Skip to content

Comparison of Sleep Disordered Breathing Events Detected by the CPAP Device prismaLine With Polysomnography

Untersuchung Der Übereinstimmung Der Ereigniserkennung Von prismaLine Geräten Mit Der Polysomnographie

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04407949
Enrollment
70
Registered
2020-05-29
Start date
2019-01-17
Completion date
2020-09-30
Last updated
2020-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sleep Apnea Syndromes

Keywords

CPAP, Apnea, Hypopnea, event detection

Brief summary

Evaluation of residual sleep disordered breathing (SDB) under continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy with comparison of the automatic detected SDB event indices from CPAP machines with manual scored polysomnography (PSG).

Detailed description

The evaluation of residual sleep disordered breathing (SDB) in sleep apnea (SA) after initiation of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is important to verify the therapeutic success. In clinical practice, the internal records of CPAP devices are utilized to determine the therapeutic success, during either medical consultations or telemetric observation. This study was designed to evaluate the quality of SDB Event Indices (EI), which are recorded by the CPAP device (Prisma, Löwenstein Medical Technology). The detected events of a manual scored polysomnography (PSG) in the sleep laboratory will be compared with the simultaneously recorded events of the CPAP device. This shall lead to recommendations regarding the situations, and in which degree the event detection of the CPAP devices may be meaningful to determine the therapeutic success of home sleep apnea therapy.

Interventions

OTHERCPAP Treatment

Comparing events from the CPAP device with the events scored in PSG

Sponsors

Heinen und Löwenstein GmbH & Co. KG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Institut für Pneumologie Hagen Ambrock eV
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Every enrolled patient underwent a CPAP - Titration under PSG with predefined pressure steps. Afterwards breathing events are scored manually based on AASM Criteria by a trained study member. The events will be compared with the readout from the CPAP Device.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* PSG diagnostic not older than 3 month, * AHI\>15, CPAP indication, * age \>18, * nasal CPAP mask, * written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* CPAP contraindication, * participation in another clinical trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
apnea- hypopnea- index (AHI)up to 8 hoursTotal number (N) and index (N/h) of sleep disordered breathing events (apnoeas plus hypopneas) from PSG and device log

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
hypopnea index relating to oxygen desaturationup to 8 hourstotal number of Hypopneas (N) and Index (N/h) scored under AASM criteria for hypopneas, both rules. 1A: hypopnea events with \>= 3% oxygen desaturation and 1B: hypopnea events with \>= 4% oxygen desaturation.
central and obstructive hypopnea indexup to 8 hourstotal number (N) and Index (N/h) of hypopneas scored under AASM criteria for central and obstructive hypopneas.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026