Fallopian Tube Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Ovarian Neoplasm, Ovarian Neoplasm Epithelial, Peritoneal Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
MIRRORS Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery, Role in Optimal Debulking Ovarian Cancer, Recovery & Survival is a new United Kingdom based prospective feasibility study the purpose of which is to establish the feasibility of launching a British multicentre randomised control trial of Robotic interval debulking surgery for ovarian cancer (including cancer of the fallopian tube & peritoneum) in the future. This initial feasibility study will focus on the ability to recruit patients, acceptability, quality of life, the rate at which it is possible to remove all visible tumour and the rate of conversion to open surgery. Ultimately the investigators would like to determine whether, in selected patients, robotic surgery offers improved quality of life and recovery with equivalent overall and progression free survival. Robotic surgery is unlikely to be suitable in all cases of ovarian cancer, particularly those with large pelvic masses or extensive disease around the upper part of the abdomen, however, it has the potential to provide significant recovery and quality of life benefits to a selected group of patients. MIRRORS - ICG Peritoneal angiography / perfusion assessment using Indocyanine green (ICG) in patients with advanced ovarian cancers is a ancillary study within MIRRORS. Using ICG dye, the investigators aim to observe whether there are any changes in the blood vessel pattern associated with the tumour deposits the investigators remove that makes them distinctive. The ICG will not be used to guide where biopsies are taken or tissue is removed. Participation in this ancillary research is not required for participation in the trial.
Detailed description
Hypothesis: in selected cases of ovarian cancer, following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, minimally invasive robotic surgery provides maximal debulking surgery and improved patient outcomes. Null Hypothesis: Robotic surgery is not suitable for the treatment of ovarian cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. It is not possible to achieve maximal debulking surgery and patient outcomes are not improved. To assess the feasibility of obtaining consent from women and acceptability of Robotic interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. Women deemed suitable for interval debulking surgery will be identified through the Gynaecological Oncology multidisciplinary team meeting. The aim is to recruit women over a period of 1 year aiming for a total of 20 women who undergo Minimally Invasive Robotic Interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. The main outcomes are feasibility of the recruitment process and acceptability of the questionnaires and numeric rating pain scale (NRS11) as assessed by completion rate and patient interviews. In order to be able to offer MIRRORS to as many patients as possible the investigators have kept the inclusion criteria wide, not restricting by Body Mass Index (BMI), patient comorbidities or Ca125 level.
Interventions
PROCEDURERobotic Interval Debulking Surgery
Interval debulking surgery carried out in a minimally invasive manner using the Da Vinci Robot.
Sponsors
Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Adult women ≥18 years with Stage IIIc -IVb Ovarian cancer (including fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer) undergoing Neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy. Considered suitable for Interval debulking surgery ≤8cm pelvic mass MIRRORS ICG Inclusion Criteria - Same as above
Exclusion criteria
Pelvic mass \>8cm, open surgical approach considered necessary following MDT review. Lacking capacity to the extent they are unable to understand or complete trial documentation / questionnaires. MIRRORS ICG
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Recruitment | Assessed at 1 year (recruitment period) | Number of patients consented compared to the number identified by multidisciplinary team as eligible for inclusion in the study expressed as a percentage. Success criteria: At least 20% of people eligible for the study will accept inclusion in the study. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mental wellbeing | 3 months post surgery | Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) A (Anxiety) and D (Depression) scores are calculated separately. 0-7 = Normal, 8-10 = Borderline, 11-21 = Abnormal (case) |
| Pain assessment | 3 months post surgery | Numeric rating scale (NRS11) 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain) |
| Surgical complications | Assessed at close of trial - 15 months +/- 7 days (recruitment + follow up period period) (Quarterly reports to be submitted to sponsor) | Intraoperative complications will be recorded. Post operative complications will be recorded and classified by Clavien-Dindo Classification. Success criteria: Complication rate is not higher than for open interval debulking surgery |
| Rate of Conversion to open surgery | Assessed at 1 year 3 months (once last recruited patient has undergone surgery) | Percentage of patients converted to open surgery after being deemed suitable for Robotic interval debulking surgery following initial diagnostic laparoscopy. Success criteria: Conversion to open surgery rate not greater than 50% in patient group deemed suitable for Robotic interval debulking surgery following initial diagnostic laparoscopy. |
| Quality of Life following Surgery | 3 months post surgery | Assessed using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Validated quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) for ovarian cancer (QLQ-C30/QLQ-OV28). This validated questionnaire consists of the core module and its associated ovarian cancer specific module. |
| Overall Survival | Assessed at close of trial - 15 months +/- 7 days (recruitment + follow up period period) reassessed at 5 years to maximum of 10 years | Measured in Months from the date of surgery. In order to follow up long-term survival in participants suffering from ovarian cancer and subsequently correlate this to the research findings it is necessary to store minimal personal data after completion of the study this is detailed in documentation submitted and approved by London - Riverside Research Ethics Committee. |
| Progression free survival | Assessed at close of trial - 15 months +/- 7 days (recruitment + follow up period period) reassessed at 5 years to maximum of 10 years | Measured in Months from the date of surgery until the date of first documented progression. In order to follow up progression free survival in participants suffering from ovarian cancer and subsequently correlate this to the research findings it is necessary to store minimal personal data after completion of the study this is detailed in documentation submitted and approved by London - Riverside Research Ethics Committee. |
| Cost | Assessed at close of trial - 15 months +/- 7 days (recruitment + follow up period period) | Cost of Robotic minimally invasive interval debulking surgery to the hospital compared to a similar open procedure measured in British Pound (GBP) £ |
| Robotic interval debulking - Maximal Macroscopic debulking rate (R=0 rate) | Assessed at 1 year 3 months (once last recruited patient has undergone surgery) | Percentage of patients undergoing robotic interval debulking surgery who achieve Maximal macroscopic debulking i.e. no macroscopic residual disease present (R=0 rate) |
Countries
United Kingdom
Contacts
Primary ContactChristina M Uwins, MRCS MRCOG
Backup ContactKate Penhaligon
Outcome results
None listed