Skip to content

Defining the 'Sniffing Position in Infants and Toddlers - A Pilot Study

A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study to Define and Validate the Standard 'Sniffing Position' in Infants and Toddlers.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04410289
Enrollment
40
Registered
2020-06-01
Start date
2019-07-01
Completion date
2019-12-26
Last updated
2020-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Management, Children, Only, Endotracheal Intubation, Infant ALL

Keywords

pediatric intubation, direct laryngoscopy, sniffing position, external auditory meatus, pediatric anesthesia, pediatric airway management

Brief summary

The sniffing position is widely accepted as a favorable position for direct laryngoscopy (DL) in both pediatric and adult patients. External anatomical markers are well documented to confirm proper 'sniffing position' in adults, but data on their use in the pediatric population is sparse. The investigators propose to define these markers in young children and investigate whether patients positioned using this standardized approach have better intubating conditions than those positioned randomly per the preference of the anesthesiologist.

Detailed description

The procedure of endotracheal intubation in adults and children is a continuum, and begins with proper head positioning prior to direct laryngoscopy (DL). It is an accepted paradigm that proper positioning optimizes intubating conditions, and decreases subsequent airway maneuvers and manipulation. The sniffing position is an accepted airway positioning concept in pediatric airway management, and continues to be recommended by experts and textbooks in the field. Anatomical peculiarities such as the large head relative to the torso in infants and toddlers is assumed to put the head in proper position when gently extended. However, reproducible parameters to confirm optimal head positioning remain vague and unclear. In the absence of objective and measurable markers, practitioners position infants and toddlers according to their individual preferences, and as such the procedure lacks definition and objective clarity. The investigators plan to recruit 40 healthy patients between the ages of 1 month - 48 months and randomize them to be positioned either according to a predetermined algorithm or positioned freely according to the provider's preference. Patients randomized to the intervention group will be positioned with the aim to horizontally align the external auditory meatus (EAM) with the sternal notch (SN). In summary, the study aims to define the sniffing position for infants and toddlers using reproducible objective secondary markers, and investigate whether a systematic approach to positioning using such markers improves direct laryngoscopic outcomes in the young pediatric patient population.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAirway positioning per specified protocol followed by Direct Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation

Positioning of the patient's head and neck for the purpose of direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation

PROCEDUREAirway positioning per provider preference followed by Direct Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation

Positioning of the patient's head and neck for the purpose of direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation

Sponsors

Tufts Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 48 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* healthy infants and toddlers undergoing non-emergent surgery under general anesthesia with an oral endotracheal tube

Exclusion criteria

* neonates (infants under 1 month of age), infants and toddlers with congenital syndromes affecting the airway, and patients undergoing emergency surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) ScoreThe brief time involved (5-10 minutes) involving the process of head positioning, direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.To assess the difference in IDS scores between the study and control groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Angles of Deviation of the EAM-SN plane and Chin-Sinciput Plane from the HorizontalPost-hoc analysis using a computer program to calculate angles. 10 minutes per patient.Secondary outcome was to analyze and compare the degree of alignment or nonalignment of the EAM-SN plane and the sinciput-chin plane in both groups. Angles of deviation of the EAM-SN and chin-sinciput plane were measured in each cohort based on photographic data collected. A positive angle deviation indicated head flexion and a negative angle indicated head extension.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026