Skip to content

Prophylactic Muscle Flaps in Vascular Surgery

Prophylactic Muscle Flaps for the Prevention of Vascular Graft Infection After Groin Dissection

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04399044
Enrollment
5
Registered
2020-05-22
Start date
2020-10-16
Completion date
2021-02-26
Last updated
2024-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vascular Graft Infection

Brief summary

Previous studies have suggested that prophylactic muscle coverage in high-risk patients undergoing revascularization procedures through a groin incision have the potential to reduce rates of complications and re-operation. This is a prospective randomized control trial to test this hypothesis at the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics.

Detailed description

The incidence of graft infections after groin dissection for lower limb revascularization is estimated to be between 2 and 20%. Infection requiring re-operation and muscle flap coverage for salvage is estimated to be between 11 and 13%. Retrospective studies have endeavored to create risk calculators to better predict patients at high risk of need for muscle flap salvage. Fischer et al. suggest that in high-risk patients, prophylactic muscle flaps can reduce complications from 70% to 10%, rates of infection from 70% to 3% and wound breakdown from 48% to 5%. Cost-savings of around $400,000 per year with the use of prophylactic muscle flaps are estimated. Unfortunately, the retrospective nature of the Fischer et al. study, lack of standardization of patients receiving prophylactic muscle flaps, and use of the same cohort for the risk calculator as for the outcomes analysis all reduce the generalizability and reproducibility of these results. At the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, muscle coverage is routinely used in cases of infection or lymph leak but is not systematically used in prophylactic settings. This is because it is generally left to surgeon preference-if they feel like a muscle flap is needed (for a variety of non-standardized anatomic/surgical or patient factors) then it is performed. Muscle coverage of vascular grafts in and of itself is not an experimental procedure and has been performed for decades. The goal of this study is to determine whether prophylactic muscle flaps in high-risk patients can a) reduce the rates of infection requiring re-operation, and b) reduce the significant morbidity associated with other non-operative complications. This will be the first prospective, randomized control trial to address this issue.

Interventions

PROCEDUREProphylactic muscle flap

A muscle flap refers to taking an expendable muscle with its vascular supply and moving it to a new area. In this case, the investigators will take a muscle from the leg or abdomen that is redundant (other muscles perform the same function) and moving it to cover vascular grafts to provide healthy tissue to prevent infection.

Sponsors

University of Wisconsin, Madison
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Open lower extremity arterial revascularization * Groin incision * High-risk patients based on risk calculation

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or breast-feeding * Any person with diagnosis of an active groin infection preoperatively * Incarcerated patients * Unstable patients going directly to the OR for whom the study consent process would delay care, and those who cannot give informed consent to participate in the research study will be excluded * If a surgeon feels that a patient should or should not receive a flap based on intra-operative or pre-operative characteristics, those patients will be excluded from the study * Prior to a scheduled groin intervention case a prior authorization will be sent to the participant's insurance company. If the groin flap is denied, which would be highly unusual, then the participant would be excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Graft Infection Requiring Re-operationwithin 1 yearInfection of the vascular graft as determined by clinical diagnosis which requires re-operation for washout or other indicated procedures

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Seroma1 yearFluid collection over the vascular graft
Incidence of Lymphocele1 yearCollection of lymph fluid over vascular graft/operative field
Incidence of Wound Dehiscence1yearIncision breakdown that is managed with wound cares and does not require operative debridement
Toronto Lower Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) at 3 months3 monthsThis is a 32-item survey of activities commonly performed in daily life, each item scored on a 5 point likert scale where 1 is 'impossible to do' and 5 is 'not at all difficult'. The total possible range of scores is 32 to 160 where higher scores indicate less difficulty in performing tasks. Scores are often standardized to a 100-point scale to account for unanswered questions (referring to activities that they do not normally perform in everyday life).
Toronto Lower Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) at 6 months6 monthsThis is a 32-item survey of activities commonly performed in daily life, each item scored on a 5 point likert scale where 1 is 'impossible to do' and 5 is 'not at all difficult'. The total possible range of scores is 32 to 160 where higher scores indicate less difficulty in performing tasks. Scores are often standardized to a 100-point scale to account for unanswered questions (referring to activities that they do not normally perform in everyday life).
Incidence of Infection Not Requiring Re-operation1 yearSuperficial infections treated with antibiotics alone or local wound cares
Toronto Lower Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) at 12 months12 monthsThis is a 32-item survey of activities commonly performed in daily life, each item scored on a 5 point likert scale where 1 is 'impossible to do' and 5 is 'not at all difficult'. The total possible range of scores is 32 to 160 where higher scores indicate less difficulty in performing tasks. Scores are often standardized to a 100-point scale to account for unanswered questions (referring to activities that they do not normally perform in everyday life).
Readmission rates30- and 90-daysRates of re-hospitalization after the index revascularization
Total cost of hospitalizations for index diagnosis1 year
Number of clinic visits after index surgery1 year
Death1 year
Toronto Lower Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) at 9 months9 monthsThis is a 32-item survey of activities commonly performed in daily life, each item scored on a 5 point likert scale where 1 is 'impossible to do' and 5 is 'not at all difficult'. The total possible range of scores is 32 to 160 where higher scores indicate less difficulty in performing tasks. Scores are often standardized to a 100-point scale to account for unanswered questions (referring to activities that they do not normally perform in everyday life).

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026