Skip to content

Scaling CRC Screening Through Outreach, Referral, and Engagement (SCORE)

Scaling Colorectal Cancer Screening Through Outreach, Referral, and Engagement (SCORE): A State-Level Program to Reduce Colorectal Cancer Burden in Vulnerable Populations

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04406714
Acronym
SCORE
Enrollment
4318
Registered
2020-05-28
Start date
2020-07-07
Completion date
2024-09-02
Last updated
2026-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

Cancer Screening, Colonoscopy, Community Health Centers, Implementation Science, Patient Navigation

Brief summary

This study will test the effectiveness of mailing fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) in increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates in U.S. adults ages 45-75. We are implementing this study in two age groups, 45-49 years and 50-75 years.

Detailed description

Trial (Age Group 50-75) This randomized controlled trial assesses the effectiveness, feasibility, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness of mailing FITs from a central location to patients served by FQHCs. Subjects are randomly selected and assigned to receive either a mailed FIT intervention (Arm 1: Trial Mailed FIT Intervention - Age Group 50-75) or usual care (Arm 2: Trial Usual Care - Age Group 50-75). To assess United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations for annual screening, we will mail subjects one round of FIT per year for up to two years. Sub-study (Age Group 45-49) A sub-study assesses the effectiveness of mailing FITs from a central location to patients who are 45-49 years of age and newly eligible for CRC screening. The sub-study also assesses the impact of varying the appearance of the FIT packet mailing envelope on FIT return. All eligible patients from one FQHC clinic site are randomly assigned to receive either a mailed FIT intervention that includes an enhanced mailing envelope (Arm 3: Sub-study Mailed FIT Intervention Enhanced Envelope - Age Group 45-49) or a plain envelope (Arm 4: Sub-study Mailed FIT Active Comparator Plain Envelope - Age Group 45-49). The Trial (Age Group 50-75) and the Sub-study (Age Group 45-49) also assess the effectiveness of delivering patient navigation from a central location to facilitate follow up colonoscopy for patients with a positive (abnormal) FIT result.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTrial Mailed FIT Intervention - Age Group 50-75

Subjects are mailed an introductory letter advising them that they will receive a FIT kit in the mail. Next, subjects are mailed a FIT packet in an envelope that contains a cover letter, CRC information sheet, FIT instruction sheet, and FIT kit with a pre-paid return envelope. Subjects receive up to two mailed letters reminding them to complete and return the FIT. Subjects receive FIT results via letter or phone call.

BEHAVIORALSub-Study Mailed FIT Intervention Enhanced Envelope - Age Group 45-49

Subjects are mailed an introductory letter advising them that they will receive a FIT kit in the mail. Next, subjects are mailed a FIT packet in an enhanced envelope that contains a cover letter, CRC information sheet, FIT instruction sheet, and FIT kit with a pre-paid return envelope. The enhanced envelope is a yellow padded envelope with a USPS tracking label and sticker message: "Important information from your doctor". Subjects receive up to two mailed letters reminding them to complete and return the FIT. Subjects receive FIT results via letter or phone call.

BEHAVIORALSub-Study Mailed FIT Active Comparator Plain Envelope - Age Group 45-49

Subjects are mailed an introductory letter advising them that they will receive a FIT kit in the mail. Next, subjects are mailed a FIT packet in plain envelope that contains a cover letter, CRC information sheet, FIT instruction sheet, and FIT kit with a pre-paid return envelope. The plain envelope is a white envelope without a USPS tracking label or sticker message. Subjects receive up to two mailed letters reminding them to complete and return the FIT. Subjects receive FIT results via letter or phone call.

Sponsors

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
East Carolina University
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Trial (Age Group 50-75) Using a randomized controlled trial study design, subjects are assigned to one of two arms: Arm 1: Trial Mailed FIT Intervention; or Arm 2: Trial Usual Care. Arm 1 (intervention) receives a mailed FIT plus up to two reminder letters. Subjects are randomized 1:1 at baseline and remain in their assigned arm for the duration of the study (i.e., two annual rounds of mailed FIT). Sub-study (Age Group 45-49) Subjects, ages 45-49, are randomly assigned to one of two arms: Arm 3: Sub-Study Mailed FIT Intervention - Enhanced Envelope; or Arm 4: Sub-study Mailed FIT Active Comparator Plain Envelope. Subjects in both Arm 3 and Arm 4 receive mailed FIT plus up to two reminder letters. Subjects are randomized 1:1 at baseline and remain in their assigned arm for the duration of the sub-study (i.e., one annual round of mailed FIT).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 45-75 years * At average risk for CRC ("average risk" is defined as those patients who do not have any of the following: documented history of CRC, colorectal neoplasms, colorectal polyps, colonic adenomas, family history of CRC among first degree relative \[father, mother, sister, brother\], or diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease) * No record of fecal occult blood test (FOBT)/FIT within the past 12 months or colonoscopy within 10 years, sigmoidoscopy within 5 years, barium enema within 5 years, or computed tomography (CT) colonography within 10 years of the EHR query date * No record of any CRC diagnosis or total colectomy * No record of comorbidities or screening contraindications, including dementia, hospice care, assisted living, end-stage renal disease, and other cancers (glioblastoma, pancreatic cancer, lung cancer, esophageal cancer, liver and bile duct cancer, mesothelioma) * Has a complete North Carolina mailing address in the EHR * Active patient of the clinic (seen within the past 18 months) at the time of randomization * No record of a positive (abnormal) FIT result in the first study round (Trial Ages 50-75 only)

Exclusion criteria

* Age younger than 45 years or older than 75 years * Not at average risk for CRC ("average risk" is defined as those patients who do not have any of the following: documented history of CRC, colorectal neoplasms, colorectal polyps, colonic adenomas, family history of CRC among first degree relative \[father, mother, sister, brother\], or diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease) * Record of FOBT/FIT within the past 12 months or colonoscopy within 10 years, sigmoidoscopy within 5 years, barium enema within 5 years, or CT colonography within 10 years of the EHR query date * Record of any CRC diagnosis or total colectomy * Record of comorbidities or screening contraindications, including dementia, hospice care, assisted living, end-stage renal disease, and other cancers (glioblastoma, pancreatic cancer, lung cancer, esophageal cancer, liver and bile duct cancer, mesothelioma) * Does not have a complete North Carolina mailing address in the EHR * Not an active patient of the clinic (not seen within the past 18 months) at the time of randomization * Record of a positive (abnormal) FIT result reported during the first study round (Trial Ages 50-75)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Subjects Who Completed Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Within 6 Months (Trial - Age Group 50-75)Up to 6 months after randomization"The proportion of subjects who received study Intervention (Age Group 50-75) and did not receive study intervention (Usual Care - Age Group 50-75 who completed CRC screening using any of the screening modalities recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force per electronic health record review. Fecal immunochemical test (FIT), fecal occult blood test \[FOBT\], fecal immunochemical test - deoxyribonucleic acid (FIT-DNA), colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy with FIT, Computerized Tomography colonography."

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subject Colorectal Carcinoma (CRC) and Advanced Adenomas Detected at 12 MonthsUp to 12 months after screening or diagnostic colonoscopy result dateNumber of CRCs and advanced adenomas detected among subjects who received study Intervention (Age Group 50-75) and subjects who did not receive study intervention (Usual Care only - Age Group 50-75) per electronic health record review.
Proportion of Subjects Who Returned a Completed Mailed FIT at 60 DaysUp to 60 days after randomizationThe proportion of subjects who received study Intervention (Age Group - 50-75) and returned a completed FIT per electronic health record review.
Number of Days From CRC Diagnosis to the Date of Evaluation for CRC TreatmentUp to 12 months after CRC diagnosisNumber of days from CRC diagnosis to the date of evaluation for CRC treatment among subjects who received study Intervention (Age Group 50-75) and subjects who did not receive study intervention (Usual Care - Age Group 50-75) using electronic health record data to ascertain the dates of CRC diagnosis and evaluation for CRC treatment.
Number of Subjects Who Received Referral for Cancer TreatmentUp to 6 months after cancer diagnosis dateNumber of subjects who received study Intervention (Age Group 50-75) and did not receive intervention (Age Group 50-75) who received referral for cancer treatment among individuals diagnosed with CRC per electronic health record review.
Number of Subjects Mailed FITs Completed After Two Rounds of Annual FIT OutreachRound 1 time frame: at 6 months after randomization; Round 2 time frame: at 6 months after determining eligibility for Round 2"Number of annual FIT screenings completed (0, 1, or 2) by subjects who received Intervention (Age Group 50-75) after two annual rounds of mailed FIT outreach per electronic health record review.
Incremental Cost of Each Additional Patient Screened in the Intervention Arm Compared to Usual Care (Trial - Age Group 50-75)Through study completion, up to 36 months after randomizationComparison of the programmatic costs incurred and number of subjects screened in Arm 1(Trial Mailed FIT Intervention - Age Group 50-75) compared to Arm 2 (Trial Usual Care - Age Group 50-75), measured as cost of intervention minus the cost of usual care, divided by the number screened in Arm 1 minus the number screened in Arm 2. Intervention costs will be assessed using periodic episodes of direct observation of mailed FIT outreach activities, time logs maintained by the intervention team, and assembly of administrative data capturing non-personnel/non-labor expenditures, such as costs associated with materials printing, FIT processing, and mailing costs. Usual care costs will be assessed using a combination of clinic observations and interviews with staff.
The Proportion of Subjects, Ages 45-49, Who Are Current With CRC ScreeningUp to 6 months after randomizationThe proportion of subjects in Arm 3 (Sub-study Mailed FIT Intervention Enhanced Envelope - Age Group 45-49) and Arm 4 (Sub-study Mailed FIT Active Comparator Envelope - Age Group 45-49) who are current with any CRC screening compared to baseline, using any of the screening modalities recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (FIT, fecal occult blood test \[FOBT\], FIT-DNA, colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy with FIT, CT colonography) per electronic health record review.
Proportion of Subjects, Ages 45-49, Who Completed Mailed FIT at 60 Days60 days after randomizationThe proportion of subjects in Arm 3 (Intervention Enhanced Envelope - Age Group 45-49) compared to subjects in Arm 4 (Intervention Active Comparator Envelope - Age Group 45-49) who returned a completed FIT.
Proportion of Subjects Who Completed a Follow-up (Diagnostic) ColonoscopyUp to 6 months after diagnostic colonoscopy referral dateThe proportion of subjects who received study Intervention (Age Group 50-75) and did not receive study information (Usual Care only - Age Group 50-75), who had a positive (abnormal) FIT/FOBT result, and for whom colonoscopy was deemed to be clinically appropriate by the subject's provider, who completed follow-up (diagnostic) colonoscopy per electronic health record review.
Proportion of Subjects Who Completed a Follow up (Diagnostic) ColonoscopyUp to 6 months after abnormal FIT result dateThe proportion of subjects in Arm 3 (Sub-study Mailed FIT Intervention Enhanced Envelope - Age Group 45-49) and Arm 4 (Sub-study Mailed FIT Active Comparator Plain Envelope - Age Group 45-40) with a positive (abnormal) FIT/FOBT result for whom colonoscopy is deemed to be clinically appropriate by the subject's provider who completes a follow-up (diagnostic) colonoscopy per electronic health record review.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDaniel S Reuland, MD

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Subjects were enrolled between 07/07/2020 - 02/28/2022 in one center in North Carolina.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental: Trial Mailed FIT - Age Group 50-75
Subjects randomized to this arm are 50-75 years of age and eligible for CRC screening using FIT per electronic health record at either of the two study sites. This arm receives a mailed FIT and up to two reminder letters.
2,001
No Intervention: Trial Usual Care - Age Group 50-75
Subjects randomized to this arm are 50-75 years of age and eligible for CRC screening using FIT per electronic health record at either of the two study sites. This arm receives the usual care.
2,001
Experimental: Sub-study Mailed FIT Age Group 45-49 Enhanced Envelope
Subjects randomized to this arm are 45-49 years of age and eligible for CRC screening using FIT per electronic health record at one study site. This arm receives a mailed FIT in an enhanced mailing envelope and up to two reminder letters.
158
Active Comparator: Sub-study Mailed FIT Comparator Plain Envelope - Age Group 45-49
Subjects randomized to this arm are 45-49 years of age and eligible for CRC screening using FIT per electronic health record at one study site. This arm receives a mailed FIT in a plain envelope and up to two reminder letters.
158
Total4,318

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalExperimental: Trial Mailed FIT - Age Group 50-75No Intervention: Trial Usual Care - Age Group 50-75Experimental: Sub-study Mailed FIT Age Group 45-49 Enhanced EnvelopeActive Comparator: Sub-study Mailed FIT Comparator Plain Envelope - Age Group 45-49
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1019 Participants514 Participants505 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3299 Participants1487 Participants1496 Participants158 Participants158 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
389 Participants185 Participants179 Participants13 Participants12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
3652 Participants1687 Participants1679 Participants141 Participants145 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
277 Participants129 Participants143 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
15 Participants4 Participants8 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
30 Participants17 Participants10 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1269 Participants549 Participants536 Participants88 Participants96 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
5 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
338 Participants156 Participants151 Participants18 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2661 Participants1272 Participants1295 Participants50 Participants44 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
4318 Participants2001 Participants2001 Participants158 Participants158 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2437 Participants1135 Participants1121 Participants84 Participants97 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1881 Participants866 Participants880 Participants74 Participants61 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Subjects Who Completed Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Within 6 Months (Trial - Age Group 50-75)

The proportion of subjects who received study Intervention (Age Group 50-75) and did not receive study intervention (Usual Care - Age Group 50-75 who completed CRC screening using any of the screening modalities recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force per electronic health record review. Fecal immunochemical test (FIT), fecal occult blood test \[FOBT\], fecal immunochemical test - deoxyribonucleic acid (FIT-DNA), colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy with FIT, Computerized Tomography colonography.

Time frame: Up to 6 months after randomization

Population: Subjects who actively receive health care from the study sites, aged between 50-75.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Trial Mailed FIT Intervention - Age Group 50-75Proportion of Subjects Who Completed Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Within 6 Months (Trial - Age Group 50-75)598 Participants
Trial Usual Care - Age Group 50-75Proportion of Subjects Who Completed Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Within 6 Months (Trial - Age Group 50-75)192 Participants
Secondary

Incremental Cost of Each Additional Patient Screened in the Intervention Arm Compared to Usual Care (Trial - Age Group 50-75)

Comparison of the programmatic costs incurred and number of subjects screened in Arm 1(Trial Mailed FIT Intervention - Age Group 50-75) compared to Arm 2 (Trial Usual Care - Age Group 50-75), measured as cost of intervention minus the cost of usual care, divided by the number screened in Arm 1 minus the number screened in Arm 2. Intervention costs will be assessed using periodic episodes of direct observation of mailed FIT outreach activities, time logs maintained by the intervention team, and assembly of administrative data capturing non-personnel/non-labor expenditures, such as costs associated with materials printing, FIT processing, and mailing costs. Usual care costs will be assessed using a combination of clinic observations and interviews with staff.

Time frame: Through study completion, up to 36 months after randomization

Secondary

Number of Days From CRC Diagnosis to the Date of Evaluation for CRC Treatment

Number of days from CRC diagnosis to the date of evaluation for CRC treatment among subjects who received study Intervention (Age Group 50-75) and subjects who did not receive study intervention (Usual Care - Age Group 50-75) using electronic health record data to ascertain the dates of CRC diagnosis and evaluation for CRC treatment.

Time frame: Up to 12 months after CRC diagnosis

Population: Participants were diagnosed with CRC ever during Round 1. Five subjects from Trial Mailed FIT Intervention - Age Group 50-75 and 2 subjects from Trial Usual Care - Age Group 50-75 were evaluated for treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Trial Mailed FIT Intervention - Age Group 50-75Number of Days From CRC Diagnosis to the Date of Evaluation for CRC Treatment3.25 days
Trial Usual Care - Age Group 50-75Number of Days From CRC Diagnosis to the Date of Evaluation for CRC Treatment0 days
Secondary

Number of Subject Colorectal Carcinoma (CRC) and Advanced Adenomas Detected at 12 Months

Number of CRCs and advanced adenomas detected among subjects who received study Intervention (Age Group 50-75) and subjects who did not receive study intervention (Usual Care only - Age Group 50-75) per electronic health record review.

Time frame: Up to 12 months after screening or diagnostic colonoscopy result date

Population: Subjects who participated to the study and were diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Trial Mailed FIT Intervention - Age Group 50-75Number of Subject Colorectal Carcinoma (CRC) and Advanced Adenomas Detected at 12 Months22 Participants
Trial Usual Care - Age Group 50-75Number of Subject Colorectal Carcinoma (CRC) and Advanced Adenomas Detected at 12 Months8 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects Mailed FITs Completed After Two Rounds of Annual FIT Outreach

Number of annual FIT screenings completed (0, 1, or 2) by subjects who received Intervention (Age Group 50-75) after two annual rounds of mailed FIT outreach per electronic health record review.

Time frame: Round 1 time frame: at 6 months after randomization; Round 2 time frame: at 6 months after determining eligibility for Round 2

Population: Subjects who are 50-75 years old received study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Trial Mailed FIT Intervention - Age Group 50-75Number of Subjects Mailed FITs Completed After Two Rounds of Annual FIT Outreach1372 Participants
Trial Usual Care - Age Group 50-75Number of Subjects Mailed FITs Completed After Two Rounds of Annual FIT Outreach261 Participants
Completed 1 Annual FIT Screening Only in Year 2Number of Subjects Mailed FITs Completed After Two Rounds of Annual FIT Outreach116 Participants
Completed 2 Annual FIT Screenings in Year 1 and Year 2Number of Subjects Mailed FITs Completed After Two Rounds of Annual FIT Outreach252 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects Who Received Referral for Cancer Treatment

Number of subjects who received study Intervention (Age Group 50-75) and did not receive intervention (Age Group 50-75) who received referral for cancer treatment among individuals diagnosed with CRC per electronic health record review.

Time frame: Up to 6 months after cancer diagnosis date

Population: Subjects who received a referral for cancer treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Trial Mailed FIT Intervention - Age Group 50-75Number of Subjects Who Received Referral for Cancer Treatment4 Participants
Trial Usual Care - Age Group 50-75Number of Subjects Who Received Referral for Cancer Treatment2 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects, Ages 45-49, Who Completed Mailed FIT at 60 Days

The proportion of subjects in Arm 3 (Intervention Enhanced Envelope - Age Group 45-49) compared to subjects in Arm 4 (Intervention Active Comparator Envelope - Age Group 45-49) who returned a completed FIT.

Time frame: 60 days after randomization

Population: Subjects who are between 45-49 old completed mailed FIT at 60 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Trial Mailed FIT Intervention - Age Group 50-75Proportion of Subjects, Ages 45-49, Who Completed Mailed FIT at 60 Days34 Participants
Trial Usual Care - Age Group 50-75Proportion of Subjects, Ages 45-49, Who Completed Mailed FIT at 60 Days20 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects Who Completed a Follow up (Diagnostic) Colonoscopy

The proportion of subjects in Arm 3 (Sub-study Mailed FIT Intervention Enhanced Envelope - Age Group 45-49) and Arm 4 (Sub-study Mailed FIT Active Comparator Plain Envelope - Age Group 45-40) with a positive (abnormal) FIT/FOBT result for whom colonoscopy is deemed to be clinically appropriate by the subject's provider who completes a follow-up (diagnostic) colonoscopy per electronic health record review.

Time frame: Up to 6 months after abnormal FIT result date

Population: Subjects who are 45-49 years old completed study intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Trial Mailed FIT Intervention - Age Group 50-75Proportion of Subjects Who Completed a Follow up (Diagnostic) Colonoscopypositive (abnormal) FIT/FOBT result2 Participants
Trial Mailed FIT Intervention - Age Group 50-75Proportion of Subjects Who Completed a Follow up (Diagnostic) Colonoscopycompleted a follow-up colonoscopy2 Participants
Trial Usual Care - Age Group 50-75Proportion of Subjects Who Completed a Follow up (Diagnostic) Colonoscopypositive (abnormal) FIT/FOBT result1 Participants
Trial Usual Care - Age Group 50-75Proportion of Subjects Who Completed a Follow up (Diagnostic) Colonoscopycompleted a follow-up colonoscopy1 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects Who Completed a Follow-up (Diagnostic) Colonoscopy

The proportion of subjects who received study Intervention (Age Group 50-75) and did not receive study information (Usual Care only - Age Group 50-75), who had a positive (abnormal) FIT/FOBT result, and for whom colonoscopy was deemed to be clinically appropriate by the subject's provider, who completed follow-up (diagnostic) colonoscopy per electronic health record review.

Time frame: Up to 6 months after diagnostic colonoscopy referral date

Population: Subjects who started the study and were assessed for colon carcinoma within 6 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Trial Mailed FIT Intervention - Age Group 50-75Proportion of Subjects Who Completed a Follow-up (Diagnostic) ColonoscopyAbnormal FIT48 Participants
Trial Mailed FIT Intervention - Age Group 50-75Proportion of Subjects Who Completed a Follow-up (Diagnostic) ColonoscopyCompleted colonoscopy33 Participants
Trial Usual Care - Age Group 50-75Proportion of Subjects Who Completed a Follow-up (Diagnostic) ColonoscopyAbnormal FIT18 Participants
Trial Usual Care - Age Group 50-75Proportion of Subjects Who Completed a Follow-up (Diagnostic) ColonoscopyCompleted colonoscopy8 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects Who Returned a Completed Mailed FIT at 60 Days

The proportion of subjects who received study Intervention (Age Group - 50-75) and returned a completed FIT per electronic health record review.

Time frame: Up to 60 days after randomization

Population: Subjects who actively receive health care from the study sites, aged between 50-75.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Trial Mailed FIT Intervention - Age Group 50-75Proportion of Subjects Who Returned a Completed Mailed FIT at 60 Days409 Participants
Secondary

The Proportion of Subjects, Ages 45-49, Who Are Current With CRC Screening

The proportion of subjects in Arm 3 (Sub-study Mailed FIT Intervention Enhanced Envelope - Age Group 45-49) and Arm 4 (Sub-study Mailed FIT Active Comparator Envelope - Age Group 45-49) who are current with any CRC screening compared to baseline, using any of the screening modalities recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (FIT, fecal occult blood test \[FOBT\], FIT-DNA, colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy with FIT, CT colonography) per electronic health record review.

Time frame: Up to 6 months after randomization

Population: Screening-eligible population, aged 45-49 years old.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Trial Mailed FIT Intervention - Age Group 50-75The Proportion of Subjects, Ages 45-49, Who Are Current With CRC ScreeningScreening-eligible population, aged 45-49 years old158 Participants
Trial Mailed FIT Intervention - Age Group 50-75The Proportion of Subjects, Ages 45-49, Who Are Current With CRC ScreeningCount of screened participants53 Participants
Trial Usual Care - Age Group 50-75The Proportion of Subjects, Ages 45-49, Who Are Current With CRC ScreeningScreening-eligible population, aged 45-49 years old158 Participants
Trial Usual Care - Age Group 50-75The Proportion of Subjects, Ages 45-49, Who Are Current With CRC ScreeningCount of screened participants45 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 22, 2026