet dysfunctionat any time prior to the screening visit * A platelet count \<150 000/μL at the screening visit * A history of significant bleeding event within 6 months prior to screening, according to the Investigator's judgment such as, but not limited to cerebral or gastrointestinal bleeding. * Lymphocyte count below the lower limit of normal at screening. * Recent live (attenuated) vaccine within 2 months before the first treatment visit. * Recent major surgery (within 4 weeks of screening) or planned major surgery during the study. * The participant has received medications/treatments for MS within a specified time frame. * Receiving potent and moderate inducers or inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) or potent inhibitors of CYP2C8 hepatic enzymes. * Receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy (such as aspirin\>81mg/day, clopidogrel, warfarin). * Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Onset of 6-Month Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)Baseline (Day 1) up to approximately 47 monthsThe EDSS is a disability scale that assesses the following 7 functional domains: visual, brainstem, pyramidal \[motor\], cerebellar \[coordination\], sensory, cerebral, and bowel/bladder. The total EDSS ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis \[MS\]) (0.5 increments from 1-10; next increase after 0 is 1). Higher scores indicated increased disability. Time to onset of 6-month CDP was defined as the time from randomization to the onset of a sustained increase from baseline in EDSS score of \>=1.0 point from the baseline EDSS score when the baseline score was \<=5.0 or of \>=0.5 points when the baseline EDSS score was \>5.0 confirmed after a minimum 6-month interval.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Number of New and/or Enlarging T2-hyperintense Lesions Per YearBaseline (Day 1) up to approximately 47 monthsMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain was performed to identify number of new and/or enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions defined as the sum of the individual number of new and/or enlarging T2 lesions from baseline up to and including the EOS visit.
Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in the 9-hole Peg Test (HPT) for at Least 3 MonthsBaseline (Day 1) up to approximately 47 monthsThe 9-HPT is a brief, standardized, quantitative test of upper extremity function and the time to complete the 9-HPT is used to assess a participant's manual dexterity and fine motor skills. A participant was asked to place the pegs into the holes and remove them with the dominant and non-dominant hand; two successful trials for each hand. The amount of time (in seconds) required to place and remove all nine pegs was recorded for each trial (ranging from 10 to 300 seconds). The mean time to test completion served for assessment of the participant's hand dexterity. Higher value indicated worse outcome. An increase of \>20% from the baseline in the 9-HPT was considered meaningful worsening; time to onset of sustained 20% increase for at least 3 months is presented.
Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in the Timed 25-foot Walk (T25-FW) for at Least 3 MonthsBaseline (Day 1) up to approximately 47 monthsThe T25-FW test is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test used to assess a participant's walking ability. A participant was directed to one end of a clearly marked 25-foot course and instructed to walk 25 feet as quickly as safely possible for 2 trials. The amount of time (in seconds) to walk 25 feet was recorded (ranging from 2.2 to 180 seconds). The mean walk time was used for assessment of the participant's walking ability. Higher value indicated worse outcome. An increase of \>20% from the baseline in the T25-FW test was considered meaningful worsening; time to onset of sustained 20% increase for at least 3 months is presented.
Time to Onset of 6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status ScaleBaseline (Day 1) up to approximately 47 monthsThe EDSS is a disability scale that assesses the following 7 functional domains: visual, brainstem, pyramidal \[motor\], cerebellar \[coordination\], sensory, cerebral, and bowel/bladder. The total EDSS ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) (0.5 increments from 1-10; next increase after 0 is 1). Higher scores indicated increased disability. CDI was defined as a \>=1 point decrease in the EDSS score from baseline confirmed over at least 6 months.
Percent Change in Brain Volume at EOS Compared to Month 6Month 6 to EOS (up to approximately 47 months)MRI of the brain was performed to evaluate percent change in brain volume which is considered as a marker of the central nervous system degenerative process. Least squares (LS) mean is presented.
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) at EOSBaseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 47 months)The SDMT is used to assess processing speed, divided attention, visual scanning, tracking and motor speed. It involves a simple substitution task using a reference key. The number of correct substitutions and number of items completed within a 90 second interval (maximum 110 seconds) are recorded. A decrease of 4 points from baseline on the SDMT is considered meaningful worsening. The score was the number of correctly coded items from 0-110 in 90 seconds; higher scores indicated better outcome. LS mean is presented. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study intervention.
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by California Verbal Learning Test Second Edition (CVLT-II) at EOSBaseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 47 months)The CVLT-II is a verbal learning and memory test consisting of recall and recognition of a list of 16 words. The list was read by the examiner, participants listened to the list and reported as many of the items as possible. For each assessment, 5 trials were completed. Standardized scores were used for analysis. The maximum possible score was 80 and a minimum was 0. A higher score indicated better recall meaning improved cognitive function. LS mean is presented. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study intervention.
Time to Onset of 3-month Confirmed Disability Progression as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status ScaleBaseline (Day 1) up to approximately 47 monthsThe EDSS is a disability scale that assesses the following 7 functional domains: visual, brainstem, pyramidal \[motor\], cerebellar \[coordination\], sensory, cerebral, and bowel/bladder. The total EDSS ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) (0.5 increments from 1-10; next increase after 0 is 1). Higher scores indicated increased disability. Time to onset of 3-month CDP was defined as the time from randomization to the onset of a sustained increase from baseline in EDSS score (of \>=1.0 point from the baseline EDSS score when the baseline score is \<=5.0, of \>=0.5 points when the baseline EDSS score is \>5.0) confirmed after a minimum 3-month interval. The confirmation of 3-month CDP followed the same criteria as that of 6-month CDP.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-emergent Serious AEs, Treatment-emergent AEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to end of follow-up, up to approximately 47 monthsAn AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event. An AESI was an AE (serious or nonserious) of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the Investigator to the Sponsor was required. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TE period.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Tolebrutinib and M2 Metabolite30-90 minutes post-dose at Months 6, 9, and 12 and 2.5-5 hours post-dose at Months 6 and 12Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess Cmax of tolebrutinib and M2 metabolite using a population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) model.
Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Tolebrutinib and M2 Metabolite30-90 minutes post-dose at Months 6, 9, and 12 and 2.5-5 hours post-dose at Months 6 and 12Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess Tmax of tolebrutinib and M2 metabolite using a PopPK model.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over the Last 24-hours Dosing Interval (AUC0-24) of Tolebrutinib and M2 Metabolite30-90 minutes post-dose at Months 6, 9, and 12 and 2.5-5 hours post-dose at Months 6 and 12Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess AUC0-24 of tolebrutinib and M2 metabolite using a PopPK model.
Change From Baseline in Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) and Serum Chitinase-3 Like Protein-1 (Chi3L1) Levels at EOSBaseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 47 months)Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess change from baseline in NfL and Chi3L1. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study intervention.
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD)19+ B Cells at EOSBaseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 47 months)Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess change from baseline in CD19+ B cells. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study intervention.
Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels at EOSBaseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 47 months)Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess change from baseline in IgG and IgM levels. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study intervention.
Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MSQoL-54) Questionnaire Score at EOSBaseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 47 months)MSQoL-54 is standardized instrument with generic and MS-specific items which generates 12 subscales & 2 single-item measures (satisfaction with sexual function \[1 item\] & change in health \[1 item\].12 subscales are as follows:a:physical health (10 items),b:health perceptions (5 items), c:energy (5 items),d:role limitation physical (4 items),e:sexual function (4 items),f:pain (3 items),g:social function (3 items),h:health distress (4 items),i:overall quality of life (2 items),j:emotional well-being (5 items),k:role limitations emotional (3 items) and l:cognitive function (4 items).Physical health composite score was calculated as weighted sum of 'a to h' subscales and mental health composite score was calculated as weighted sum of 'i to l' subscales mentioned above.Each composite score was transformed linearly to common 0 (worst) to 100 (best) score range;LS mean is presented.Higher score indicated improved QoL.Baseline:last available value prior to first dose of study intervention.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 1438 participants were screened at 267 centers in 31 countries between 24-Sep-2020 and 02-Dec-2022, of which 307 were screen failures mainly due to not meeting eligibility criteria.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 1131 participants were randomized in this study in a 2:1 ratio to receive either tolebrutinib or matching placebo in the double-blind (DB) period. Participants with 6-month confirmed disability progression (CDP) were given the option to receive open-label (OL) tolebrutinib. This was an event-driven (6-month CDP) trial with a variable treatment duration (end-of-study \[EOS\] duration: up to approximately 47 months).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
DB: Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to tolebrutinib orally once daily up to approximately 47 months.
377
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mg
Participants received tolebrutinib 60 mg tablet orally once daily up to approximately 47 months.
754
Total1,131

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
DB PeriodAdverse Event132900
DB PeriodLack of Efficacy191900
DB PeriodOther72700
DB PeriodPoor compliance to protocol1500
DB PeriodProgressive disease7611600
DB PeriodRandomized and not treated2200
DB PeriodWithdrawal by Subject6712200
OLAdverse Event0010
OLOther0006
OLPoor compliance to protocol0010
OLProgressive disease0012
OLWithdrawal by Subject00617

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgTotalDB: Placebo
Age, Continuous48.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
48.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
48.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
36 Participants55 Participants19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants10 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants13 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
703 Participants1051 Participants348 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
454 Participants696 Participants242 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
300 Participants435 Participants135 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 3772 / 7540 / 760 / 120
other
Total, other adverse events
182 / 375368 / 75225 / 7641 / 120
serious
Total, serious adverse events
39 / 375113 / 7529 / 7611 / 120

Outcome results

Primary

Time to Onset of 6-Month Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)

The EDSS is a disability scale that assesses the following 7 functional domains: visual, brainstem, pyramidal \[motor\], cerebellar \[coordination\], sensory, cerebral, and bowel/bladder. The total EDSS ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis \[MS\]) (0.5 increments from 1-10; next increase after 0 is 1). Higher scores indicated increased disability. Time to onset of 6-month CDP was defined as the time from randomization to the onset of a sustained increase from baseline in EDSS score of \>=1.0 point from the baseline EDSS score when the baseline score was \<=5.0 or of \>=0.5 points when the baseline EDSS score was \>5.0 confirmed after a minimum 6-month interval.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to approximately 47 months

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants according to the intervention group allocated by the randomization, irrespective of the study intervention received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
DB: PlaceboTime to Onset of 6-Month Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)11.97 months
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgTime to Onset of 6-Month Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)12.04 months
Comparison: Derived using Cox proportional-hazards model with robust variance estimation.Covariates were treatment group,age at screening (\>40,\<=40 years),geographic region (United States \[US\], non-US),baseline EDSS score \& baseline gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing T1 lesions (presence, absence).In this analysis, for participants who completed study with 3-month confirmation and continued to meet disability progression criteria throughout EOS, their 6-month CDP status was imputed via multiple imputation method.p-value: 0.002695% CI: [0.546, 0.88]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over the Last 24-hours Dosing Interval (AUC0-24) of Tolebrutinib and M2 Metabolite

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess AUC0-24 of tolebrutinib and M2 metabolite using a PopPK model.

Time frame: 30-90 minutes post-dose at Months 6, 9, and 12 and 2.5-5 hours post-dose at Months 6 and 12

Population: The PK population included all participants in the safety population with at least 1 non-missing PK sample after first dose of the study intervention. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DB: PlaceboArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over the Last 24-hours Dosing Interval (AUC0-24) of Tolebrutinib and M2 MetaboliteTolebrutinib29.6 ng*h/mLStandard Deviation 17.8
DB: PlaceboArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over the Last 24-hours Dosing Interval (AUC0-24) of Tolebrutinib and M2 MetaboliteM2 Metabolite84.6 ng*h/mLStandard Deviation 53.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD)19+ B Cells at EOS

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess change from baseline in CD19+ B cells. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study intervention.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 47 months)

Population: The safety population included all randomized participants exposed to study intervention, regardless of the amount of exposure, analyzed according to the intervention actually received. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
DB: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD)19+ B Cells at EOS10.000 cells/microliter
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD)19+ B Cells at EOS-63.000 cells/microliter
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by California Verbal Learning Test Second Edition (CVLT-II) at EOS

The CVLT-II is a verbal learning and memory test consisting of recall and recognition of a list of 16 words. The list was read by the examiner, participants listened to the list and reported as many of the items as possible. For each assessment, 5 trials were completed. Standardized scores were used for analysis. The maximum possible score was 80 and a minimum was 0. A higher score indicated better recall meaning improved cognitive function. LS mean is presented. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study intervention.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 47 months)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants according to the intervention group allocated by the randomization, irrespective of the study intervention received. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
DB: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by California Verbal Learning Test Second Edition (CVLT-II) at EOS13.448 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9571
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by California Verbal Learning Test Second Edition (CVLT-II) at EOS14.169 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.6759
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) at EOS

The SDMT is used to assess processing speed, divided attention, visual scanning, tracking and motor speed. It involves a simple substitution task using a reference key. The number of correct substitutions and number of items completed within a 90 second interval (maximum 110 seconds) are recorded. A decrease of 4 points from baseline on the SDMT is considered meaningful worsening. The score was the number of correctly coded items from 0-110 in 90 seconds; higher scores indicated better outcome. LS mean is presented. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study intervention.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 47 months)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants according to the intervention group allocated by the randomization, irrespective of the study intervention received. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
DB: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) at EOS0.171 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.0373
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) at EOS0.136 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.0264
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MSQoL-54) Questionnaire Score at EOS

MSQoL-54 is standardized instrument with generic and MS-specific items which generates 12 subscales & 2 single-item measures (satisfaction with sexual function \[1 item\] & change in health \[1 item\].12 subscales are as follows:a:physical health (10 items),b:health perceptions (5 items), c:energy (5 items),d:role limitation physical (4 items),e:sexual function (4 items),f:pain (3 items),g:social function (3 items),h:health distress (4 items),i:overall quality of life (2 items),j:emotional well-being (5 items),k:role limitations emotional (3 items) and l:cognitive function (4 items).Physical health composite score was calculated as weighted sum of 'a to h' subscales and mental health composite score was calculated as weighted sum of 'i to l' subscales mentioned above.Each composite score was transformed linearly to common 0 (worst) to 100 (best) score range;LS mean is presented.Higher score indicated improved QoL.Baseline:last available value prior to first dose of study intervention.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 47 months)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants according to the intervention group allocated by the randomization, irrespective of the study intervention received. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
DB: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MSQoL-54) Questionnaire Score at EOSPhysical health composite score-3.979 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.8032
DB: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MSQoL-54) Questionnaire Score at EOSMental health composite score-4.648 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9964
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgChange From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MSQoL-54) Questionnaire Score at EOSPhysical health composite score-3.455 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.5623
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgChange From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MSQoL-54) Questionnaire Score at EOSMental health composite score-3.944 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.6959
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) and Serum Chitinase-3 Like Protein-1 (Chi3L1) Levels at EOS

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess change from baseline in NfL and Chi3L1. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study intervention.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 47 months)

Population: The safety population included all randomized participants exposed to study intervention, regardless of the amount of exposure, analyzed according to the intervention actually received. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DB: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) and Serum Chitinase-3 Like Protein-1 (Chi3L1) Levels at EOSNfL1.070 picogram/mL
DB: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) and Serum Chitinase-3 Like Protein-1 (Chi3L1) Levels at EOSChi3L15156.900 picogram/mL
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgChange From Baseline in Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) and Serum Chitinase-3 Like Protein-1 (Chi3L1) Levels at EOSNfL1.900 picogram/mL
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgChange From Baseline in Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) and Serum Chitinase-3 Like Protein-1 (Chi3L1) Levels at EOSChi3L13132.250 picogram/mL
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels at EOS

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess change from baseline in IgG and IgM levels. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study intervention.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 47 months)

Population: The safety population included all randomized participants exposed to study intervention, regardless of the amount of exposure, analyzed according to the intervention actually received. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DB: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels at EOSIgG0.350 gram/liter
DB: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels at EOSIgM0.050 gram/liter
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgChange From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels at EOSIgG-0.085 gram/liter
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgChange From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels at EOSIgM-0.240 gram/liter
Secondary

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Tolebrutinib and M2 Metabolite

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess Cmax of tolebrutinib and M2 metabolite using a population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) model.

Time frame: 30-90 minutes post-dose at Months 6, 9, and 12 and 2.5-5 hours post-dose at Months 6 and 12

Population: The PK population included all participants in the safety population with at least 1 non-missing PK sample after first dose of the study intervention. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DB: PlaceboMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Tolebrutinib and M2 MetaboliteTolebrutinib9.94 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 6.18
DB: PlaceboMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Tolebrutinib and M2 MetaboliteM2 Metabolite27.5 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 17.3
Secondary

Mean Number of New and/or Enlarging T2-hyperintense Lesions Per Year

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain was performed to identify number of new and/or enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions defined as the sum of the individual number of new and/or enlarging T2 lesions from baseline up to and including the EOS visit.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to approximately 47 months

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants according to the intervention group allocated by the randomization, irrespective of the study intervention received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
DB: PlaceboMean Number of New and/or Enlarging T2-hyperintense Lesions Per Year2.948 number of T2 lesions
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgMean Number of New and/or Enlarging T2-hyperintense Lesions Per Year1.835 number of T2 lesions
Comparison: Derived using negative binomial model with the number of new and/or enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions between randomization date and EOS date as the response variable, treatment group, age at screening (\>40, \<=40 years), geographic region (US, non-US), baseline EDSS score, and baseline number of T2 lesions as covariates, and log transformed observation duration as the offset variable.p-value: 0.01195% CI: [0.432, 0.897]Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-emergent Serious AEs, Treatment-emergent AEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event. An AESI was an AE (serious or nonserious) of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the Investigator to the Sponsor was required. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TE period.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to end of follow-up, up to approximately 47 months

Population: The safety population included all randomized participants exposed to study intervention, regardless of the amount of exposure, analyzed according to the intervention actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DB: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-emergent Serious AEs, Treatment-emergent AEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TEAEs293 Participants
DB: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-emergent Serious AEs, Treatment-emergent AEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TESAEs39 Participants
DB: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-emergent Serious AEs, Treatment-emergent AEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TEAEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation11 Participants
DB: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-emergent Serious AEs, Treatment-emergent AEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TEAESIs20 Participants
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-emergent Serious AEs, Treatment-emergent AEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TESAEs113 Participants
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-emergent Serious AEs, Treatment-emergent AEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TEAEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation29 Participants
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-emergent Serious AEs, Treatment-emergent AEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TEAESIs75 Participants
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-emergent Serious AEs, Treatment-emergent AEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TEAEs613 Participants
OL: Placebo/Tolebrutinib 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-emergent Serious AEs, Treatment-emergent AEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TEAEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation1 Participants
OL: Placebo/Tolebrutinib 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-emergent Serious AEs, Treatment-emergent AEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TESAEs9 Participants
OL: Placebo/Tolebrutinib 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-emergent Serious AEs, Treatment-emergent AEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TEAESIs6 Participants
OL: Placebo/Tolebrutinib 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-emergent Serious AEs, Treatment-emergent AEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TEAEs47 Participants
OL: Tolebrutinib 60 mg/Tolebrutinib 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-emergent Serious AEs, Treatment-emergent AEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TEAESIs10 Participants
OL: Tolebrutinib 60 mg/Tolebrutinib 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-emergent Serious AEs, Treatment-emergent AEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TESAEs11 Participants
OL: Tolebrutinib 60 mg/Tolebrutinib 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-emergent Serious AEs, Treatment-emergent AEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TEAEs80 Participants
OL: Tolebrutinib 60 mg/Tolebrutinib 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-emergent Serious AEs, Treatment-emergent AEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TEAEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation0 Participants
Secondary

Percent Change in Brain Volume at EOS Compared to Month 6

MRI of the brain was performed to evaluate percent change in brain volume which is considered as a marker of the central nervous system degenerative process. Least squares (LS) mean is presented.

Time frame: Month 6 to EOS (up to approximately 47 months)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants according to the intervention group allocated by the randomization, irrespective of the study intervention received. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
DB: PlaceboPercent Change in Brain Volume at EOS Compared to Month 6-0.776 percent changeStandard Error 0.0479
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgPercent Change in Brain Volume at EOS Compared to Month 6-0.694 percent changeStandard Error 0.0336
Comparison: Covariates in the mixed-effect model with repeated measures were treatment group, age at screening (\>40, \<=40 years), geographic region (US, non-US), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, cube root transformed Month 6 brain volume, and cube root transformed Month 6 brain volume-by-visit interaction.p-value: 0.164695% CI: [-0.034, 0.197]Mixed model repeated measures (MMRM)
Secondary

Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Tolebrutinib and M2 Metabolite

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess Tmax of tolebrutinib and M2 metabolite using a PopPK model.

Time frame: 30-90 minutes post-dose at Months 6, 9, and 12 and 2.5-5 hours post-dose at Months 6 and 12

Population: The PK population included all participants in the safety population with at least 1 non-missing PK sample after first dose of the study intervention. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DB: PlaceboTime to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Tolebrutinib and M2 MetaboliteTolebrutinib1.42 hour (h)Standard Deviation 0.674
DB: PlaceboTime to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Tolebrutinib and M2 MetaboliteM2 Metabolite1.52 hour (h)Standard Deviation 0.667
Secondary

Time to Onset of 3-month Confirmed Disability Progression as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale

The EDSS is a disability scale that assesses the following 7 functional domains: visual, brainstem, pyramidal \[motor\], cerebellar \[coordination\], sensory, cerebral, and bowel/bladder. The total EDSS ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) (0.5 increments from 1-10; next increase after 0 is 1). Higher scores indicated increased disability. Time to onset of 3-month CDP was defined as the time from randomization to the onset of a sustained increase from baseline in EDSS score (of \>=1.0 point from the baseline EDSS score when the baseline score is \<=5.0, of \>=0.5 points when the baseline EDSS score is \>5.0) confirmed after a minimum 3-month interval. The confirmation of 3-month CDP followed the same criteria as that of 6-month CDP.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to approximately 47 months

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants according to the intervention group allocated by the randomization, irrespective of the study intervention received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
DB: PlaceboTime to Onset of 3-month Confirmed Disability Progression as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale11.96 months
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgTime to Onset of 3-month Confirmed Disability Progression as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale12.04 months
Comparison: Derived using Cox proportional-hazards model with robust variance estimation. Covariates were treatment group, age at screening (\>40, \<=40 years), geographic region (US, non-US), baseline EDSS score and baseline Gd-enhancing T1 lesions (presence, absence).p-value: 0.013495% CI: [0.607, 0.944]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Time to Onset of 6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale

The EDSS is a disability scale that assesses the following 7 functional domains: visual, brainstem, pyramidal \[motor\], cerebellar \[coordination\], sensory, cerebral, and bowel/bladder. The total EDSS ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) (0.5 increments from 1-10; next increase after 0 is 1). Higher scores indicated increased disability. CDI was defined as a \>=1 point decrease in the EDSS score from baseline confirmed over at least 6 months.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to approximately 47 months

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants according to the intervention group allocated by the randomization, irrespective of the study intervention received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
DB: PlaceboTime to Onset of 6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale12.04 months
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgTime to Onset of 6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale11.89 months
Comparison: Derived using Cox proportional-hazards model with robust variance estimation. Covariates were treatment group, age at screening (\>40, \<=40 years), geographic region (US, non-US), baseline EDSS score and baseline Gd-enhancing T1 lesions (presence, absence).p-value: 0.020695% CI: [1.102, 3.214]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in the 9-hole Peg Test (HPT) for at Least 3 Months

The 9-HPT is a brief, standardized, quantitative test of upper extremity function and the time to complete the 9-HPT is used to assess a participant's manual dexterity and fine motor skills. A participant was asked to place the pegs into the holes and remove them with the dominant and non-dominant hand; two successful trials for each hand. The amount of time (in seconds) required to place and remove all nine pegs was recorded for each trial (ranging from 10 to 300 seconds). The mean time to test completion served for assessment of the participant's hand dexterity. Higher value indicated worse outcome. An increase of \>20% from the baseline in the 9-HPT was considered meaningful worsening; time to onset of sustained 20% increase for at least 3 months is presented.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to approximately 47 months

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants according to the intervention group allocated by the randomization, irrespective of the study intervention received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
DB: PlaceboTime to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in the 9-hole Peg Test (HPT) for at Least 3 Months12.39 months
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgTime to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in the 9-hole Peg Test (HPT) for at Least 3 Months12.21 months
Comparison: Derived using Cox proportional-hazards model with robust variance estimation. Covariates were treatment group, age at screening (\>40, \<=40 years), geographic region (US, non-US), baseline EDSS score and baseline Gd-enhancing T1 lesions (presence, absence).p-value: 0.842895% CI: [0.735, 1.286]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in the Timed 25-foot Walk (T25-FW) for at Least 3 Months

The T25-FW test is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test used to assess a participant's walking ability. A participant was directed to one end of a clearly marked 25-foot course and instructed to walk 25 feet as quickly as safely possible for 2 trials. The amount of time (in seconds) to walk 25 feet was recorded (ranging from 2.2 to 180 seconds). The mean walk time was used for assessment of the participant's walking ability. Higher value indicated worse outcome. An increase of \>20% from the baseline in the T25-FW test was considered meaningful worsening; time to onset of sustained 20% increase for at least 3 months is presented.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to approximately 47 months

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants according to the intervention group allocated by the randomization, irrespective of the study intervention received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
DB: PlaceboTime to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in the Timed 25-foot Walk (T25-FW) for at Least 3 Months9.25 months
DB: Tolebrutinib 60 mgTime to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in the Timed 25-foot Walk (T25-FW) for at Least 3 Months9.54 months
Comparison: Derived using Cox proportional-hazards model with robust variance estimation. Covariates were treatment group, age at screening (\>40, \<=40 years), geographic region (US, non-US), baseline EDSS score and baseline Gd-enhancing T1 lesions (presence, absence).p-value: 0.00495% CI: [0.64, 0.919]Regression, Cox

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026