Skip to content

The Effect of Mechanical Bowel Preparation Prior to Gynaecological Laparoscopic Surgeries on the Surgical Conditions

The Effect of Mechanical Bowel Preparation Prior to Gynaecological Laparoscopic Surgeries on the Pressure of Pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg Inclination Angle During the Surgery: A Novel Perspective for Patient Safety

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04400669
Enrollment
160
Registered
2020-05-22
Start date
2020-06-05
Completion date
2021-11-20
Last updated
2021-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patient Preference, Patient Safety

Keywords

mechanical bowel preparation, gynecological surgery, Minimally invasive gynecological procedures, Enema, Trendelenburg angle, Pneumoperitoneum pressure

Brief summary

This RCT aims to investigate the real surgical effects of MBP prior to the gynecological laparoscopic surgeries. Those effects include lowest pneumoperitoneum pressure, lowest Trendelenburg inclination angle, the ease of the surgical view and the preferences of the patients with objective measures.

Detailed description

Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) has been routinely used prior to minimally invasive gynaecologic procedures (MIGP) hypothetically to improve intraoperative bowel handling and visualization of the surgical field, and also to reduce faecal contamination in the setting of bowel injury and/or resection. The studies investigating the effect of MBP on MIGP are limited and most of existing data are extrapolated from the reports of colorectal and urological surgery studies. Besides, evaluation of the surgical workspace visualization and intraoperative bowel handling are far from being objective since they were mostly measured by a 4/5/10-point Likert scales or rated verbally on scales of excellent to poor by the operating surgeons. In contrary, it is planned to use objective visualize index, and objective surgical conditions to measure whether MBP has any effect or not.

Interventions

oral sodium phosphate (NaP) enema

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTLow fibre diet

3 days

OTHERMBP plus low-fibre diet

3 days low fibre diet preoperative mechanical bowel preparation

Sponsors

Ondokuz Mayıs University
CollaboratorOTHER
Sehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank Sancaktepe Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Surgeons and the assessor will be blind. The nurse working in the gynecology setting perform the intervention to the previously randomized patients. Patient will be told for not to reveal the intervention that she undergoes.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18 years and older * Able to provide informed consent * Undergo laparoscopic gynecological surgery for a benign condition

Exclusion criteria

* History of previous abdominal surgery * Clinically significant present or past systemic diseases * Inability to perform mechanical bowel preparation * Suspicion of malignancy * Association with non-gynaecological surgical pathologies * Severe endometriosis (stage ≥ III according to the classification of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine) * Psychiatric disorders precluding consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The surgical visibility of abdomenAfter the introduce of first left lateral portA scale title as Objective Visual Indexing (OVI) will be used for assessing the visibility of the Douglas pouch and adnexa. The assessment of the visibility of Douglas pouch and adnexa will be performed under standard pneumoperitoneum pressure (12mmHg) and Trendelenburg inclincation angle (30). After the first Inspection, scale of VI scoring will be calculated by adding up the points obtained from optical inspection. Higher scores mean better visuality of the surgical field.
The lowest pneumoperitoneum pressure (PP) at standard Trendelenburg inclination angle (TIA).In the initial phase of the surgeryThe PP will be increased to 15 mmHg while keeping the TIA same, at 30o. The surgeon will displace the bowel beginning from the cecum followed by the last ileal loop above the sacral promontory. Once the bowel was displaced out of the pelvis, the PP will be stepwise decreased by 1 mmHg during 1 min intervals to the lowest pressure where the bowel is to descend towards the pelvis over the pelvic brim and/or where the surgical workspace is not adequate to proceed safely with the planned operation. This value will be recorded as the lowest PP adequate to proceed safely with the planned surgery at standard TIA (30 degree).
The lowest Trendelenburg inclination angle (TIA) at standard pneumoperitoneum pressure (PP) adequate to proceed with the planned operation.In the initial phase of the surgeryThe PP obtained in outcome 2 will be readjusted to the standard 12 mmHg keeping the TIA same, at 300. Then, the surgeon will replace the bowel beginning from the cecum followed by the last ileal loop above the sacral promontory. Once the bowel is displaced out of the pelvis, the TIA will be gradually decreased by 1o with 15 seconds intervals to the degree where the bowel is to descend towards the pelvis over the pelvic brim. This value will be recorded as the lowest TIA adequate to proceed safely with the planned surgery at standard PP (12 mmHg).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Preoperative patient symptomatologyRight before the surgeryPatients will be interviewed in the preoperative holding area or in the patient's room about the acceptability of the intervention (MBP / diet) and adverse pre-operative events, including: nausea, insomnia, headache, thirst, weakness, tiredness, discomfort, abdominal cramps, sleep disturbances. These symptoms will be scored with using a 10-cm Visual Analog Score (VAS). Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Postoperative painat 24th hoursThe intensity of the postoperative pain was measured by an independent investigator at 24th hours with a 10-cm Visual Analog Score (VAS). Higher scores mean worse outcome.
ComplicationsAt 1st week and 6th week postoperatively or whenever it occurred.Intraoperative complications, at 1st week and 6th week postoperatively, between the groups.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactUzeyir Kalkan, M.D.
uzekal@hotmail.com+905428102539

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026