Skip to content

Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder With Bilateral Theta Burst Stimulation

Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder With Bilateral Theta Burst Stimulation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04392947
Acronym
TBS-D
Enrollment
238
Registered
2020-05-19
Start date
2020-09-29
Completion date
2025-07-31
Last updated
2025-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

major depression, theta burst stimulation, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter

Brief summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled multicenter clinical trial. The aim is to provide evidence for efficacy of TBS in the treatment of patients with major depression. There will be a direct comparison between combined cTBS/iTBS with sham TBS. Overall, 236 patients with major depression will be randomized either to active TBS or sham TBS in a 1:1 ratio. The planned stimulation paradigms will be applied as add-on therapy to standard therapy (antidepressive medication and / or psychotherapy). Patients will receive 30 stimulation sessions in a 6-week treatment period (one session daily from Monday to Friday). Follow up assessments are scheduled 1 and 3 months after end of treatment period.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

MagVenture Coil Cool B70 A/P

DEVICESham Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

MagVenture Coil Cool B70 A/P without TMS being actively delivered

Sponsors

Federal Ministry of Health, Germany
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and applied Biometry, University Tuebingen, Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Center of Clinical Trials, University Tuebingen, Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Ulm
CollaboratorOTHER
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Regensburg, Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Wuerzburg, Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Munich (LMU), Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Leipzig, Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Bezirkskrankenhaus Augsburg, Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital Tuebingen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The usage of a special active/placebo (A/P) coil in combination with an electrical co-stimulation will guarantee masking. A hard cover surrounds the A/P coil and for this reason it is not possible to see which side is the active side of the coil. By entering a randomized code into the stimulator, the operator receive information whether the coil is in the correct position or has to be flipped around. The code does not allow third parties to identify to which study arm a patient has been assigned. The concealment of the assignment remains until the statistical analysis is finished.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* moderate or severe unipolar depression diagnosed according to criteria of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) * duration of the current episode must be ≥ 6 weeks and ≤ 2 years * HDRS17 ≥ 18 * mild to moderate treatment resistance according to the Antidepressant Treatment History Form \[ATHF-SF\]. Treatment resistance is defined as having failed at least one but no more than three adequate antidepressant treatments in this episode * stable antidepressive medication 4 weeks before treatment or no antidepressive treatment * no further relevant psychiatric axis-I and/or axis-II disorder except for anxiety disorders (according to DSM-5 and SCID-5-PD) * no comorbid psychotic symptoms * ability to give consent

Exclusion criteria

* acute suicidality (MADRS item 10 score \> 4) * antiepileptic drugs and/or benzodiazepines corresponding to \> 1mg lorazepam / day * history of brain surgery, significant and clinically relevant brain malformation or neoplasm, head injury, stroke, dementia or other neurodegenerative disorder * history of seizures * previous rTMS treatment * lifetime history of non-response to adequate electroconvulsive therapy (minimum of eight treatments) * deep brain stimulation * cardiac pacemakers, intracranial implant, or metal in the cranium * substance dependence or abuse in the past 3 months (with the exception of tobacco) * severe somatic comorbidity as judged by the study physician * pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response rate of Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)6 weeksMADRS reduction of at least 50% of baseline value after end of treatment period between active combined iTBS / cTBS and the sham condition. (rater questionnaire; MADRS raw score ranges between 0 and 60; the higher the score, the more severe depression)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction of raw score: Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)6 weeksThe reduction of the raw score after treatment will be compared between active TBS and sham TBS (rater questionnaire; range between 0 and 60; higher score indicates higher level of severity)
Reduction of raw score: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 items (HDRS17)6 weeksThe reduction of the raw score after treatment will be compared between active TBS and sham TBS (rater questionnaire; score ranges from 0-53;higher score indicates higher level of severity)
Reduction of raw score: Clinical Global Impression (CGI)6 weeksThe reduction of the raw score after treatment will be compared between active TBS and sham TBS (rater questionnaire; score ranges from 0-7; higher score indicates higher level of severity)
Reduction of raw score: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)10 and 18 weeksThe reduction of the raw score during follow-up will be compared between active TBS and sham TBS (self-rating questionnaire; score ranges from 0-63; higher score indicates higher level of severity)
Reduction of raw score: WHO-5 well-being index10 and 18 weeksThe reduction of the raw score during follow-up will be compared between active TBS and sham TBS (self-rating questionnaire; score ranges from 0-25; lower score indicates higher level of severity)
Remission rate after treatment6 weeksMontgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) \</= 10 after treatment (rater questionnaire; MADRS raw score ranges between 0 and 60; the higher the score, the more severe depression)
Frequency of adverse events6 weeksComparison of both arms in respect to number of adverse events during treatment period
Deterioration rate after treatment period6 weeksDeterioration is defined as an increase of MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) score of 25% compared to baseline score (rater questionnaire; range between 0 and 60; higher score indicates higher level of severity)
Examination of the influence of Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) at baseline as possible predictor for change of MADRS6 weeksIt will be examined whether the CTQ can be used for predicting treatment effect, measured by Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS, see above)
Examination of the influence of cognitive performance at baseline as possible predictor for change of MADRS6 weeksIt will be examined whether cognitive performance measured by THINC-Integrated Tool (Thinc-it -tool; includes 4 different test covering different aspects of cognition) at baseline can be used for predicting treatment effect, measured by Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS, see above)
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI)6 and 18 weeksFunctionality will be assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI; self-rating questionnaire) at baseline, after treatment period as well as during follow-up; contains 6 questions about the effect of health problems on the ability to work and perform regular activities. Health problems are defined as any physical or emotional problem or symptom. Patients are asked to fill in the blanks or circle a number; there is no overall score;

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026