Skip to content

Role of Sacubitril/Valsartan in the Improvement of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Reverse Remodeling is Associated With Hemodynamic Improvement and Stabilization in Outpatients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Treated With Sacubitril/Valsartan: an Echocardiographic Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04397302
Enrollment
652
Registered
2020-05-21
Start date
2019-01-13
Completion date
2020-03-16
Last updated
2020-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure, Left Sided, Left Ventricular Dysfunction, Ventricular Remodeling

Keywords

Angiotensin-receptor neprilysin-inhibitor, Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, Left ventricular filling pressure, Left ventricular reverse remodeling

Brief summary

This prospective study evaluates the mechanisms of benefit of sacubitril/valsartan in a population of outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, to investigate the relationship between the effects on left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes and noninvasively hemodynamic echo-derived parameters, as cardiac output and left ventricular filling pressure.

Detailed description

Therapeutic interventions were made according to a titration protocol in stable optimal medical therapy. Therapy with sacubitril/valsartan was introduced after a 48-hour wash-out of an ACE inhibitor or after a 24-hour wash-out of an angiotensin receptor antagonist. Doses of sacubitril/valsartan were optimized to individual tolerability. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and after 12 months. LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were calculated according to the biplane Simpson's method according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Doppler examinations included assessment of early diastolic filling velocity and early diastolic mitral annular velocity, an averaged E/e' ≥ 13 was considered a surrogate marker of increased filling pressure. The LV stroke volume was calculated as the product of the LV outflow tract area and the time-velocity integral of the aortic flow velocity or was evaluated as the difference between LVEDV and LVESV. The LVSV index was estimated as LVSV divided by body surface area. Cardiac output (CO) was measured as stroke volume times heart rate, and the cardiac index was estimated by dividing CO by body surface area. Patients who presented reverse remodeling were considered those exhibiting a ≥ 10% increase in ejection fraction and ≥15% reduction in end-systolic volume compared to baseline. The accuracy of the sources data was verified by using in-hospital medical records, computerized or paper, by checking data from ultrasound images, laboratory reports or ambulatory cardiological tests. Detailed information on patients' medical history, including medications and loop diuretic doses, was recorded for each patient. Patients' functional status was determined according to the classification of the New York Heart Association. Creatinine, B-type natriuretic peptide and amino-terminal pro-type B-natriuretic peptide levels were measured using standard laboratory methods. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. Patients were removed from therapy with sacubitril/valsartan or assessment for non-adherence to treatment or persistent drug-related adverse event with his/her willingness to discontinue treatment. Continuous measures were expressed as the mean value ± SD or median and interquartile range (IRQ) for normally and non-normally distributed variables, respectively. Continuous data were compared using paired and independent samples Student t-test or ANOVA when appropriate. Categorical variables were presented as percentages and were compared using Chi-square or McNemar test. Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests were used to analyze non-normally distributed variables. All differences were considered significant at the p = 0.05 level. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTRole of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Hemodynamic and Echocardiographic Improvement of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Reverse Remodeling is Associated With Hemodynamic Improvement and Stabilization in Outpatients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Treated With Sacubitril/Valsartan: an Echocardiographic Study

Sponsors

Università degli Studi di Brescia
CollaboratorOTHER
Federico II University
CollaboratorOTHER
Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia
CollaboratorOTHER
University Of Perugia
CollaboratorOTHER
Monaldi Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Messina
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Siena
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Salerno
CollaboratorOTHER
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia
CollaboratorOTHER
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
CollaboratorOTHER
Azienda Unita Sanitaria Locale di Piacenza
CollaboratorOTHER
Italian Society of Cardiology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Ambulatory patients on stable optimal medical therapy * History of HF and LVEF ≤ 40% * II-III NYHA class

Exclusion criteria

* History of congenital heart disease * Severe valvular disease or valvular surgery * Recent acute coronary syndromes or stroke * Poor acoustic windows or missing data. * Death or uncompleted follow-up evaluation * Cardiac surgery interventions * Cardiac resynchronization therapy * Coronary or mitral interventions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline in Cardiac Output after 12 months of treatmentMarch, 16 th 2019 - March,16th 2020Cardiac Output (in L/min) is a variable measured by echocardiography as the product of LV stroke volume (in mL/beat) and heart rate (in bpm).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline in Left Ventricular Filling Pressure after 12 months of treatmentMarch, 16th 2019 - March,16th 2020Left ventricular filling pressure is calculated by Doppler Echocardiography as the ratio of early diastolic filling velocity (E wave, m/s) and early diastolic mitral annular velocity (e', m/s). The increase of this ratio is indicative of higher LV filling pressure.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline in Left Ventricular Stroke Volume after 12 months of treatmentMarch, 16th 2019 - March,16th 2020The LV stroke volume (in mL/beat) is obtained at echocardiography, as the product of the LV outflow tract area (cm2) and the time-velocity integral (cm) of the aortic flow velocity.
Change from baseline in Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume after 12 months of treatmentMarch, 16th 2019 - March,16th 2020The LV End-systolic volume (in mL) is calculated according to the biplane Simpson's method according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026