Cholecystitis, Postoperative Pain
Conditions
Keywords
robot cholecystectomy, low-pressure pneumoperitoneum, postoperative pain
Brief summary
This study showed the difference in postoperative pain between the groups that performed surgery with the low-pressure pneumoperitoneum and the group that performed surgery in the standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum when robotic single-hole cholecystectomy was performed. The primary purpose of the study was to compare the differences in the visual analog scale (VAS) between the two groups and to demonstrate the effectiveness of pain relief after surgery. Secondly, the effect of the low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on the patient's postoperative recovery and outcome was compared with the control group by comparing the length of stay, operation time, and postoperative complications.
Detailed description
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was the most common treatment method for gallbladder-related diseases, and robotic cholecystectomy was also currently being performed. Many patients complained pain around the wound, shoulder and back after surgery. Several methods had been attempted to reduce postoperative pain, previous studies showed that oral medications such as NSAIDS, administration of local anesthetics in wounds and abdominal cavity, low-pressure penumoperitoneum, humidification of intraperitoneal washing fluid, And active residual gas suction in the abdominal cavity had been found to relieve postoperative pain. Robotic cholecystectomy, similar to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, also formed pneumoperitoneum to secure the surgical space during operation. Based on the results published in various studies, it had known that the most effective method of pain relief for laparoscopic pain was to create low-pressure pneumoperitoneum. In this study, investigators attempted to prove the effectiveness of low pressure pneumoperioneum through a prospective randomized controlled trial between the experimental group with the low-pressure pneumoperitoneum and the control group with the standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum during robotic single-hole cholecystectomy.
Interventions
PROCEDURErobotic single port cholecystectomy
1. Local anesthetic administration during wound incision In the experimental group and the control group, a local anesthetic was administered to the wound surface when a glove port was installed on the navel at the start of surgery. (bupivacaine 0.5% 14ml subcutaneous injection) 2. Residual gas aspiration 3. Pulmonary recruitment maneuver In both the experimental group and the control group, before the operation was completed and the wound was closed, the patient was taken to the Trenedelenburg position, and then the pressure of 60 cm H2o in the abdomen was applied, and manual inflation was performed twice, 5 seconds at a time, and pulmonary recruitment was performed. 4. Warming of the washing solution in the abdominal cavity
Sponsors
Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Patients who underwent elective gallbladder surgery * Cholelithiasis * Chronic cholecystitis * Gallbladder polyps * Gallbladder adenoma * Porcelain gallbladder
Exclusion criteria
1. Acute cholecystitis patient group * Necrotic gallbladder * Collapsed gallbladder * Gallbladder pustosis * Gallbladder emphysema * Hemorrhagic gallbladder * Perforated gallbladder 2. cholecystitis with a gallbladder thickness of 4 mm or more on CT or ultrasound 3. cholecystitis with adhesions to surrounding organs due to inflammation of the gallbladder 4. Patient group performing surgery concurrently due to other organ diseases 5. Immunosuppressive patient group * Transplant patient group: Liver transplant patient group (PSLT), Kidney transplant patient group (PSKT) * AIDS patients group 6. Patient group with history of open abdominal surgery 7. Transplant group during open surgery 8. Patients under 19 years of age.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Analogue Score(VAS) | 24 hours after surgery | The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| postoperative complication | Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 days | postoperative complication : bile leakage, atelectasis, pneumonia, wound infection, bleeding, etc.. |
| hospital stay | Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 days | hospital stay(days) : The duration between the operation day and the day of discharge |
| operation time | Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 days | operation time(minutes) |
Countries
South Korea
Contacts
Primary ContactTae ho Hong, MD. PhD
Backup ContactSung eun Park, MD
Outcome results
None listed