Skip to content

Optimizing Cognitive Remediation

Optimizing Cognitive Remediation in VA Mental Health Rehabilitation Settings

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04395157
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-05-20
Start date
2020-12-01
Completion date
2025-04-30
Last updated
2026-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Mood Disorders, Schizophrenia, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

Keywords

Electroencephalography, Cognition, Rehabilitation

Brief summary

Veterans with mental illness face challenges with community reintegration, including achieving vocational success, attaining their educational goals and going back to school, and maintaining a high quality of life. VA Mental Health Residential Rehabilitation Treatment Programs, Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Recovery Centers and other mental health treatment programs are designed to help Veterans overcome these barriers, but cognitive impairment often seen in Veterans with mental illness limits gains from these settings. Cognitive remediation interventions can be helpful, but they are either "one-size fits all," and thus may not be useful for all Veterans with mental illness, or are too narrow in scope, focusing on specific mental illnesses, limiting generalizability. This project will test whether an objective neurophysiological biomarker, mismatch negativity (MMN), can better match the "right" Veteran to the "right" cognitive remediation treatment regardless of their specific mental health diagnosis.

Detailed description

This is an observational, non-interventional study. Veterans with mental health diagnoses currently engaged in, or within 6 weeks of discharge from VA Mental Health Residential Rehabilitation Treatment Programs (RRTP), Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Recovery Centers (PRRC), and other mental health treatment settings (inpatient or outpatient mental healthcare) will be recruited. Veterans will have their cognitive functioning assessed. Following this, mismatch negativity (MMN) will be assessed via electroencephalography (EEG). Participants will undergo a 1 hour computerized cognitive training program. They will be interviewed about their attitudes about EEG and computerized cognitive training. They will be followed monthly for a total of 4 months from study entry to assess recovery trajectory. This study aims to enroll 104 Veterans from the VA San Diego Healthcare System. The Specific Aims of this proposal are 1) Determine whether MMN is related to functioning, psychosocial recovery in VA rehabilitation milieus and programs; 2) Determine whether MMN is linked to cognition and predicts cognitive remediation exercise performance in a heterogeneous group of Veterans with mental illness. The proposal will also assess feasibility and acceptability of using biomarker-guided cognitive rehabilitation interventions in VA mental health rehabilitation settings. Information gained from this study will help establish a precision-medicine approach towards cognitive rehabilitation for Veterans with mental illness.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Veterans are currently enrolled in or within 6 weeks of discharge from (as relevant): a VA San Diego Healthcare System (VASDHS) psychosocial rehabilitation and recovery center (PRRC), VASDHS mental health residential rehabilitation treatment program (RRTP), VASDHS acute inpatient hospitalization or VASDHS outpatient mental health treatment * have a DSM-5 mental illness, including: * schizophrenia * schizoaffective disorder * delusional disorder * major depressive disorder * bipolar disorder * generalized anxiety disorder * PTSD * fluent and literate in English * no impairment in hearing or vision

Exclusion criteria

* active substance use within the last 30 days * positive urine drug screen conducted as part of the screening process * have acute/ongoing thoughts of self-harm or harming others * intellectual disability or a neurocognitive disorder (i.e. dementia)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Global Composite T-score (MCCB-C)Baseline visitPerformance on MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery at Baseline Visit as measured by the Global Composite T-score (MCCB-C). The MCCB Global Composite T-score (MCCB-C) is the primary neurocognitive outcome measured at baseline. The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) composite T-score has no minimum or maximum score because it uses T-scores, which are standardized based on a community sample. A normal range MCCB composite T-score is between 40 and 60 and higher scores indicate better neurocognitive outcome. An MCCB composite T-score of 50 represents population mean with a standard deviation of 10.
Cognitive Training Performance-Number of Levels CompletedBaseline visit onlyPerformance on a 1-hour computerized auditory cognitive training exercise as measured by the number of levels completed at the baseline visit. Participants were presented with pairs of frequency-modulated sound "sweeps" and indicated whether they perceived each sweep as becoming higher or lower in pitch. A correct response consisted of accurately identifying the trajectory of both sweeps in the stimulus pair. Sweep duration, frequency range, and interstimulus interval (ISI) become shorter after correct responses, but longer after incorrect responses. Participants progressed through repetition of "levels" of ATCT. Each level consisted of identifying 34 sets of stimuli pairs and each level was completed 3 times, before progressing to the next level. Higher values indicate the subject reliably advanced through more levels of the exercise (i.e., became proficient on trials with shorter frequency-modulated sweep durations), while lower values indicate remaining at easier training levels.
World Health Organization Disability Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)3 monthsFunction was assessed via the World Health Organization Disability Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) at baseline, and at the 1, 2 and 3 month follow-up visits. The WHODAS 2.0 has a range 12-60, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
WHOQOL-BREF Total Score3 monthsThe World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF) is a 26-item instrument consisting of 4 domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships and environment. Each item is rated between 1 (not at all) to 5 (completely). The total score is presented between 26 and 156, where higher scores represent higher (better) quality of life. The WHOQOL-BREF was administered at baseline, and at the 1, 2 and 3 month follow-up visits.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORYash B. Joshi, MD PhD

VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous49.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.74
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
70 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
55 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
74 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 89
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 89
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 89

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026