Skip to content

Conventional Photodynamic Therapy vs. Painless Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratosis

Conventional Photodynamic Therapy vs. Painless Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratosis#a Randomized, Open-label Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04396184
Enrollment
10
Registered
2020-05-20
Start date
2020-05-01
Completion date
2021-04-30
Last updated
2020-05-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Actinic Keratosis

Keywords

Photodynamic Therapy, Conventional, Painless, Actinic Keratosis

Brief summary

This study is being done to compare a new, continuous illumination and short Incubation time regimen of aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy#ALA-PDT) to a conventional regimen for treatment of Actinic Keratosis. The hypothesis is that the continuous illumination approach will be less or even no painful, but equally efficacious, as the old regimen.

Detailed description

This study is being done to compare a new, continuous illumination and short Incubation time regimen of aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy#painless-PDT) to a conventional regimen for treatment of Actinic Keratosis. The hypothesis is that the continuous illumination approach will be less or even no painful, but equally efficacious, as the old regimen.

Interventions

Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy

Sponsors

Shanghai Dermatology Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Evaluator assesses photographs without prior knowledge of intervention

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Clinical diagnosed with AK (OLSEN classification grade I, II, III), aged \> 18 years (Because no dosing or adverse event data are currently available on the use of topical aminolevulinic acid in patients \<18 years of age, children are excluded from this study); 2. All patients are unfit and reluctant to undergo surgery for any reasons, and volunteered to participate in the study and ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent. Patents are willing to pay for the treatment, and agreed to take a picture of the skin lesions.

Exclusion criteria

1. Those who had ALA-PDT and any other studies that affect this study within 12 weeks ; 2. There are other facial diseases that may affect the efficacy evaluation, such as other photodermatosis; 3. Take phototoxic or photosensitizer within 8 weeks; 4. Clinical and / or pathological prove that the tumor has invaded other organs or tissues; 5. Serious immunocompromised persons; 6. scar constitution; 7. Patients are known to have skin photosensitivity, porphyria, or allergies to ALA, light or lidocaine; 8. Persons are suffering from severe internal diseases, mental and mental illness, infectious diseases or pregnant or lactating women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The clearance rate of Actinic Keratosessix weeks after treatmentThe change rate in lesion clearance of Actinic Keratoses at six weeks after treatment will be measured as the primary outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain assessmentImmediately, 1st minute, 3rd minute, 5th minute, 10th minute, 30th minute, 1hour ,2hour, 4hour, 12hour, 24hour,48hour ,72hourThe pain will be assessed using Vissual Analogue Scale(VAS) with a score range of 0-10.The higher the score,the greater the pain, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the most unbearable pain. Pain will be measured at different time points during and after every treatment

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactYunfeng Zhang, MD
yunfeng0519116@aliyun.com18217422425
Backup ContactHaiyan Zhang, MD
zhanghaiyan10842@163.com18017336573

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026