Skip to content

Non-exercise Physical Activity Intervention

Effects of Dynamic Standing vs. Static Standing on Subjective Fatigue Symptoms

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04410055
Acronym
STAND
Enrollment
120
Registered
2020-06-01
Start date
2012-01-08
Completion date
2022-01-08
Last updated
2020-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabete Mellitus, Aging, Cognitive Change

Brief summary

Physical inactivity is prevalent in older adults and poses a risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes. The aim of this pilot study was to examine the effect of non-exercise physical activity using a standing desk on clinical variables in older adults with type 2 diabetes.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSitting

We proposed a dynamic standing approach (working while standing accompanied by small periodic stepping movements) as a more tolerable and thereby more applicative lifestyle modification. To evaluate this form on healthy subjects, three different conditions were applied: 3 hours of sitting, static standing and dynamic standing. Both standing conditions were done with height-adjustable table which was developed at the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA)

BEHAVIORALStatic standing

We proposed a dynamic standing approach (working while standing accompanied by small periodic stepping movements) as a more tolerable and thereby more applicative lifestyle modification. To evaluate this form on healthy subjects, three different conditions were applied: 3 hours of sitting, static standing and dynamic standing. Both standing conditions were done with height-adjustable table which was developed at the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA)

We proposed a dynamic standing approach (working while standing accompanied by small periodic stepping movements) as a more tolerable and thereby more applicative lifestyle modification. To evaluate this form on healthy subjects, three different conditions were applied: 3 hours of sitting, static standing and dynamic standing. Both standing conditions were done with height-adjustable table which was developed at the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA)

Sponsors

University of Michigan
CollaboratorOTHER
Science and Research Centre Koper
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* older participants (65+ years) with clinically confirmed type 2 diabetes * Body mass index above 25 and less than 40 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

* participants unable to perform a short clinical and motor function test battery (sABC test, Mini-BEST)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oxygen consumptionchange in oxygen consumption between all three conditions, which will be measured with a minimum washout period of 3 daysOxygen uptake VO2 (ml/min/kg)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Executive controlchange in executive control and cognitive switching levels between all three conditions, which will be measured with a minimum washout period of 3 daysExecutive functions measured with Trail Making Test (seconds)
Attention levelschange in attentional levels between all three conditions, which will be measured with a minimum washout period of 3 daysMeasuring attention with Stroop test (seconds)

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactNicolaas Bohnen, MD, PhD
nbohnen@med.umich.edu

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026