Skip to content

Stress Induced by Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity - Should Speculum and Indentation Rather be Avoided

Stress Induced by Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity - Should Speculum and Indentation Rather be Avoided

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04408807
Acronym
stressROP
Enrollment
37
Registered
2020-05-29
Start date
2019-09-03
Completion date
2020-02-27
Last updated
2022-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Retinopathy of Prematurity

Brief summary

The purpose is to assess the hypothesis that indirect ophthalmoscopy for retinopathy of prematurity eye examination (ROPEE) screening without the use of a lid speculum and scleral indentation (speculum-free, SpF) is less painful/stressful than funduscopy with speculum (Sp) and scleral indentation.

Detailed description

A prospective randomized cross-over study was conducted for the comparison of the two techniques of funduscopy for ROPEE screening, i.e. with (Sp) or without (SpF) the use of a speculum and indentor. A random number table was used to allocate participants into either a) receiving Sp funduscopy on their first and SpF on their second screening examination a week later, or b) receiving SpF first and Sp a week later.

Interventions

OTHERSpeculum-free (SpF) fundoscopy

Indirect ophthalmoscopy without the use of eyelid speculum and scleral indentation

OTHERSpeculum (Sp) fundoscopy

Indirect ophthalmoscopy with the use of eyelid speculum and scleral indentation

Sponsors

Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Weeks to 37 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Preterm neonates undergoing screening for ROP, i.e. * with GA \< 32weeks and/or BW \< 1501grams * infants of greater BW and GA with increased comorbidity, e.g. sepsis, prolonged need for oxygen supplementation etc., as judged by the attending neonatologist

Exclusion criteria

1. Severe clinical condition with unstable vital signs to the extent that stress is not desired and the examination need to be postponed. 2. Diagnosis of traumatic apoptosis of the corneal epithelium / corneal ulcer. 3. Neonates under sedative/analgesic treatment. 4. Intraventricular hemorrhage (III,IV degree), moderate/severe neurological impairment, other conditions that could alter pain response.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised score (PIPP)a) before the intervention [the effect of mydriasis (PIPP1)] b) at the end of the intervention [the effect of funduscopy (PIPP2)] c) 10-20 minutes after the intervention [the overall effect of the examination, i.e. mydriasis and funduscopy (PIPP3)]

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Crying score of the Bernese pain scaleDuring the examination
Adverse events including arrythmia/bradycardia, apnoea, increased oxygen demands and feed intoleranceDuring the examination and during the 24 hours after the examination
Adequacy of judging the presence of treatment-requiring ROPAt the end of ROPEE screening
Duration of fundoscopyDuring the examination

Countries

Greece

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026