Skip to content

Study to Compare Adjuvant Immunotherapy of Bempegaldesleukin Combined With Nivolumab Versus Nivolumab After Complete Resection of Melanoma in Patients at High Risk for Recurrence

A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label Study to Compare Adjuvant Immunotherapy of Bempegaldesleukin Combined With Nivolumab Versus Nivolumab After Complete Resection of Melanoma in Patients at High Risk for Recurrence (PIVOT-12)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04410445
Acronym
PIVOT-12
Enrollment
765
Registered
2020-06-01
Start date
2020-07-27
Completion date
2022-09-22
Last updated
2023-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melanoma, Melanoma (Skin), Melanoma Stage III, Melanoma Stage IV

Keywords

CD122-Biased Agonist, CD122-Biased Cytokine, IL-2 Receptor Agonist, NKTR-214, Bempegaldesleukin, IL-2, Immunotherapy, BEMPEG, Nivolumab, Opdivo®, NIVO, Adjuvant, Skin Cancer, Resectable Melanoma, High Risk of Recurrence Melanoma, Post Resection, Checkpoint Inhibitor

Brief summary

The main purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of bempegaldesleukin plus nivolumab versus nivolumab in patients with completely resected Stage IIIA/B/C/D, or Stage IV cutaneous melanoma who are at high risk for recurrence.

Detailed description

The main purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, as measured by recurrence-free survival (RFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR), of bempegaldesleukin plus nivolumab versus nivolumab in patients with completely resected Stage IIIA (lymph node \[LN\] metastasis \> 1 mm), Stage IIIB/C/D, or Stage IV (American Joint Committee on Cancer \[AJCC\] 8th edition) cutaneous melanoma with no evidence of disease (NED) who are at high risk for recurrence.

Interventions

Specified dose on specified days

BIOLOGICALNivolumab

Specified dose on specified days

Sponsors

Bristol-Myers Squibb
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Nektar Therapeutics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment arms

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female patients, age 12 years or older at the time of signing the informed consent form (age 18 years or older where local regulations, countries, and/or institutional policies do not allow for patients \< 18 years of age (adolescents) to participate). In regions where adolescents are not allowed to participate in the study due to age restrictions, enrolled patients must be ≥ 18 years of age. * Histologically confirmed Stage IIIA (LN metastasis \> 1 mm), IIIB/C/D, or IV (M1a/b/c/d) cutaneous melanoma by AJCC (8th edition) at study entry that has been completely surgically resected within 12 weeks prior to randomization. * Tumor tissue available from biopsy or resected disease must be provided to central laboratory for PD-L1 status analysis. Must have PD-L1 expression classification for stratification purposes. * Disease-free status documented by a complete physical examination and imaging studies within 28 days prior to randomization.

Exclusion criteria

* History of ocular/uveal melanoma or mucosal melanoma. * Active, known or suspected autoimmune disease. Patients with Type I diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism only requiring hormone replacement, skin disorders not requiring systemic treatment, or conditions not expected to recur in the absence of an external trigger are permitted to enroll. * Conditions requiring systemic treatment with either corticosteroids (\> 10 mg daily prednisone equivalent) or other immunosuppressive medications within 14 days of randomization. Inhaled or topical steroids, and adrenal replacement steroid doses \> 10 mg daily prednisone equivalent, are permitted in the absence of active autoimmune disease. * Prior therapy for melanoma except surgery for the melanoma lesion(s) and/or adjuvant radiation therapy for central nervous system lesions. * Prior therapy with interferon, talimogene laherparepvec (Imylgic®), interleukin-2 (IL-2) directed therapy, anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-PD-L2, anti-CD137, or anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 antibody (including ipilimumab or any other antibody or drug specifically targeting T cell co-stimulation or checkpoint pathways). * Prior malignancy active within the previous 3 years except for locally potentially curable cancers that have been apparently cured.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence-free Survival (RFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) of Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab Versus Nivolumab Alone.Up to 21 monthsRecurrence-free Survival (RFS) of bempegaldesleukin plus nivolumab versus nivolumab alone is determined based on the disease recurrence date provided by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) and is defined as the time between date of randomization and date of first recurrence (local, regional, or distant metastasis by BICR), new primary melanoma (by BICR), or all-cause death, whichever occurs first.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS) by Investigator in Patients Who Are Stage III at Study Entry.Up to 21 monthsDistant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) by Investigator is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of first distant metastasis by Investigator or date of death due to any cause, in patients who have Stage III melanoma at study entry.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Approximately up to 21 monthsTo evaluate safety and tolerability of (NKTR-214) 0.006 mg/kg in combination with nivolumab 360 mg IV infusion (or 4.5 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for patients \<40 kg) and nivolumab 480 mg IV infusion (or 6.0 mg/kg IV infusion q4w for patients \< 40 kg). Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an AE that was not present prior to treatment with study drug but appeared following treatment or was present at treatment start date but worsened during treatment-emergent period. The treatment-emergent period is defined as the period from the date of the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the date of the last dose of study drug or the day prior to the initiation of subsequent anticancer treatment, whichever occurs first.
Changes at 6 Months of Treatment From Baseline in Scores for the Global Health/Quality of Life (GH/QoL) and Physical Functioning Subscales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life QuestionnaireFrom baseline, up to approximately 6 monthsThe EORTC QLQ-C30 comprises 30 items (i.e. single questions). 24 of which are aggregated into nine multi-item scales, that is, five functioning scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting) and one global health status scale. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the global health status/quality of life scale indicates a better level of functioning, and positive changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change. Due to the study termination, results for the mean change from baseline for GH/QoL and the physical functioning subscale were analyzed at approximately 6 months of treatment.
Overall Survival (OS) of Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab Versus Nivolumab AloneUp to 21 monthsOverall Survival (OS) is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause. Patients who do not have a date of death will be censored on the last date for which a patient was known to be alive.
Recurrence-free Survival (RFS) by Investigator of Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab Versus Nivolumab Alone.Up to 21 monthsRecurrence-free Survival by Investigator is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of first recurrence (local, regional, or distant metastasis by Investigator), new primary melanoma (by Investigator), or all-cause death, whichever occurs first.
Time to Disease Progression After the Next Line of Treatment for Study Patients Following Discontinuation of Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab Versus NivolumabUp to 21 monthsTime to disease progression after the next line of treatment is defined as time from randomization to progression per Investigator after the start of next line of therapy or death, whichever occurs first. Patients who were alive and without progression after the next line of therapy can be censored at last known alive date.
Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Patients Who Are Stage III at Study Entry.Up to 21 monthsDistant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of first distant metastasis by BICR or date of death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, in patients who have Stage III melanoma at study entry.
Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression as a Predictive Biomarker for Recurrence-free Survival (RFS)Up to 21 monthsThe predictive strength of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression as a biomarker will be measured by the endpoint RFS by BICR based on PD-L1 expression level.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) + Nivolumab
Arm A: bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) 0.006 mg/kg intravenous (IV) infusion in combination with nivolumab 360 mg IV infusion (or 4.5 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for patients \<40 kg) were administrated every 3 weeks q3w).
378
Nivolumab
Arm B: Nivolumab 480 mg IV infusion (or 6.0 mg/kg IV infusion q4w for patients \< 40 kg) every 4 weeks (q4w).
387
Total765

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up39
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2715

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalBempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) + NivolumabNivolumab
Age, Continuous55.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.83
55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.21
56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.45
ECOG
ECOG 0
702 Participants351 Participants351 Participants
ECOG
ECOG 1
63 Participants27 Participants36 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
32 Participants11 Participants21 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
649 Participants326 Participants323 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
84 Participants41 Participants43 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
49 Participants22 Participants27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
711 Participants354 Participants357 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
77 participants39 participants38 participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
21 participants9 participants12 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
20 participants10 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
49 participants25 participants24 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
90 participants55 participants35 participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
43 participants18 participants25 participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
12 participants9 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
74 participants35 participants39 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
20 participants10 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
33 participants15 participants18 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
22 participants11 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Portugal
13 participants7 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
3 participants2 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
50 participants25 participants25 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
84 participants37 participants47 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
13 participants5 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
141 participants66 participants75 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
310 Participants162 Participants148 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
455 Participants216 Participants239 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
9 / 3784 / 387
other
Total, other adverse events
369 / 378329 / 387
serious
Total, serious adverse events
74 / 37833 / 387

Outcome results

Primary

Recurrence-free Survival (RFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) of Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab Versus Nivolumab Alone.

Recurrence-free Survival (RFS) of bempegaldesleukin plus nivolumab versus nivolumab alone is determined based on the disease recurrence date provided by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) and is defined as the time between date of randomization and date of first recurrence (local, regional, or distant metastasis by BICR), new primary melanoma (by BICR), or all-cause death, whichever occurs first.

Time frame: Up to 21 months

Population: The study was terminated early due to the closure of the bempegaldesleukin clinical development program due to lack of enhanced efficacy being observed in combination with nivolumab therapy over nivolumab monotherapy for metastatic melanoma. As a consequence, no aggregate blinded independent central review data were collected; no comparative analyses between bempegaldesleukin + nivolumab arm vs nivolumab arm were conducted for this efficacy endpoint.

Secondary

Changes at 6 Months of Treatment From Baseline in Scores for the Global Health/Quality of Life (GH/QoL) and Physical Functioning Subscales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire

The EORTC QLQ-C30 comprises 30 items (i.e. single questions). 24 of which are aggregated into nine multi-item scales, that is, five functioning scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting) and one global health status scale. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the global health status/quality of life scale indicates a better level of functioning, and positive changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change. Due to the study termination, results for the mean change from baseline for GH/QoL and the physical functioning subscale were analyzed at approximately 6 months of treatment.

Time frame: From baseline, up to approximately 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) + NivolumabChanges at 6 Months of Treatment From Baseline in Scores for the Global Health/Quality of Life (GH/QoL) and Physical Functioning Subscales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life QuestionnaireGlobal Health Status/QoL at 6 Months77.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.342
Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) + NivolumabChanges at 6 Months of Treatment From Baseline in Scores for the Global Health/Quality of Life (GH/QoL) and Physical Functioning Subscales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life QuestionnairePhysical Functioning Subscale at Baseline91.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.159
Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) + NivolumabChanges at 6 Months of Treatment From Baseline in Scores for the Global Health/Quality of Life (GH/QoL) and Physical Functioning Subscales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life QuestionnaireGlobal Health Status/QoL at Baseline79.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.284
Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) + NivolumabChanges at 6 Months of Treatment From Baseline in Scores for the Global Health/Quality of Life (GH/QoL) and Physical Functioning Subscales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life QuestionnairePhysical Functioning Subscale at 6 Months90.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.417
Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) + NivolumabChanges at 6 Months of Treatment From Baseline in Scores for the Global Health/Quality of Life (GH/QoL) and Physical Functioning Subscales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life QuestionnairePhysical Functioning Subscale Changes at 6 Months from Baseline-2.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.168
Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) + NivolumabChanges at 6 Months of Treatment From Baseline in Scores for the Global Health/Quality of Life (GH/QoL) and Physical Functioning Subscales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life QuestionnaireGlobal Health Status/QoL Changes at 6 Months from Baseline-3.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.933
NivolumabChanges at 6 Months of Treatment From Baseline in Scores for the Global Health/Quality of Life (GH/QoL) and Physical Functioning Subscales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life QuestionnairePhysical Functioning Subscale Changes at 6 Months from Baseline-1.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.861
NivolumabChanges at 6 Months of Treatment From Baseline in Scores for the Global Health/Quality of Life (GH/QoL) and Physical Functioning Subscales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life QuestionnaireGlobal Health Status/QoL at Baseline79.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.698
NivolumabChanges at 6 Months of Treatment From Baseline in Scores for the Global Health/Quality of Life (GH/QoL) and Physical Functioning Subscales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life QuestionnaireGlobal Health Status/QoL at 6 Months78.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.776
NivolumabChanges at 6 Months of Treatment From Baseline in Scores for the Global Health/Quality of Life (GH/QoL) and Physical Functioning Subscales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life QuestionnaireGlobal Health Status/QoL Changes at 6 Months from Baseline-1.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.921
NivolumabChanges at 6 Months of Treatment From Baseline in Scores for the Global Health/Quality of Life (GH/QoL) and Physical Functioning Subscales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life QuestionnairePhysical Functioning Subscale at Baseline91.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.515
NivolumabChanges at 6 Months of Treatment From Baseline in Scores for the Global Health/Quality of Life (GH/QoL) and Physical Functioning Subscales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life QuestionnairePhysical Functioning Subscale at 6 Months91.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.591
Secondary

Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Patients Who Are Stage III at Study Entry.

Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of first distant metastasis by BICR or date of death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, in patients who have Stage III melanoma at study entry.

Time frame: Up to 21 months

Population: The study was terminated early due to the closure of the bempegaldesleukin clinical development program due to lack of enhanced efficacy being observed in combination with nivolumab therapy over nivolumab monotherapy for metastatic melanoma. As a consequence, no blinded independent central review data were collected; no comparative analyses between bempegaldesleukin + nivolumab arm vs nivolumab arm were conducted for this efficacy endpoint.

Secondary

Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS) by Investigator in Patients Who Are Stage III at Study Entry.

Distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) by Investigator is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of first distant metastasis by Investigator or date of death due to any cause, in patients who have Stage III melanoma at study entry.

Time frame: Up to 21 months

Population: Participants include only patients who have Stage III melanoma at study entry. The results were not estimable due to insufficient number of events. The study was terminated early due to the closure of the bempegaldesleukin clinical development program due to lack of enhanced efficacy being observed in combination with nivolumab therapy over nivolumab monotherapy for metastatic melanoma.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) + NivolumabDistant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS) by Investigator in Patients Who Are Stage III at Study Entry.NA months
NivolumabDistant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS) by Investigator in Patients Who Are Stage III at Study Entry.NA months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

To evaluate safety and tolerability of (NKTR-214) 0.006 mg/kg in combination with nivolumab 360 mg IV infusion (or 4.5 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for patients \<40 kg) and nivolumab 480 mg IV infusion (or 6.0 mg/kg IV infusion q4w for patients \< 40 kg). Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an AE that was not present prior to treatment with study drug but appeared following treatment or was present at treatment start date but worsened during treatment-emergent period. The treatment-emergent period is defined as the period from the date of the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the date of the last dose of study drug or the day prior to the initiation of subsequent anticancer treatment, whichever occurs first.

Time frame: Approximately up to 21 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) + NivolumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Patients who had a TEAE370 Participants
Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) + NivolumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Patients who had a Serious TEAE74 Participants
Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) + NivolumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Patients who had a TEAE of Grade 3 or higher120 Participants
Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) + NivolumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Patients who had a TEAE Leading to Death1 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Patients who had a TEAE Leading to Death0 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Patients who had a TEAE330 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Patients who had a TEAE of Grade 3 or higher50 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Patients who had a Serious TEAE33 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) of Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab Versus Nivolumab Alone

Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause. Patients who do not have a date of death will be censored on the last date for which a patient was known to be alive.

Time frame: Up to 21 months

Population: For this outcome measure, the results were not estimable due to insufficient number of events. The study was terminated early due to the closure of the bempegaldesleukin clinical program due to lack of enhanced efficacy being observed in combination with nivolumab therapy over nivolumab monotherapy for metastatic melanoma. As a consequence, no comparative analyses between bempegaldesleukin + nivolumab arm vs nivolumab arm were conducted for this efficacy endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) + NivolumabOverall Survival (OS) of Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab Versus Nivolumab AloneNA months
NivolumabOverall Survival (OS) of Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab Versus Nivolumab AloneNA months
Secondary

Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression as a Predictive Biomarker for Recurrence-free Survival (RFS)

The predictive strength of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression as a biomarker will be measured by the endpoint RFS by BICR based on PD-L1 expression level.

Time frame: Up to 21 months

Population: The study was terminated early due to the closure of the bempegaldesleukin clinical development program due to lack of enhanced efficacy being observed in combination with nivolumab therapy over nivolumab monotherapy for metastatic melanoma. As a consequence, no aggregate blinded independent central review data were collected; no comparative analyses between bempegaldesleukin + nivolumab arm vs nivolumab arm were conducted for this efficacy endpoint.

Secondary

Recurrence-free Survival (RFS) by Investigator of Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab Versus Nivolumab Alone.

Recurrence-free Survival by Investigator is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of first recurrence (local, regional, or distant metastasis by Investigator), new primary melanoma (by Investigator), or all-cause death, whichever occurs first.

Time frame: Up to 21 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) + NivolumabRecurrence-free Survival (RFS) by Investigator of Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab Versus Nivolumab Alone.NA months
NivolumabRecurrence-free Survival (RFS) by Investigator of Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab Versus Nivolumab Alone.NA months
Secondary

Time to Disease Progression After the Next Line of Treatment for Study Patients Following Discontinuation of Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab Versus Nivolumab

Time to disease progression after the next line of treatment is defined as time from randomization to progression per Investigator after the start of next line of therapy or death, whichever occurs first. Patients who were alive and without progression after the next line of therapy can be censored at last known alive date.

Time frame: Up to 21 months

Population: The study was terminated early due to the closure of the bempegaldesleukin clinical development program due to lack of enhanced efficacy being observed in combination with nivolumab therapy over nivolumab monotherapy for metastatic melanoma. As a consequence, no data were collected for this efficacy endpoint.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026