Skip to content

Psychological Impact of the Corona Virus (SARS-CoV-2) and COVID-19 Pandemic in Individuals With Psychiatric Disorders

Psychological Impact and Effect of the Corona Virus (SARS-CoV-2) and COVID-19 Pandemic in Individuals With Psychiatric Disorders - an Online Survey

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04410835
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2020-06-01
Start date
2020-04-28
Completion date
2022-04-30
Last updated
2021-07-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Corona Virus Infection, Psychiatric Disorder, Psychological Distress

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to measure current affective symptoms and psychological distress in individuals with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 pandemic using an online questionnaire survey. In addition, this study aims at identifying individual beliefs, sleep quality, attitudes concerning the virus, the adherence to the measures, believing processes, and coping strategies/resilience patterns referring to COVID-19 in different study centers.

Detailed description

A novel corona virus (SARS-CoV-2) has been identified as the cause of an outbreak of respiratory illness (corona virus disease COVID-19) all over the world. The COVID-19 pandemic is a public health emergency of international concern and poses a challenge to psychological resilience. Studies reviewed the psychological impact of quarantine and reported negative psychological effects including post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger, infection fears, frustration, boredom, inadequate supplies, inadequate information, financial loss, and stigma. A loss of daily structure and reduced social contacts were associated with frustration, boredom, reduced psychological-well being and psychological distress. A recently conducted online questionnaire survey, investigating emotional responses and coping strategies of nurses, found sex differences in anxiety and fear referred to COVID-19 (women showed more severe anxiety and fear than men) and differences between participants from cities showing more anxiety and fear compared with participants from rural showing more sadness. The closer COVID-19 was to the participants, the stronger the anxiety and anger. All these investigated psychological variables (i.e. anxiety, depression, boredom, loss of daily structure) have been found to impact the course and outcome of psychiatric disorders. Nowadays, COVID-19 is a pressure source with great influence, both for individuals and for the social public groups. Different individuals and groups may experience different levels of psychological crisis and patients with psychiatric disorders may experience more or less psychological symptoms than healthy control persons. According to a recent study, lithium, widely used to treat bipolar disorder, has been shown to exhibit antiviral activity and appears as a possible candidate for therapy of COVID-19. However, more research data are needed to develop evidence-driven strategies to reduce adverse psychological impacts and psychiatric symptoms during the pandemic. Scientific questions 1. How do psychiatric patients experience the COVID-19 outbreak including quarantine and are there associations with affective symptoms and psychological distress? Is there a change in symptomatology during time? Are there differences to healthy controls, and between individuals with different diagnosis? 2. Is there a difference between psychiatric patients and healthy controls in regard to emotional response, cognition and behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic and quarantine? Is there a difference between different psychiatric diagnosis groups? 3. Is there an association between consequences of social distance on lifestyle factors (nutrition, sleep quality, physical activity, substance abuse) and are there associations with psychological well-being/psychological symptoms in individuals with psychiatric disorder and controls? Is there a difference between different psychiatric diagnosis groups and healthy controls? 4. What do individuals with psychiatric disorders think about the COVID-19 related measures und quarantine regulations and how is the adherence to the measures? Are there associations between adherence and attitude towards COVID-19 measures? Is there a difference between patients and healthy controls? Is there a difference between different psychiatric diagnosis groups? 5. Are there sex and age differences in the investigated variables? (emotional response to COVID-19 outbreak, attitude towards measures, adherence)? 6. Is there a relationship between an infection with SARS-CoV-2 and disease course in psychiatric disorder? Is there a difference between different psychiatric diagnosis groups and healthy controls? Which role plays lithium treatment (prescribed beyond the study) in this context? The investigators hypothesize, loss of daily structure, reduced social contacts, loneliness, reduced psychiatric care, and other possible lifestyle changes due to the quarantine and social distancing measures, have a negative effect on psychological symptoms (depression, anxiety, somatisation, sleep quality) in individuals with psychiatric disorder compared to healthy controls. In contrast, resilience and positive cognition processes might be positively correlated to psychological well-being.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTOnline Survey

Psychological questionnaires

Sponsors

Medical University of Graz
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Minimum age 18 years * voluntary participation

Exclusion criteria

* Subject refuses to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global symptom load (Anxiety, Somatisation, Depression, Global Symptom Index)1 yearBrief Symptom Inventory-18 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome (more depression, anxiety and somatization); Each item is weighted on a 0-4 interval scale; Minimum = 0, Maximum = 72)
Depressive symptoms1 yearBeck Depression Inventory-II with higher scores mean a worse Outcome (more depressive Symptoms; each item is weighted on a 0-3 interval scale; Minimum = 0, Maximum = 63)
Sleep disorders and Sleep Quality1 yearPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) with higher scores mean a worse Outcome (more sleeping disturbances; Each item is weighted on a 0-3 interval scale; Minimum = 0, Maximum = 63)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Life style changes1 yearLifestyle Questions including physical activity, eating behavior, substance use, smoking
Food Craving1 yearFood Craving Inventory (FCI) with higher scores mean a worse Outcome (more Food craving; Each item is weighted on a 0-4 interval scale; Minimum = 0, Maximum = 112)
COVID-19 associated fears and emotional responses to the pandemic1 yearCOVID-19 questionnaire with higher scores meaning a worse Outcome (more fears and negative emotions; each item is weighted on a 0-10 interval scale)

Countries

Austria

Contacts

Primary ContactEva Reininghaus, Prof.
eva.reininghaus@medunigraz.at004331638580968
Backup ContactNina Dalkner, PD Dr.
nina.dalkner@medunigraz.at004331638530081

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026