Skip to content

Surgery for Lower Rectum Deep Endometriosis (Segmental/Disc) - Prospective Comparison of Digestive Symptoms and Pain

Surgery for Deep Endometriosis of the Lower Rectum (Segmental/Disc) - a Prospective Comparison of Surgical Techniques Regarding Pre- and Postoperative Digestive Symptoms and Pain Outcomes

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04398641
Enrollment
300
Registered
2020-05-21
Start date
2020-07-01
Completion date
2022-05-01
Last updated
2021-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometriosis, Rectum

Keywords

Bowel endometriosis, Deep endometriosis (DE), Transanal disc excision (TADE), Nerve and vessel sparing segmental resection (NVSSR), Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS), Digestive complaints, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) by Eypasch

Brief summary

Several studies show a significant drop in pain scores, improved fertility outcomes and amelioration of impaired sexual functioning in women following surgical resection of colorectal endometriosis. However, intermediate and long-term bowel dysfunction may occur as a consequence of radical surgery with typical symptoms such as constipation, feeling of incomplete evacuation, clustering of stools and urgency. This is described as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). The primary aim of this study is the prospective comparison of two surgical approaches for full thickness excision, i.e. transanal disc excision (TADE) and nerve-vessel sparing limited segmental resection (NVSSR), regarding gastrointestinal functional outcomes using the LARS / Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) by Eypasch questionnaires.

Detailed description

Several studies show a significant drop in pain scores, improved fertility outcomes and amelioration of impaired sexual functioning in women following surgical resection of colorectal endometriosis. However, there is inceasing evidence that intermediate and long-term bowel dysfunction may occur as a consequence of radical surgery for rectal deep endometriosis (DE). Typical symptoms include constipation, feeling of incomplete evacuation, clustering of stools and urgency. This is described in the colorectal surgical literature as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). The choice of operation is largely dependent on the extent of disease. Statistically significant differences in functional outcomes were found in favor of the conservative surgical approach, i.e. resection of endometriotic tissue with preservation of the luminal structure of the rectal wall thereby avoiding segmental bowel resection. In a recent retrospective multicentric cohort analysis, the incidence of LARS after either nerve and vessel sparing segmental resection (NVSSR) or transanal disc excision (TADE) performed for the surgical treatment of colorectal DE was assessed. All patients underwent a low rectum resection, with a resection line lower than 7cm from anal verge. In contrast to previoisly published data, no statistically significant difference between the incidence of the LARS among patients operated using TADE when compared to women treated by NVSSR were found. Interestingly, the occurence of LARS was positively associated with the use of protective ileo-or colostomy. A higher rate of severe complications was observed in the TADE group than among patients who underwent a NVSSR. Weaknesses of this study are the retrospective design and a possible bias in the TADE regarding larger DE nodules as well as the possibility of bowel dysfunction prior to surgery in women with DE. The primary aim of the present study is the prospective comparison of two surgical approaches for full thickness excision of rectal DE resulting in an anastomotic height ≤7 cm distance from the anal verge. One technique involves the preservation of the residual luminal wall integrity (disc resection) known as Rouen technique/ TADE. The other technique involves limited resection of the bowel wall with preservation of all adjacent structures (autonomic pelvic plexus, rectal vascular supply) known as NVSSR. Gastrointestinal functional outcomes of the two procedures will be compared using the LARS / GIQLI by Eypasch questionnaires. Since digestive complaints may also be present presurgically, evaluation of digestive complaints will be recorded pre- and post surgery.

Interventions

OTHEREvaluation of pre- and postoperative gastrointestinal functional outcomes

Gastrointestinal functional outcomes will be evaluated using the LARS and the GIQLI by Eypasch questionnaires.

Sponsors

Univ.-Doz. Dr.med.univ. Gernot Hudelist, MSc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Premenopausal women undergoing full thickness excision of rectal deep endometriosis (DE) resulting in an anastomotic height ≤7 cm distance from the anal verge

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosed or suspected malignancy * Previous colorectal surgery * Previous history of chronic inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract and/or chronic defecation dysfunction related to other factors such as birth trauma etc.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of gastrointestinal functional outcomes between groups using the LARS questionnaire4 to 24 monthsGastrointestinal functional outcomes in the nerve and vessel sparing segmental resection (NVSSR) group versus the transanal disc excision (TADE) group will be compared using the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) questionnaire. LARS questionnaire: scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 42 points; higher scores mean a worse outcome
Comparison of gastrointestinal functional outcomes between groups using the GIQLI by Eypasch questionnaire4 to 24 monthsGastrointestinal functional outcomes in the nerve and vessel sparing segmental resection (NVSSR) group versus the transanal disc excision (TADE) group will be compared using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) by Eypasch questionnaire. GIQLI by Eypasch questionnaire: scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 144 points; higher scores mean a better outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prevalence of presurgical digestive complaints (LARS)1 dayThe prevalence of presurgical digestive complaints assessed using the LARS questionnaire will be evaluated.
Prevalence of presurgical digestive complaints (GIQLI by Eypasch)1 dayThe prevalence of presurgical digestive complaints assessed using the GIQLI by Eypasch questionnaire will be evaluated.

Countries

Austria

Contacts

Primary ContactGernot Hudelist, MD, MSc
gernot.hudelist@womanandhealth.com0043 1 5333 654

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026