Skip to content

A Novel, Comprehensive Approach to Post-stroke Gait Rehabilitation

A Novel, Comprehensive Approach to Post-stroke Gait Rehabilitation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04411303
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-06-02
Start date
2021-06-09
Completion date
2025-12-14
Last updated
2025-11-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident)

Keywords

stroke, walking, rehabilitation, aerobic exercise

Brief summary

The goal of this project is to determine the feasibility and optimal parameters of a novel, comprehensive approach to gait training in individuals with chronic stroke. The comprehensive approach includes biofeedback-based gait training and aerobic exercise intensity-based gait training.

Detailed description

The goal of this project is to determine the feasibility and optimal parameters of a novel, comprehensive approach to gait training in individuals with chronic stroke. Current post-stroke gait training follows two distinct approaches that target different domains of gait dysfunction (as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Health, and Disability). Biofeedback-based gait training is typically employed to treat walking pattern impairments (e.g., kinematic deviations relative to able-bodied controls); whereas, aerobic exercise intensity-based gait training is the current gold-standard to treat walking activity limitations (e.g., slow walking speeds). Here, the investigators propose to test the impact of combining these approaches into a single intervention to work toward the development of a more effective, comprehensive approach to gait rehabilitation for persons post-stroke. The central hypothesis is that individuals with chronic stroke have the capacity to use biofeedback to reduce kinematic gait deviations while walking at a range of recommended aerobic exercise intensity zones. Aim 1 will identify the gait biofeedback variable that elicits the largest reduction in interlimb asymmetry in persons post-stroke. Aim 2 will determine the capacity for persons post-stroke to make biofeedback-driven reductions in their interlimb asymmetry while walking at three different aerobic exercise intensities. Participants with chronic stroke in Aim 1 will each complete three experimental sessions and participants in Aim 2 will complete 1 experimental session. Biomechanical analyses and physiologic assessments will be used across both aims to test our working hypotheses. The investigators expect to show that biofeedback of paretic propulsion leads to the greatest reduction in interlimb asymmetry and that participants have the capacity to make biofeedback-driven interlimb asymmetry reductions while walking at all three aerobic intensities, but the magnitude of reduction will be the largest at a moderate aerobic walking intensity. The proposed work is innovative because it will be the first to test the relative effects of different gait biofeedback variables on whole lower extremity kinematics in persons post-stroke and test a novel combination of two well-established gait training approaches (biofeedback- and intensity-based) for neurologic patient populations. This is a critical next step in moving the post-stroke gait rehabilitation field forward. If successful, this line of work stands to significantly improve the current standard of care in gait rehabilitation post-stroke.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALStep length biofeedback

Participants will be provided with visual feedback of their right and left step lengths on a screen in front of a treadmill.

BEHAVIORALPropulsive force biofeedback

Participants will be provided with real-time visual feedback of anterior-posterior ground reaction forces of the paretic limb during stance phase on a screen in front of a treadmill.

BEHAVIORALInterlimb asymmetry biofeedback

Participants will be provided with visual feedback of stride-by-stride values of their interlimb asymmetry on a screen in front of a treadmill.

BEHAVIORALAerobic intensity-based walking

Participants will walk at three different aerobic intensities. Aerobic intensity will be set based on target heart rate zones calculated with the Karvonen Formula. For low intensity, participants will walk at 30-40% intensity. In moderate intensity conditions, participants will walk at a 50-60% intensity level. In vigorous intensity conditions, participants will walk at an 70-80% intensity level. Aerobic intensity will be manipulated by changing walking speed.

Sponsors

University of Southern California
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \>6 months post stroke, affecting 1 hemisphere of the brain * Independently ambulatory (including use assistive devices) * Able to walk for 5 minutes without stopping * Demonstrates readiness for exercise based on responses to the PAR-Q+ * Participants enrolled in Aim 2 will require medical clearance from physician to participate

Exclusion criteria

* Damage to the pons or cerebellum on MRI or signs of cerebellar involvement * Damage to the basal ganglia or extrapyramidal symptoms * Uncontrolled hypertension (\>160/100mmHg) * Montreal Cognitive Assessment score \< 25 * Orthopedic or pain conditions * Note\*: Pregnant women are excluded from this study to avoid any potential harm to the fetus from the harness used during treadmill walking.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Interlimb Asymmetry - change in performanceMeasured at three timepoints of interest within each testing session: baseline and at the beginning and end of the biofeedback training; participants will complete 3 testing sessions over approximately 2 monthscharacterized as a comparison between the right and left legs of whole lower limb kinematics at heel strike; captured to quantify change in performance with biofeedback

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Interlimb asymmetry - immediate retentionMeasured after biofeedback training in each testing session; participants will complete 3 testing sessions over approximately 2 monthscharacterized as a comparison between the right and left legs of whole lower limb kinematics at heel strike; captured to quantify retention of a newly learned walking pattern

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026