Skip to content

The Use of Proximal Carpal Row Versus Iliac Crest as Bone Graft in Total Wrist Fusion

The Use of Proximal Carpal Row Versus Iliac Crest Bone Graft in Total Wrist Fusion - a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial Comparing Two Operative Techniques (PROOF II - Trial)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04403958
Acronym
PROOF II
Enrollment
84
Registered
2020-05-27
Start date
2021-09-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2021-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fusion; Joint, Wrist Arthritis

Brief summary

Study purpose is to compare the outcome after total wrist arthrodesis (TWA) with proximal carpal row (Proximal Row Carpectomy = PRC) as bone graft versus iliac crest cancellous bone graft. Patients with radiologically and clinically confirmed advanced osteoarthritis are randomized (1:1 computer generated sequence with random block size) to two parallel groups and will undergo either total wrist arthrodesis with PRC or TWA with iliac crest bone grafting. Baseline data is collected preoperatively and is a follow-up visits at every 6 weeks after the surgery is arranged until the wrist is fused. The primary end-point is 6 months and the primary outcome is fusion rate.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPRC

Total wrist arthrodesis with dorsal plate using proximal row of the wrist as bone graft

PROCEDURETWA

Total wrist arthrodesis with dorsal plate using iliac crest as bone graft

Sponsors

Turku University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Kymenlaakso Central Hospital Kotka Finland
CollaboratorOTHER
Töölö Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 - 75 * Symptom duration \> 3 months * American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I-III * Fluent in written and spoken Finnish

Exclusion criteria

* Age \<18 or \>75 years * Rheumatoid arthritis * Heavy smoking (\> 20 cigarettes per day) * Condition or medication affecting bony healing (eg diabetes mellitus with poor glycemic control, malnutrition, use of per oral corticosteroids) * Ulnar variance \> 1 mm * Wrist pain treatable with partial wrist fusion * Previous partial wrist fusion * Alcohol or drug abuse * Neurological condition affecting upper limb function * Less than 6 months after another operation of the same upper limb

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Fusion rate (percent)6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)6 monthsThe PRWE comprises 15 questions to measure wrist pain and disability in daily activities. In PRWE patients rate wrist pain and disability from 0 to 10 and it consists two subscales: Pain and Function (0=best possible outcome, 10=worst possible outcome)
Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH)6 monthsThe QuickDASH is self-reported questionnaire and shortened version of DASH outcome measure to measure physical function and symptoms in people with any or multiple musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb in 11 dimensions in 1-5 scale (1=best possible outcome, 5=worst possible outcome)
Global improvement6 monthsGlobal rating to treatment effect will be evaluated by question: How would you rate the function of your hand compared to the situation before the treatment?. The options are in 5-step Likert scale from (-2) Much worse to (+2) Much better
Pain (Visual Analogue Scale)6 monthsThe VAS is derived by health care professional question of pain in scale 0 to 100 mm (0 mm =no pain, 100 mm =worst possible pain)
Operative timePerioperativeOperative time is measured in minutes for time in the operation theatre and time used for surgery
Complications12 monthsIncidence of complications (i.e. non-union, fracture, re-operation, infection, hematoma, iatrogenic tendon/nerve/arterial injury, complex regional pain syndrome) is recorded and compared between study groups.
Grip strength6 monthsGrip strength is measured with a dynamometer in kg as the mean of three measurements. It will be numbered in kg and percentage of the unaffected side

Contacts

Primary ContactSamuli Aspinen, M.D., Ph.D.
samuli.aspinen@hus.fi+358406360546
Backup ContactJorma Ryhänen, adj. prof.
jorma.ryhanen@hus.fi

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026